SureFire

Regulation Tactical – Why They Designed The Glide Belt And How To Use It

www.regulationtactical.com

Tags:

15 Responses to “Regulation Tactical – Why They Designed The Glide Belt And How To Use It”

  1. MattCFII says:

    Have one, like it a lot after I got used to it. Definitely has the advantages pointed out. Downsides are you can’t pull hard to get extra tight with a buckle like a slide, cobra, G Hook, etc. but still offers more adjustment than a traditional hole belt. Also wish they made a full 1 3/4″ belt, I’ve came to prefer them because to me they are just a little more comfortable. But even with those it has became my daily casual belt.

  2. Brian says:

    I also sew and haven’t seen a creative fresh design in a while I felt made alot of sense. I hope you guys do very well!

  3. Desert Lizard says:

    I really like this idea.

  4. Huch says:

    I have 2 of these and like them a lot. They’re not as stiff as some of my other gun belts (Wilderness Instructors belt, etc.) but they work as advertised and are definitely stiff enough to hold a holstered gun and some mags. Not to mention that at $29, they were affordable enough for me to get a spare one just to leave one in my car with my go bag. I’d like to say it’s so I can have a good belt to strap on what I need to in case of emergency, but the reality is that I use it when I’m rushing out the door to a competition and realize when I got there that I forgot to bring my normal belt. Good idea, great price.

  5. davan says:

    hasn’t this been done in USPSA for the last 20 something years?

  6. Tod Rod says:

    What kind of holster is that?

  7. BrianK says:

    This has been the standard in competition shooting like USPSA and IPSIC since before I was born its not exactly a new idea.

    • Chris K. says:

      This is not the same as a CR speed or DA belt system, this is just one belt.

  8. MattCFII says:

    Has this split on one end belt been done before? It wouldn’t surprise me but haven’t seen one. If so do you guys have a link to another one? I’ve seen lots of inner/outer belt setups used, but not where just the last 1/3 or so splits open.

  9. Casey says:

    Seems to be aimed at a fairly small niche. For overt use, I think an inner/outer combination or war belt is the “A” answer, as it doesn’t require you to reposition a bunch of gear every time you put on your belt. For concealment, I use IWB holsters, so this product doesn’t serve any purpose for me. I guess it could have some application for low profile users who want to wear OWB holsters.

    • Bill says:

      Where I’m liking it is that, theoretically at least, if I understand the concept, I can get my holster, cuffs, spare mags, and flashlight on without my pants crashing to the floor……working in a casual uniform, I’m still loath to leave too much stuff behind, but a full on battle-belt might be a little much. For the price, I’ll give it a go, which will make the boss happy, cause when I do wear the micro battle belt it’s in ATACs FG. This should also allow the use of pouches with conventional belt loops, instead of having to fight with MOLLE.

      Of course, I see this after having some covert vests and equipment harnesses imported from Sweden last week.

      • Casey says:

        Fair enough. I work in security, not LE, so there’s no casual uniform for me. I’m either working in a duty belt or not working and carrying concealed. I have to say I would still prefer to thrown on an inner belt and duty belt rather than deal with threading a belt through multiple pouches, but that’s just me.

  10. Bill says:

    The holster looks like a G-Code

  11. Frank says:

    Hey if it works for you great but all those problems cab solved with a quality paddle holster.