<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.7.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal Camouflage Pattern Not So Universal?</title>
	<link>http://soldiersystems.net/2008/10/14/universal-camouflage-pattern-not-so-universal/</link>
	<description>An Industry Daily</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camo Rumors - Some Observations &#171; Soldier Systems</title>
		<link>http://soldiersystems.net/2008/10/14/universal-camouflage-pattern-not-so-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Camo Rumors - Some Observations &#171; Soldier Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://soldiersystems.net/2008/10/14/universal-camouflage-pattern-not-so-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>[...] or more of the first three with COA 4 as the ultimate outcome. There is already precedence with the Army&#8217;s G1 permitting USASOC forces to wear Woodland camo. Plus, there are stock of the older patterns that can be drawn from to get this thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or more of the first three with COA 4 as the ultimate outcome. There is already precedence with the Army&#8217;s G1 permitting USASOC forces to wear Woodland camo. Plus, there are stock of the older patterns that can be drawn from to get this thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
