TYR Tactical

Archive for the ‘PEO-Soldier’ Category

Army Conducting ‘Full-Court Press’ to Reduce Weight Soldiers Carry

Monday, March 14th, 2011

Army conducting ‘full-court press’ to reduce weight Soldiers carry” – That’s the title of latest story from the Army News Service discussing testimony provided last week by Army officials before the House Armed Services Committee on the Army’s budget and modernization. Afghanistan as you know is a very Soldier-centric environment and the Soldier serves as our most important combat system. Since the onset of hostilities in 2001 the Army has made huge strides to improve the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) of our Soldiers but it has come at a cost.

However, the article leads the reader to believe a couple of things that are untrue and hopefully, the article is incorrect and these same misstatements weren’t provided to Congress as testimony.

For example, according to the article the Army’s Vice Chief of Staff GEN Pete Chiarelli “said the Army has given Soldiers the option between the Improved Outer Tactical Vest and the new light-weight plate carrier. That provides a weight savings of 8 pounds…” Actually, the Army provides both systems but it is not up to the Soldier which he will wear but rather up to his chain of command. While it isn’t an out and out mistruth, it is a bit misleading. Individual Soldiers don’t get to apply METT-T and decide which PPE to wear.

He went on to state, “And the Army “continues to look at ways to further lighten body armor,” though he told lawmakers it’s not likely that the most common protective gear for Soldiers, the ceramic protective plates worn close to the body, could become lighter — because the technology isn’t there yet.

“I have not heard of any technologies now that will give us the required protection — as enemy capabilities continue to increase — at a lighter weight,” Chiarelli said.”

Once again, not entirely true. Industry can drop weight, but the Army doesn’t want to foot the bill associated with the reduction.

But, according the article GEN Chiarelli wasn’t the only one putting out incorrect info. LTG William N. Phillips, the military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) apparently hailed the Army’s new “Danner” boot due to its weight reduction. Unfortunately for him, the Army chose the Belleville boot instead. While the boots are very similar, the fact that a senior Army leader is passing out bad info is a bit disconcerting. What else is he getting wrong? It might be the tidbit about the “added” $5.8 Million for armor R&D. Yes, it’s a new line item, but the money isn’t. Most of it was pulled out of the old single line item that covered armor as well as Organization Clothing and Individual Equipment. Now they are separate.

Soldiers are our most precious resource. When it comes to their protection, we’re not opposed to a little gold plating. But please, no sugar coating.

Camo Boffins Get Ready!

Thursday, March 10th, 2011

Just in case the previous presolicitation message that was released via FedBizOpps on 28 Feb wasn’t enough, the Army issued ANOTHER presolicitation yesterday for the “U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Effort” (Solicitation Number: W911QY-11-R-0008). According to the notice, the actual solicitation will drop on 18 March, 2011 so nothing has changed there or anywhere else for that matter. Naturally, it’s a Friday which invariably means no weekend for those working at firms who will be competing. It seems there is an unwritten rule that all deployment orders and major solicitations are issued on Friday afternoon. To those involved; gird your loins. It seems that someone is excited enough about this to issue two presolicitations in as many weeks.

US Army Camo Improvement Effort Presolicitation

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

The Army issued a presolicitation yesterday for their Camouflage Improvement Effort. According to the notice, the Army continues to seek out the same things; three patterns, government use of the patterns rights, yada, yada, yada. According to the notice, the actual solicitation will be released 18 March, 2011. Folks in industry were getting itchy so it’s good to see that the Army put something out. Additionally, I am glad they have settled on a term to describe what the are doing although “effort” is somewhat unconventional in the acquisition world. It’s not a full program (although signature management should be) and it’s a bit more than a project at this point. Unfortunately, “effort’ doesn’t exactly instill confidence that it has staying power. I hope once this thing gets some legs under it they get to describe it in more enduring terms.

Read it and weep. www.fbo.gov

Kit Up! Learns a Little More on the XM25 Deployment

Saturday, February 5th, 2011

On Wednesday, we learned from PEO Soldier that troops are calling the XM25 the “Punisher” after several months and what was characterized of 100s of rounds expended in Afghanistan. However, after some digging Military.com’s Kilt Up! got some raw data on a couple of engagements involving the XM25. It seems as if the initial information received during the media round table was a bit more optimistic than the actual data may indicate. So head on over to Kit Up! and decide for yourself. And good job on Military.com for sticking to their guns on this.

More on the XM25 Deployment to Afghanistan

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

According to information released by COL Douglas Tamilio, PM Soldier Weapons, the XM25 deployment we wrote about last fall has been going very well. Despite the fact that the Army was only able to deploy five developmental systems to theater, the XM25 has been referred to as a “game changer”. In fact, BG Peter Fuller revealed to a group of journalists attending PEO Soldier’s media round table that while the Army still hadn’t come up with a name for the XM25, Soldiers certainly had. Dubbed the “Punisher” by troops, the XM25 is said to end engagements with enemy combatants in a matter of minutes. Soldiers fire the 25mm airburst munitions on enemy emplacements and return fire disappears.

The XM25 utilizes specialized 25mm airburst munitions that receive range to target information from the weapons sighting system. The weapon programs the grenade prior to launch and it detonates once it reaches the target. This allows the shooter to detonate the grenade above dug in adversaries or behind other forms of cover.

The only problem so far with the weapon is that there aren’t enough of them to go around. The Army is currently seeking funds for an additional 36 weapons but even once funding is secured, it will be at least a year before they are ready. As the program is still in Milestone B meaning it remains in development, no weapons or ammunition has been produced by the contractor in three years and there are no spares. Given a go ahead to produce more of both would require subcontractors to begin the work of hand building additional weapons and ammunition. At this point, production as we commonly perceive it does not yet exist for the XM25. Ammunition currently costs about $1000 per round for the hand crafted versions but COL Tamilio expects production versions to go for $35. If the program remains on its current schedule, the XM25 should reach Milestone C which is a production decision in FY2013.

When asked about future enhancements to the system, COL Tamilio responded that Soldiers are asking for increased range beyond the 500M for point and 700m for area targets to around 1000m. He felt that this was fully achievable but that everything is a balancing act and in order to increase range the warhead would have to be reworked. Additionally, such changes meant that new certifications would have to be completed which can take more than six months to accomplish. As far as weight is concerned, most Soldiers who have employed the weapon were not concerned with the current 12.5 lbs due to its effectiveness. And, most of these troops were carrying additional weapons for self protection. Finally, there is interest in developing a longer lasting battery since the current rechargeable is difficult to support in the field.

COL Tamilio also revealed that the idea to deploy the weapon to Afghanistan actually originated in his office and that a rudimentary plan had already been formulated before the Operational Needs Statement was received from OEF forces. This allowed them to rapidly support the ONS which was received 8 October, 2010 with a fielding 30 days later.

The systems were accompanied initially by training personnel but as they were used in combat by various small units in differing terrain they were always accompanied by a senior NCO from the Maneuver Center of Excellence as well as a Major from PM Soldier Weapons. During this period, 100s of rounds were expended in contact with the enemy. The Army Test and Evaluation Command is current writing a report on the XM25’s deployment which was formally referred to as a Forward Area Operational Assessment.

Based on information in the FOAA report, the Army will have a better idea of how the program should proceed. Additionally, the information may be used to validate operational employment concepts for the system. In the meantime, one thing remains certain. The Army has no plans to replace the newly fielded M320 40mm grenade launcher with the XM25. It will be purely a supplemental capability.

Bottom line to the new Congress…Free up some cash for the XM25 so we can keep this thing on track.

Belleville to be Awarded Contract for Mountain Combat Boot

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

During the PEO Soldier media round table earlier today, COL William Cole PM Soldier Protection and Individual Equipment, stated that the Army has finally chosen a design for the Mountain Combat Boot from Belleville under the Soldier Enhancement Program. As the REF continued to purchase the Danner candidate boot, this news comes as a bit of a surprise since Danner looked like the “shoe in”. The boot is designed as a mid height alternate to the standard issue combat boot and better tuned for use in Afghanistan’s terrain where Soldiers often have to scramble up and down steep rock faced slopes. According to COL Cole a contract award for 25,000 pairs is forthcoming.

Army Releases Draft RFP for Improved Carbine

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

The Army has taken yet another step toward fielding a new rifle. It has released a pre-solicitation draft Request for Proposals (Solicitation Number: W15QKN-11-R-F003) for a new rifle. Dubbed the Improved Carbine in Army documents, this new shoulder weapon is meant to replace the M16 family of small arms that has served for five decades.

Overall, the Army is looking for a weapon with these generic attributes:

The Individual Carbine will enable the engagement of enemy combatants with a highly reliable weapon system throughout the range of military operations and environments. The IC will also possess the ability to utilize current and future weapon accessories and optics through the use of an integrated rail system.

An important statement in the RFP is, “The Government has determined a need to find the best IC weapon that provides the best value to the Government.” Readers need to understand that the Army is not necessarily looking for the best weapon, but rather the best value. The term “best value” is determined based on a set of factors that have yet to be revealed to us. It may be cost, accuracy, lethality, or a combination of these or other factors. Ultimately, it may turn out that the best value for the Army is to do nothing, if it turns out that none of the candidate weapons presents a significant improvement over currently fielded rifles. Don’t forget, the Army is mitigating risk by pursuing a “dual path strategy” that upgrades currently fielded M4s while it investigates a new IC to ultimately replace them.

As we said awhile back, the solicitation is not caliber or operating system specific so it will be interesting to see what concepts are submitted.

The draft status of this RFP gives potential offerors the opportunity to submit questions to the program office before March 10th. In addition to the heads up, the Army is planning an Industry Day (Pre-proposal Conference) for the IC program on 30 March, 2011 in Crystal City. Once these two events have passed they will no longer respond to questions.

The entire draft RFP (Solicitation Number: W15QKN-11-R-F003) can be read at www.fedbizopps.gov.

Interestingly, while under two separate Program Managers, between the IC and Family of Camo programs, PEO-Soldier looks to have their hands full this year. Since the Family of Camo RFP has been already been delayed let’s hope the IC program stays on its current schedule.

Stuff We Didn’t Write About

Saturday, January 1st, 2011

The MM Action Figure

Ruger Scout Rifle

An Update on the Medium Rucksack

ADS Job Listings

Part II – How to Establish a Win-Win Relationship with a Cut and Sew Shop