Primary Arms
«
»

Although a Glock, Robert Isn’t a Part of GLOCK

We received this press release earlier this evening concerning Robert Glock, son of GLOCK founder Gaston Glock.

www.glock.com

Tags:

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 7th, 2012 at 06:14 and is filed under Industry. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

11 Responses to “Although a Glock, Robert Isn’t a Part of GLOCK”

  1. TM says:
    November 7, 2012 at 07:01

    What did I miss?

  2. Ian says:
    November 7, 2012 at 07:58

    Did this Robert Glock attempt to speak for Glock or something? This seems a bit out of the blue.

  3. James says:
    November 7, 2012 at 10:50

    I assume this has to do with the election and Mr. Glock’s personal opinion…

  4. Strike-Hold! says:
    November 7, 2012 at 12:16

    Context?

  5. Dude Man says:
    November 7, 2012 at 12:45

    This has been going on for awhile. Lawsuits, embezzling, threats of takeover. Apparently an executive is being sued by The Glock family for embezzling from the elder Glock. Austrian problems.

  6. Cameron Bell says:
    November 7, 2012 at 13:54

    In July 1999 Charles Ewert, a business associate of Glock, hired a French ex-mercenary to murder Glock (who was 70 years old at that time[3]) with a mallet in a garage in Luxembourg in an apparent attempt to cover up embezzlement of millions from the Glock company.
    Although Glock’s injuries included seven head wounds and the loss of about a litre of blood, Glock was able to fend off the attack by striking the hitman twice. The hired killer, 67-year-old Jacques Pêcheur, was sentenced to 17 years in prison for the attack. Charles Ewert was sentenced to 20 years as a result of Pêcheur’s testimony.[4]
    [edit]

    • Haji says:
      November 8, 2012 at 14:56

      What kind of idiot sends a 67 year old hit man to kill a 70 year old guy? What did he expect to happen? Was he gonna bludgeon Gaston with his Merc-Certified walker or somethin’? Ewok…er…Ewert deserves more than 20 years just for being an idiot, and more than that for the crime.

  7. Jess Banda says:
    November 7, 2012 at 20:47

    This might explain:
    http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-02/un-friendly-fire-at-glock

  8. Matsucorp says:
    November 8, 2012 at 02:50

    Can’t nothin ever be simple eh?

    That was an interesting read.