FirstSpear TV
«
»

Quokkajoy Baby Carrier

(null)

It’s a MultiCam baby carrier. I wish these guys luck with this one. Another company created some prototypes but the liability insurance was too much to make it cost effective.

(null)

Coming soon.

www.quokkajoy.com

Tags:

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 5th, 2015 at 16:00 and is filed under Off-Duty. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

19 Responses to “Quokkajoy Baby Carrier”

  1. Dellis says:
    February 5, 2015 at 16:04

    Call me dumb……but I don’t get the liability insurance being any different for this carrier from say one made by Gerber….if they even make them?

    Or is the liability just high for this type of item across the board? I would assume it is given it’s a safety concern.

    • Griffin says:
      February 5, 2015 at 16:47

      I’m guessing a huge corporation like Gerber can afford costly liability but the previous company they are referring to is a very small Canadian company and i’m sure the cost was just to high, additionally Gerber probably sells allot more to a wider audience than there would ever be for a multicam tacticool baby carrier…………

      • SSD says:
        February 5, 2015 at 17:09

        It was Mayflower

        • Alex says:
          February 5, 2015 at 18:07

          Ferro Concepts is the small Canadian Company that was mentioned and I believe they have stated that the carrier is only sold in Canada due to liability issues in the United States.

          • KaosKydex says:
            February 5, 2015 at 18:17

            SSD was referring to Mayflower, they made the carrier long before Ferro introduced theirs.

            • Mayflower says:
              February 5, 2015 at 18:51

              The possibility of a frivolous lawsuit for anything to do with children is too great and not worth the risk to sell a product that is not the mainstay of your company.

  2. Chris says:
    February 5, 2015 at 17:28

    I had a Baby Bjorn that a friend had outfitted with MOLLE. Worked really well would be nice if this is a success.

  3. Joe08 says:
    February 5, 2015 at 18:53

    Tacticool aside… that looks like a very comfortable baby carrier. Looks very well designed.

  4. Francis says:
    February 5, 2015 at 19:21

    This takes me back. Went to a gun show in Tulsa – long long time ago now – but the wife and I will never forget seeing a young couple with baby in a stroller. Everything and everyone was decked out in camo. Dad was slinging a Thompson (semi-auto I’m sure/hope). There were a couple of gallon ziplocks of .45 acp in the storage hammock under the stroller where the diapers normally go. I’m sure the little tike is all grown now; probably went off to start his own compound. Precious memories.

  5. Evets Steve says:
    February 5, 2015 at 20:17

    My daughter puked on my rush72. With almost super-villain speed, the vomit quickly went into, behind and around every molle strap and connected pouch on the bag. Cleaning that up was horrible and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone (except admin staff weenies, you know who you are)

  6. Cold Case says:
    February 5, 2015 at 23:44

    Tried to share this on FB, but the link has graphic from Combat FlipFlops blurb?

  7. Bill says:
    February 6, 2015 at 04:06

    Multicam has the right colorway to blend in with baby barf and strained peas.

    I bet insurance would be high – a couple ripped stitches and baby goes Airborne. And if you were hiking in the Multicam Forest, you might never find it again.

    Yes, my kid was an “it” when it was at that age.

  8. Buckaroomedic says:
    February 6, 2015 at 08:13

    Once again, this is what’s wrong with the US of A; too many lawyers and not enough doctors!

  9. Lance says:
    February 6, 2015 at 14:51

    Life safety issues in manufacturing bring on big time liability even when your doing things right. Insurers tend to settle…I remember that image a few years back…