SureFire

Archive for the ‘PEO-Soldier’ Category

PEO Soldier Change of Charter

Friday, May 4th, 2012

Today, Program Executive Officer Soldier will change hands during the Change of Charter ceremony at Fort Belvoir. This also marks the 10th anniversary of PEO Soldier as an organization. I am unable to attend due to a previous engagement but I want to wish MG Nichols well in her next assignment as commander of Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama and pass on my congratulations to BG Paul A. Ostrowski as he takes the reins of PEO Soldier. It is a dynamic organization and no other program office touches the lives of Soldiers more. Good Luck, Sir!

Soldier as a System

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

Feel free to download your copy of this publication here.

TRADOC Pamphlet 525-97 SaaS

US Army IOTV Laundering Saves $62 Million

Sunday, April 22nd, 2012

A few years ago there was a major shortage of Improved Outer Tactical Vest body armor systems. Two members of the Soldier Equipment Support Team, Life Cycle Logistics, Product Support Integration Directorate, Integrated Logistics Support Center, Natick Soldier Systems Center, studied the best way to commercially clean, rather than replace, IOTV garments. Willie Yung and Jason Sellazzo (seen above) found a method that has already saved the Army more than $62 million over two years.

They conducted a one-year study, sponsored by Product Manager Soldier Protective Equipment, in 2009-2010, using 90 IOTVs from the Central Issue Facility at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The vests were separated into nine groups of 10 each in three classifications: lightly, moderately and heavily soiled.

After the IOTVs were commercially cleaned three times each using four different methods in Nashville, Tennessee, they were sent to the Textile Materials Evaluation Team at Natick. Testing there revealed that commercial cleaning of IOTV components using “computer-controlled wet cleaning” was safe, effective, would result in huge cost savings over replacement, and would help ease any shortage of vests in theater.

“In 2010 and 2011, the Central Management Office has cleaned a total of 145,000 IOTVs,” Yung said. “And we estimate that by cleaning them, we have helped avoid spending over $62 million, because if they could not be cleaned, then the Army would have to buy new ones to replace them.”

Natick is currently working on a new contract to continue this money saving process. They are also looking at expanding the cleaning to other OCIE items beyond just the IOTV.

Congratulations MG Nichols

Friday, April 20th, 2012

We apologize for being somewhat remiss in recognizing Major General Camille Nichols for her well deserved promotion to that rank on 1 April 2012. MG Nichols currently serves as Commanding General of Program Executive Office Soldier.

In May MG Nichols will assume command of Army Contracting Command. Congratulations!

US Army Seeking Sources for Protective Over Garment

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

Product Manager – Soldier Protective Equipment (PM SPE) has issued a Sources Sought Notice for companies capable of producing the Tier II – Protective Over Garment (POG). Actually, this name is some what of a misnomer as it envisions a CBRNE garment rather than what it truly is; the outer component to the Pelvic Protection System which is used in conjunction with the Tier 1 Protective Under Garment (PUG).

According to the RFI, “The POG is worn over the Army Combat Uniform trousers and provides protection of the pelvis, femoral arteries, and lower abdominal organs in a blast or fragmentation event. The POG will also reduce the penetration of dirt and fine debris into a wound area to prevent infections.

For those of you unfamiliar with PPS, there are several variants currently in use from a variety of manufacturers.

At a minimum, the Tier II Protective Over Garment (POG):

– Shall consist of three (3) distinct areas of ballistic protection to provide an optimum balance of protection and mobility. The front section shall provide at least 69 in2 of ballistic protection, the center section shall fit between the legs and provide at least 50 in2 of ballistic protection, and rear section shall provide at least 52 in2 of ballistic protection for a size medium system.

– Front and rear sections shall provide ballistic protection which conforms to the base vest requirements of FQ/PD 07-05E. Center section shall provide ballistic resistance (V50) of at least 1120 ft/s against 17gr Fragment Simulating Projectile (FSP). Wherever there is no continuous ballistic material, a minimum 1 in. overlap shall be maintained to prevent gaps in coverage.

– Front, center, and rear ballistic materials shall be removable/replaceable.

– Ballistic filler areal density of front and rear sections shall not exceed 1.10 lb/ft2 with a maximum 0.30 in. thickness. Ballistic filler weight of center section shall not exceed 0.40 lb/ft2 with a maximum 0.10 in. thickness.

– Shall provide a secure fastening mechanism to prevent flapping or shifting during use. The system shall be compatible with currently fielded personal protective equipment and combat uniform and shall attach either to the body armor and/or the belt loops of the trousers.

– Front section shall be capable of being disconnected from the center/rear section and worn as a standalone item, with the option of fastening to the belt or Improved Outer Tactical Vest. Shall provide a secure fastening mechanism to prevent flapping or shifting during use.

– Attachment point(s) connecting the front section to center section must be able to withstand a peak load of 150 lbs break strength in accordance with ASTM D-5043

– Attachment points/seams connecting the rear panel to center section must be able to withstand a peak load of 600 lbs break strength in accordance with ASTM D-5043

– Shall be capable of donning and doffing without removing the belt from the Army Combat Uniform trousers

– Must be available in multiple sizes to fit 5th percentile female through 95th percentile male waist circumference.

– Outer facing cloth shall be constructed with the following camouflage pattern: US Army Operational Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern (OCP)

This is a short turn around on this Request for Information. Interested parties must reply no later than 4:00 pm eastern standard time on Wednesday, April 11 2012.

Jacobs Engineering Group Awarded PEO Soldier SETA Contract

Monday, April 9th, 2012

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc was recently awarded a contract with a ceiling of $157 million for Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance ( SETA ) support to PEO Soldier. The contract has a one base year and two one-year extension options.

SETA contracts are the life blood of many beltway contracting firms as well as their Government (primarily DoD) clients. Much of the day-to-day work in R&D and acquisition organizations which does not require decision making is accomplished by SETA contractors. Additionally, many SETA primes provide specialized expertise or rely on other subcontractors for this service.

The system may seem bloated and wasteful to some but it allows a Government organization to bring in experts for short periods of time to complete projects without bringing them on the payroll full time or letting a new contract each time a new project begins. Rather, a task order is issued to the SETA contractor and they work out the details with the Government client and line up the proper support team for the project. It’s actually both quick and efficient and allows the team to change dynamically as situations arise. Such Government-SETA contracts have allowed organizations such as the Rapid Equipping Force and PEO Soldier to deal so swiftly with ad hoc requirements from the field.

However, the relationship with SETA contractors has changed along with the current defense budget environment and they have become more streamlined. Take for example PEO Soldier itself. Working with Army Material Command, PEO Soldier was able to identify redundancies in support and with little fanfare transitioned to a smaller contractor footprint. Gone are the days of the Haymarket building filled with contractors. Yet, support to the Soldier hasn’t suffered.

PEO Soldier and other DoD organizations will continue to rely on SETA and other types of contractors. Remember, they offer a cost effective means for the Government to dynamically grow and shrink the work force without growing the size of the Government payroll itself.

NCI Information Systems Awarded PEO Soldier Support Contract

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

NCI Information Systems, Inc, Reston, VA, was awarded a $34,074,541 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract. The award will provide for the services in support of fully integrated soldier systems. Work will be performed in Middle River, MD; Fort Belvoir, VA; Fairfax, Va.; Fort Benning, GA; Sierra Vista, CA; Vint Hill Farms, VA; Kuwait; and Afghanistan, with an estimated completion date of September 23, 2012. One bid was solicited, with one bid received. The US Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, is the contracting activity (W91CRB-11-C-0076).

NCI Information Systems provides PEO Soldier Integrated Logistics Support.

PEO Soldier – Army Civilians “Shaping the Fight” – Precision Weapons Division

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

It’s amazing how far our Army has come over the past 10 years. Our Soldiers are the best equipped and most lethal in the world and it’s partially due to the hard work of the civilian workforce who have applied their skills and expertise to support the fight. This video from PEO Soldier is a great look at what they bring to the table and how they have improved the Army’s war fighting capability.

peosoldier.army.mil