AUSA - SIG SAUER MCX in 7.62x39 | Soldier Systems Daily Soldier Systems Daily

AUSA – SIG SAUER MCX in 7.62×39

This is a 7.62×39 variant of the MCX. Interestingly, it’s fitted with a new folding stock that has been developed for European security forces who wear helmets with ballistic visors. This pairing generally won’t be seen operationally.

www.sigsauer.com

Tags: Sig Sauer

This entry was posted on Monday, October 12th, 2015 at 21:00 and is filed under AUSA, weapons. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

19 Responses to “AUSA – SIG SAUER MCX in 7.62×39”

BillC says:

October 12, 2015 at 21:30

Now let’s see how many people comment about the stock without reading the text of the article.
- contractor says:
  
  October 12, 2015 at 21:56
  
  You can still go TOB with that stock so it wont matter to most people
  - BillC says:
    
    October 12, 2015 at 22:21
    
    Question Mark
    http://www.acronymfinder.com/TOB.html
    - contractor says:
      
      October 12, 2015 at 23:43
      
      Thumb Over Bore
      Humb Over Bore
      Umb Over Bore
      Mb Over Bore
      B Over Bore
      
      Over Bore
      Ver Bore
      Er Bore
      R Bore
      
      Bore
      Ore
      Re
      E
      - BillC says:
        
        October 13, 2015 at 01:43
        
        Town of Breckenridge
    - Collin says:
      
      October 12, 2015 at 23:50
      
      Toaster Oven Broiler
    - Matt says:
      
      October 13, 2015 at 05:39
      
      Toe of beaver.
- Thumb Over Bore says:
  
  October 14, 2015 at 18:57
  
  What’s up with that fucking stock man!?
BillC says:

October 12, 2015 at 21:31

Also, Oh Noz, an EOTech!
- Matt says:
  
  October 13, 2015 at 05:39
  
  That’s funny. I thought the exact same thing.
Jon, OPT says:

October 12, 2015 at 21:57

Been waiting for stocks to take this evolutionary step since helmet manufacturers started making mandible guards. Well played Sig, nice design.

Jon, OPT
- Reseremb says:
  
  October 12, 2015 at 22:18
  
  Couple models out there to provide a removable cheek piece if needed, but pricing in most of these ones is outrageous (400-500€)
- ThatBlueFalcon says:
  
  October 12, 2015 at 23:47
  
  B&T came out with this design for an MP5 almost a decade ago, if I remember correctly, but it doesn’t get a lot of visibility.
  - contractor says:
    
    October 12, 2015 at 23:54
    
    Yes they did, pretty cool design IMO
- AlexC says:
  
  October 14, 2015 at 01:37
  
  Paintball markers have had this stock design for a while now:
  http://s285.photobucket.com/user/Fuzzy_Monkey3/media/FC%20Schalke/242.jpg.html
  
  Having to a wear a mask to play games has forced marker accessory manufacturers to adapt.
BillC says:

October 12, 2015 at 22:19

Question Mark
http://www.acronymfinder.com/TOB.html
- BillC says:
  
  October 12, 2015 at 22:20
  
  Disregard. Supposed to have been a reply.
- mike says:
  
  October 12, 2015 at 22:22
  
  My money is on “Throne of Bhaal”
ARman says:

October 12, 2015 at 23:38

I know that magazines for 5.45 ARs are generally not as reliable ones made for .223/5.56. Do 7.62×39 AR mags have similar reliability issues? That may be the weak point in this endeavor.