35 Responses to “SHOT Show – Oakley Chamber”

1. J.H.S says:

   January 21, 2015 at 15:16

   I think they need to learn what “discreet” means in reference to concealing a weapon, and then go back to the drawing board. That is without a doubt the silliest pack/pouch Ive ever seen.

   • Dellis says:

     January 21, 2015 at 18:27

     Exactly!

2. HSD says:

   January 21, 2015 at 15:16

   If I wanted that, I’d go to Hill People Gear and get the real thing

   • tacticalyellowmessengerbag says:

     January 21, 2015 at 15:38

     +1

   • Justin M. says:

     January 21, 2015 at 15:55

     +1

   • straps says:

     January 21, 2015 at 16:34

     +1 more.

   • badjujuu says:

     January 21, 2015 at 16:41

     +1

   • praharin says:

     January 21, 2015 at 16:45

     It’s like someone at Oakley said “lets knock off the HPG Kit Bag, but make it in China out of cheap polyester, add some buckles to make it flashier… oh, and I can’t wait to see the price 😐

   • Colin says:

     January 21, 2015 at 18:31

     +1

   • SGT Rock says:

     January 21, 2015 at 19:19

     +1

   • Asinine Name says:

     January 21, 2015 at 20:57

     What they^ said.

   • Taylor says:

     January 21, 2015 at 22:24

     +1

     • Jason says:

       January 26, 2015 at 06:10

       +1

     • Brendan says:

       January 26, 2015 at 16:13

       +1, Hill People Gear for the win

   • Colefoz says:

     January 26, 2015 at 06:08

     I agree. The Hill brothers know how to make gear in a pragmatic manner! Their recon kit and Tarahumara are my go-to bags.

   • evan says:

     January 28, 2015 at 15:37

     obvious poor attempt to duplicate the HPG kit bag. Imitation is the best form of flattery but in this case done so poorly it’s not even a viable option. Oakley should stick to what they know, Glasses… and let the backpacking pros at HPG kit us out for the hike. Epic fail oakley.

3. Coastie says:

   January 21, 2015 at 15:19

   Discreet huh? =\

4. tdb says:

   January 21, 2015 at 15:27

   Looks like a poorly-executed ripoff of Hill People Gear…

5. Clay says:

   January 21, 2015 at 15:49

   That’s as far from discreet as you can get.

6. Preston says:

   January 21, 2015 at 15:53

   You’re better off concealing in a fanny pack than that “discrete” bag

7. John G says:

   January 21, 2015 at 16:18

   Doesn’t Kifaru make a pouch like this as well? The Koala I think?

   • straps says:

     January 21, 2015 at 19:24

     IIRC Kifaru’s Koala was done in collaboration with HPG’s founders.

     Each product has evolved in slightly different directions, and it’s great that folks have choices.

8. straps says:

   January 21, 2015 at 16:33

   That guy looks embarrassed to be in that photo.

   • Bluenoser says:

     January 21, 2015 at 16:33

     Backpack man is unenthused.

     • Asinine Name says:

       January 21, 2015 at 20:56

       ‘My agent, I keel heem!’

9. Greg says:

   January 21, 2015 at 17:36

   Front Toward Media

   • reverend says:

     January 21, 2015 at 19:57

     FTW! +1

10. Paul says:

    January 21, 2015 at 17:51

    “You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?”

    • reverend says:

      January 21, 2015 at 19:58

      ROBOT CHICKEN! +10000000000000000000000000000000000!!!!

11. Dellis says:

    January 21, 2015 at 18:29

    You’re mugger for the evening would say, ….Good evening sir. I’ll be your mugger this evening. Kindly unzip the front pouch and hand over the “discreetly hid firearm” Thank You.

12. reverend says:

    January 21, 2015 at 19:59

    Since it’s a “Discreet Pouch” why not just go all the way, and call it a “D-Bag”? Just askin’.

13. DA says:

    January 21, 2015 at 23:51

    The Borne Bjorn. The look on this guys face says it all – ” THIS is decreet?”

14. Hardcore Outdoor says:

    January 22, 2015 at 07:22

    HPG +1

15. Rob says:

    January 23, 2015 at 22:27

    Contrasting buckles and Oakley logo. On a chest pack. Discrete…
    I wonder if it has pockets that hold Pop Tarts…

16. Klein-karoo says:

    January 26, 2015 at 09:31

    No..just no.