5 Responses to “BROWE Hitting Cover of ‘Special Weapons’”

1. Joe says:

   February 11, 2012 at 15:55

   You can’t trust these type of magazines for a real review. They’ll never call a dog a dog or say “get this over that” for fear of offending an advertiser.

   All a bunch of @ss kissers.

   Go to a un-bought reviewer like Gun Tests or the ar-15.com boards for a real review.

   • SSD says:

     February 12, 2012 at 00:32

     So are you saying that the magazine contains a review of the BROWE Combat Optic that contains lies? If so, I’d like to know how you came to this conclusion since the article hasn’t hit the street yet.

     • Joe says:

       February 12, 2012 at 12:30

       I’m saying that you can assume they will not say “the ACOG is now 2nd best buy this instead” or if it’s a dog, they will not say ” AGOC is still king, don’t buy this”

       They are biased to the positive because they will not bite the hand(advertiser) that feeds them(or potentially feeds them).

       • SSD says:

         February 12, 2012 at 16:28

         It might say that, but how about we wait and see. I haven’t used one yet. I have however used an ACOG. My first time was in 94 when I had one on the M16A2 I carried in Haiti. I like the ACOG.

       • Riceball says:

         February 13, 2012 at 20:56

         On the other hand/bright, you’ll know that if they ever come out with a negative review of something then you can be pretty certain that it must really be crap.