This entry was posted
on Friday, October 30th, 2015 at 16:00 and is filed under Medical.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
13 Responses to “Sneak Peek – Gen 7 CAT by North American Rescue”
I’ve only had to apply a TQ once but it was for a femoral bleed.
It was definitely a challenge to keep the device from twisting and pinching, so stabilization is a thing. Also, windlass rods are a known point of failure even on legit product–to the extent that users are told to load the rod gradually as tension increases–not something everyone is likely to remember as they’re being sprayed with blood while they’re being shot at.
The biggest change is the single routed buckle. One method of application for arm or leg. Everything else is a strengthening or small improvement.
The single routed buckle probably came from a recent study (year or two ago) that looked at just how much velcro is needed to prevent tearing away when mechanical advantage is applied (windless). It was something like 6″-8″ is all that was needed, I can’t remember off the top of my head. What I am not sure of is if the length was changed, I doubt it as I think it would have been mentioned.
Nice upgrade, can’t wait to get hands on with them.
Only problem with having just one method of applying ie single loop is there is the potential that the Velcro if sodden with liquid or blood and in a dusty or muddy environment is that it does have a tendency to fail due to lack of adherence having the double buckle was an added fail safe in the event of that happening which is why it was upgraded with the teeth due to operational failures
I was able to talk to the NARescue guys and handle the new CAT at the IACP conference this past week. The windlass is noticeably more robust and the texture on the ends should also help.
Kind of skeptical about the single buckle. Just because they always pack them that way in the factory doesn’t mean that’s how they’re supposed to be used. Yes, the CAT is far easier to use one handed with a single buckle, but for anything other than self aid, you are more than likely going to have two hands available and a double buckle is not going to inhibit your ability to administer aid.
The double buckle is a safe bet overall. I think they should have gone with it, personally, especially if they want these to be issued from now on. Someone’s bound to complain about it later.
super excited!
link doesn’t work…
http://www.narescue.com
North America Rescue is http://www.narescue.com
(Unless the Chinese have turned their counterfeit efforts up to 11 and I’ve been buying fake gear all this time).
How is this more effective than the current CATS already out there?
Everything listed on the above graphic is a mod / improvement on the current model.
I’ve only had to apply a TQ once but it was for a femoral bleed.
It was definitely a challenge to keep the device from twisting and pinching, so stabilization is a thing. Also, windlass rods are a known point of failure even on legit product–to the extent that users are told to load the rod gradually as tension increases–not something everyone is likely to remember as they’re being sprayed with blood while they’re being shot at.
The biggest change is the single routed buckle. One method of application for arm or leg. Everything else is a strengthening or small improvement.
The single routed buckle probably came from a recent study (year or two ago) that looked at just how much velcro is needed to prevent tearing away when mechanical advantage is applied (windless). It was something like 6″-8″ is all that was needed, I can’t remember off the top of my head. What I am not sure of is if the length was changed, I doubt it as I think it would have been mentioned.
Nice upgrade, can’t wait to get hands on with them.
Only problem with having just one method of applying ie single loop is there is the potential that the Velcro if sodden with liquid or blood and in a dusty or muddy environment is that it does have a tendency to fail due to lack of adherence having the double buckle was an added fail safe in the event of that happening which is why it was upgraded with the teeth due to operational failures
I was able to talk to the NARescue guys and handle the new CAT at the IACP conference this past week. The windlass is noticeably more robust and the texture on the ends should also help.
If you look closely the new single buckle has teeth too.
It may have teeth but without a double feed buckle they are redundant you need the double feed to make them effective
Kind of skeptical about the single buckle. Just because they always pack them that way in the factory doesn’t mean that’s how they’re supposed to be used. Yes, the CAT is far easier to use one handed with a single buckle, but for anything other than self aid, you are more than likely going to have two hands available and a double buckle is not going to inhibit your ability to administer aid.
The double buckle is a safe bet overall. I think they should have gone with it, personally, especially if they want these to be issued from now on. Someone’s bound to complain about it later.