B5 Systems

How The Zombies Ate Your Guns in 2013 2017 2019

I guess it’s that time again. It seems like I post this during every Congress.

There once was a powerful zombie queen named Dianne. Dianne doesn’t seem like such a terrifying name and that’s probably why she went unnoticed as a zombie for so long. Don’t get me wrong. All of the signs that she was undead were there; the lifeless eyes, the gaunt white skin stretched taught over sharp cheekbones, the ridiculous bouffant wigs used to hide her balding pate and the lispy voice that turned the “s” at the end of a word into a “z”, like in “gunz” and “brainz”. All classic signs, and yet, we missed them all.

She had fooled her people for decades despite looking like the living dead when she ascended to her position, and yet not aging the entire time. Of course, the people she ruled were more concerned with good times and hand outs than protecting themselves.

Queen of the Damned Dianne knew that her kind would never take over so long as the living were armed. So for years and years she plotted and schemed. The path for her unholy horde was clear. Disarm the living and they would feast on brainz for breakfast, lunch and dinner. But how?

Finally, a tragedy struck and, relying on sentimentality, undead Dianne used her power to ramrod new laws through that would disarm the living. In a sense of guilt, the living were disarmed. Those who opposed this were labeled as kooks and crazies and led off as criminals.

Unfortunately, this isn’t a fairy tale with a happy ending. The zombies are at the door. First, they will eat your gunz and then they will come for your brainz. Stop Zombie Queen Dianne’s evil gun grabbing agenda and expose her for what she is. Unchecked, she will suck the life out of you, your family, and your neighbors.

We don’t often publish speculative fiction on SSD but I didn’t think this one could wait until Halloween.

54 Responses to “How The Zombies Ate Your Guns in 2013 2017 2019”

  1. Joshua says:

    This is so stupid, and probably the reason that SSD doesn’t “often publish speculative fiction.”

    • John Moses Browning says:

      Fuck off, you anti-gun faggot.

    • SamHill says:

      Joshua, at least the patriots are still being civil with the mentally challenged commies and haven’t gone all 1776 yet. If there is an oath breaker in office in your state it is your duty to help get them voted out, not to feign offended and be a passive aggressive virtue signaler, while letting traitors systematically remove the rights of your countrymen. If not, we freedom loving Americans, believing that our rights are natural and not bestowed upon us by elected officials, believing wholly in our prescribed form of limited government and in our power, and duty to make it so, know the other remedy for tyrannical government. America will remain free and, by God, if it takes a culling of these traitors from our land we will see it done.
      Keep rolling the dice snowflakes, my team brings the heat.

  2. Bryan says:

    Thought this website was better than this. Nope.

  3. Stash says:

    Standing by for TominVA to tell us what we need and don’t need and how an AWB is necessary.

    • TominVA says:

      Not tonight. Soon though….

      • John Moses Browning says:

        Nobody cares what you want commie. If you’re actually from Virginia how about you move to one of those states where guns are all but outlawed and people live in fear of being shot by a punk in a drive by or murdered in a home invasion by an illegal.

        • Ed says:

          John B., I was stationed in VA multiple times and even lived in Charlottesville for a few years. Unfortunately VA is more Purple/Blue now than Red like past decades. TominVA is probably a cuck from Northern VA right outside of DC where all the cucked idiot-libs want to dictate to us how we should live and bow to their “superior” intellect. I never really had any hope for VA since the infestation is at peak Prog-lib.cuck capacity.

          • STAMarine says:

            Hate to say it, but you’re right. VA might as well be pure blue now and sinking fast. I miss the way my beloved Commonwealth used to be. We’re still conservative here in Southwest Virginia, but we don’t count.

      • Stash says:

        https://www.wearemoa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Finished-701.2.pdf

        Here’s some reading for you. But we know you won’t read it. Or pay attention to any other facts. You’ll start by saying something like, “you don’t need _____” or “explain why you need _____” when there is no possible combination of words in the english language you would accept as a response. It’s a bill of rights, not needs. You don’t NEED the right to free speech on the internet, yet here you are.

        Then you’ll probably retort with “say THAT to the survivors/bereaved parents/widows of _____ tragedy,” when confronted with facts.

        You’ll move right on past the facts of how many people are killed with rifles annually, being roughly equal to the number of people being struck by lightning, and move on to your pie-in-the-sky AWB idea.

        The one where you think somehow a law would be written where it would be 100% turn-in, with no jail time or felonies, and people would comply. Despite the fact that no other gun law in the nation is written like this. “I’ll change that when I’m king,” you specifically said last time. You’re not going to be king.

        Gun control requires gun violence to enforce. And you’re ok with that. Or you’ll just refuse to admit the point. People might refuse to pay your “huge-ass” fine or whatever you referred to it as. What then?

        Be the change you want to see in the world, and go co-write the details of the bill with Feinstein, join the ATF, or just leave here, since this site is pro-gun and pro-individual freedom, and you are not.

  4. TominVA says:

    Ok not a great moment for this site, but I can’t judge too harshly given some comments I’ve made.

    • John Moses Browning says:

      This is a fantastic moment as it flushes out the traitors to the constitution like you.

  5. Marcus says:

    The zombies have already been here in New York and I’m pretty sure they’ve gotten most of the brains. They re-elected the main zombie.

    By the way, whatever happened to the Chinese spy that Feinstein employed?

  6. Dellis says:

    It’s only speculative until it happens, I reckon.

    Depending on where one gathers their intel from, TV, cable, radio, interweb, late night shows or the View, it would seem that either more and more people are buying guns or more and more people feel the 2A is archaic and needs to be done away with. Both sides have their stats, studies and hard drives filled with devastating MEME’s!!

    All’s I know is I have no problem giving up my guns to the gestapo when they come. Cause all the good ones are buried deep in my bunker.

    • Nick C. says:

      Just to point out, your points are not mutually exclusive. It could be true that more people are buying guns while more people feel the 2A is archaic. For one thing we have data on gun sales but not % of population that owns guns (from my understanding).

      • Dellis says:

        You are correct. I find it to be a huge positive that women are a driving force now behind firearm purchases, of course one would not really know this watching mainstream news.

        I believe that Montana has more people owning guns BUT Texas has more guns. So more people in Texas own several weapons while people in Montana own fewer guns per person but more people own them…man I just blew a gasket trying to make sense of that, hope you and others understood my ramble.

  7. Stu says:

    If you wete to comment on this please consider this…

    The anti-2A arguments have been going on for over 200 years.

    The arguments are void of tacit fact, and more an attempt at trying to hide misguided passion and emotion as fact.

    Commonly used by politicians as scapegoat for their lack of ability in dealing with crime and the crimewaves that happen when they are in office.

    For as long as I’ve been reading this site, I am more curious as to what SSD has to say, given that sometimes its short and delightfully laconic, but I think I’m seeing something above(dry humor, is that you?), and just looking for a confirmation.

  8. Maggie says:

    Sadly Dianne’s claim to fame has been riding on the coat tails of two deaths—(Mayor Moscone and Sup. Harvey Milk)….before then, she was nothing….so needs to stop already….hasn’t she made enough money off their deaths?

  9. Desert Lizard says:

    I’m surprised at some of the comments I’m seeing above. If you want to know why we American citizens don’t stop saying things to this effect, it’s because half the country keeps voting for politicians that push anti-2A, unconstitutional agendas. You can see around the country where these politicians are unchecked these type of anti-2A agendas get furthered.

    There is a war going on in this world for the freedom of men. Some people want all mankind to be under the control of a worldwide government. Other people, like myself, see each person as special and uniquely important, with valuable thoughts, natural rights given by God, and as autonomous individuals that don’t need to answer to anybody except for voluntary cooperation to very-limited authorities that they and their community has elected. And the 2A is one of the few stalwart defenses in that war.

    I hope none of you ever back down in this fight. Don’t fall for this crap that the enemy just wants to get along with you. “There is a time for war.” (Ecclesiastes 3:8)

    • Dellis says:

      One only has to look at Texas and see how close we came to going in the purple shade this last election cycle. At this current rate, Texas will slide fully into that blue column and if we go (Texas) then who’s next?

      In my business I get a lot of X-Cali people who have left the Left Haven Resort of California cause of the damage those policies have done to that once fine state. Has their outlook changed on political policies? Nope. They come to Texas and continue to vote the same twat-fairies into office.

      Look how much money “beto” brought into his campaign this last election cycle! The progressive left has it’s puss infected cyclop eye zeroed in on Texas for they say if we can get Texas, we can get any state! Austin, Dallas, Houston and now San Antonio…are all left/liberal. In San Antonio we just dropped $70K on a “rainbow crosswalk” to support the LBGTFCDSTRUNIIOPPKLD (Did I miss anyone?)community. After a few hundred cars that rainbow is gonna look like schnit.

      I wouldn’t mind so much if on the other side of the street we had a “hetero-sexual crosswalk” or what about a “hop-scotch crosswalk”?

      • SamHill says:

        Ever looked up how many congress have dual citizenship?

        • Jordan says:

          This is important. Many people in western republics and democracies alike are not from the place and people they ought to represent. Migrants will always push for more migration, Jews for more foreign help, Blacks for more programs.

          Singapore has some very interesting insight into this:

          https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/ethnic-considerations-never-absent-when-singaporeans-choose-leader-says-pm-lee

          When it comes to elections you side with your own against those that are not like you.

          This was especially evident in the 2016 election of Donald Trump. White America voted him into office, something that will never happen again if the white majority is gone. It would be Hillary for eternity.

          If the 1965 immigration would not have been passed, there would not have been a single Democrat president since.

      • Ed says:

        Twat-faries! Priceless!! Thanks Dellis

      • Ed says:

        Twat-fairies! Priceless!! Thanks Dellis

        • Dellis says:

          Damn happy to give you a chuckle Ed!

          • Alpha2 says:

            I hear ya Dellis…same thing is occurring in Oregon and Washington state. To me it seems like once high tech started to branch out into those states as well as yours (Austin aka Silicon Valley South) it brought the liberal minded folks with them that continually vote as you so eloquently put it “twat fairies” into office and you start hearing more and more anti-gun rhetoric.

  10. Fox says:

    It is good to see SSD take a stance. It makes me proud that you would stake your fortune in support of Constitutional rights. From someone who has taken the same oath of Allegiance, I stand with you SSD.

    • RFfromNOVA says:

      Make no mistake about it. SSD is on the side of the constitution. I’ve been following this blog for several years. Keep up the good work sir.

    • John Moses Browning says:

      Well said!

  11. Matt says:

    The Zombie is never quit , never stop, never forget to bite something.
    Till the end of the world , one thing purpose only.

  12. SamHill says:

    “I, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    -Millions of us. Including:
    18.8 million veterans
    1.3 million active-duty
    congress
    the President

    • John Moses Browning says:

      Amen, brother, amen!

    • Jordan says:

      Feinstein is not an American, she is jewish. Her loyalty lies not with the american people but with a foreign power.

      • Steak TarTar says:

        hey look at this dipshit with a hebrew name

      • Dellis says:

        Wait, hold on…Jesus was a Jew and don’t you recall where He stated:

        And He said to them, “But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no AR15 is to sell his coat and buy one.

      • SSD says:

        Please don’t go there.

  13. Marcus says:

    I just had a chance to read what will be in the bill. It makes Feinstein’s 1994 Bill look like child’s play and comes straight out of the anti-Second Amendment groups playbook. It comprehensively goes through by banning parts and features, while also diving into the details on “pistols” and parts like the “Sig Brace”. It s perhaps the most comprehensive assault on the Second Amendment in our history.

    The public version of the text has not been post yet, but will eventually be found at the following link;
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/66/text?q=%257B%2522search%2522%253A%255B%2522assault+weapon%2522%255D%257D&r=1&s=1

    Also, look at the co-sponsors. It’s not just the usual offenders in NY, NJ, MD, etc.

    • Dellis says:

      This isn’t one of them Pelosi logical deals where we “have to pass the bill in order to know what it says!” deals is it?

      Speaking of Pelosi and her logic, can we use that same logic with the wall?

      “We need to build the wall in order to know it works!” – Pelosi Logic

  14. xpoqx says:

    They want everything, and have the patience to wait to take it all little by little.

    I was once told that the most expedient way to pass any kind of legislation is to say that you’re doing it in regards to the Health safety and future of the children

    • Philip says:

      “As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.” — angry genocidal German dick, circa 1940

      Base emotional response is the raison d’être to advancing the leftist dogma.

  15. SGT Rock says:

    I was born and raised in CA and over the years I have seen my personal freedoms in regards to the 2A slowly eroded over time again and again. It was Feinstein, Boxer, and Pelosi who were the culprits of enacting draconian laws in regards to gun ownership in CA. Let alone whenever there’s some “tragedy” in regards to gun violence, every bleeding heart Dem or Lib decide to get together in the CA legislature to draft/pass a bill further restricting the 2A rights of law abiding citizens and gun owners.

    People need to get out and vote and make their voices heard! Otherwise, opportunists with their pacifist political agendas will continue to whittle away at our constitutional rights all in the name of knee jerk feel good policies.

    • El Terryble says:

      California is pretty much a one-party Communist dictatorship now-a-days. Used to be the greatest state in the Nation. Now the only thing that can save it is direct intervention by Free America or it and it’s coastal nonelite falling into the ocean. Wouldn’t live their for all the money in the world, and if I did would start forming Constitutional Resistance “club”.

    • Bob says:

      Remember when Ronald Reagan banned open carry in the 1960s?

      What party was he again?

      May 3, 1994

      To Members of the U.S. House of Representatives:
      We are writing to urge your support for a ban on the domestic manufacture of military-style assault weapons. This is a matter of vital importance to the public safety. Although assualt weapons account for less than 1% of the guns in circulation, they account for nearly 10% of the guns traced to crime.

      Every major law enforcement organization in America and dozens of leading labor, medical, religious, civil rights and civic groups support such a ban. Most importantly, poll after poll shows that the American public overwhelmingly support a ban on assault weapons. A 1993 CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll found that 77% of Americans support a ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of semi-automatic assault guns, such as the AK-47.

      The 1989 import ban resulted in an impressive 40% drop in imported assault weapons traced to crime between 1989 and 1991, but the killing continues. Last year, a killer armed with two TEC9s killed eight people at a San Francisco law firm and wounded several others. During the past five years, more than 40 law enforcement officers have been killed or wounded in the line of duty by an assault weapon.

      While we recognize that assault weapon legislation will not stop all assault weapon crime, statistics prove that we can dry up the supply of these guns, making them less accessible to criminals. We urge you to listen to the American public and to the law enforcement community and support a ban on the further manufacture of these weapons.

      Sincerely,

      Gerald R. Ford

      Jimmy Carter

      Ronald Reagan

  16. Alpha2 says:

    Same as SGT Rock..born and raised in California At 42 I remember when my Pops used to bring home firearms like an HK94, bought legally with no paperwork from a person to person transfer…he did that numerous times, no problem. Than the liberals continued to unseat conservatives and we continued year after year to see new legislation to now where it is laughable and disgusting. I work in LE on a gang unit in the Bay Area, the criminals are still very well armed…I have seen full auto everything, SBR’s and suppressors…although they say the legislation is to keep our communities safe all you have to do is look back 2 years when the “assault rifle” and ammo registration was enacted and Gov. Moonbeam had an opportunity to enhance theft of a firearm to a felony he refused to do so stating California’s prison population was already too crowded…huh? Public safety, really? I have personally seen and been a part of cases where a convicted felon is re-arrested in possession of a firearm while selling narcotics and the state does not refer gun charges to feds and fails to prosecute through state…numerous times similar arrests have ended in the same manner…which is why San Jose PD is now referring all gun charges by convicted felons to federal courts where they will be prosecuted and actually serve real prison time. Sadly the laws they enact do very little for public safety and it seems the real end goal is to disarm the law abiding citizens, as with most of this new legislation the law abiding gun owner is the one affected and sometimes turned into a criminal as a result.

  17. RobCollins says:

    My (probably overly simplistic) view is that gun violence is an enforcement issue, not a legislative one. People who make terroristic threats, or prohibited persons who attempt to purchase firearms probably should get their doors kicked in, and then move into the loving embrace of the judicial system. Maybe I’m rusty on my civics, but I don’t think so….

    It really doesn’t matter to me, I don’t own any firearms, sadly, the only one I had fell overboard in a boating accident, but I’ll gladly accept the assistance of government scuba divers to retrieve it.. It was somewhere near 38.301861, -93.457082ish. Or maybe 38.260194, -93.474808. It’s a little fuzzy….

    Going back to playing chess with Pigeons…. See ya’all at the voting booth….

  18. El Terryble says:

    Diane Feinstein’s driver for twenty years was a Communist Chinese spy with the Ministry of Intelligence(MOI), while she was Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Her husband has made ten’s of millions of dollars of business with China. It’s not a Quanon, quack conspiracy theory to say that we have Marxist Revolutionary’s embedded in our government. Hell, we elected one as president in 2008. Look what happened in Venezuela, if patriotic American’s relinquish their right to defend themselves, their families, and their way of life, America will be the world’s newest socialist dictatorship by 2030.

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/03/sen-dianne-feinsteins-personal-driver-20-years-chinese-spy/

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/08/sen-dianne-feinsteins-ties-china-go-way-deeper-alleged-office-spy/

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/27/the-silence-over-a-potential-chinese-spy-in-feinsteins-office-is-deafening/

  19. Tazman66gt says:

    I see several posters on here speaking about “gun violence”, which is a fallacy. A gun can be neither violent or benevolent, it is an inanimate object. The person wielding it can decide what and how it is used. Violence has always been a people issue, no matter the inanimate objects they use.

  20. Philip says:

    Fuck. Every. Single. One…of you spineless, ball-less, cucked communist bastards who support — in any form — any further curtailment of our already heavily infringed and overly regulated 2nd Amendment rights.

    I don’t care what you say, I don’t care how you spin it. It’s not about the kids, it’s not about violence, it’s not about safety. You scum want nothing more than a mass of unarmed, subjugated peons to lord over whilst you strong arm your toxic soy milk-gluten free-hippie-greater-good commie bullshit into further existence.

    You are the enemies of a free people and our Constitution.

    Fuck you. Fuck your cronies. Fuck your donors. Not one more inch.

  21. Ragnar says:

    SSD,
    This is GREAT fiction! Unfortunately, it’s all too real.

    You can ban the guns, but getting them will be another problem all together; Dianne. I wish you the absolute worst of luck, Sen. Feinstein.

    It’s been apparent for years that the left are straight up commies. People know what happens after confiscation, if they allow it to happen.

  22. Bob says:

    Have we mentioned how it was Ronald Reagan who banned open carry in California, signed the NFA, closed the machinegun registry, and wrote in favor the Brady Bill and early 90’s AWB?