SureFire

Posts Tagged ‘Canipe’

Canipe Correspondence – Winter’s Coming: Prepping Your Wardrobe

Saturday, September 1st, 2012

20120831-205849.jpg

I’m bad about waiting until it’s already cold to pick up cold weather gear. This year, I was anticipating a lot of days on the road, all over the country for the winter season and got a little ahead of my usual curve. I think it’s an important factor in your performance to be as comfortable as possible given the conditions you are in. I’ve been cold and wet enough to know that I don’t like being cold and wet. I also know that I don’t get any better at being cold and wet with practice so I just try to skip out on letting that happen to myself for the most part. I like a system consisting of a really thin base layer, a mid layer up top, a soft shell outer layer, and an optional loft layer and Gore-Tex hard shell layer. Couple that with the right accessories and for everything I need to do I’m usually covered.

For the base layers, I like merino wool. My go-to is the RHO line from Arcteryx or Mission Ready Equipment’s line from Icebreakers. The RHO stuff comes in two weights, one being really thin and the other being more substantial. The best way I can describe them is one is closer to a t-shirt, the other close to a sweatshirt. The MRE Icebreakers shirts come in short and long sleeve, and are uniform friendly for military wearers. All of the above layers are form fitting so if you don’t want it too tight buy a size larger. Depending on the conditions I’ll add a mid-layer up top that usually consists of the heavier RHO top or more recently the Naga hoody. The Naga is a fleece pullover with a form fitting hood that can easily fit under most helmets. Outdoor enthausiasts have been onto this for years and the tactical market is finally catching up.

20120831-211131.jpg

For my primary outer layer I like a soft-shell fabric. There are a multitude of options out there, some are very thin and light, some are thicker and feature a fleece backing. I prefer the lightweight Tweave Durastretch material, as I like the freedom of movement and breathability it offers over a less stretchy fleece backed material. I’ve also found that the Durastretch garments are usually very versatile and in dry climates can still be comfortable up to 75 degrees or so. Arcteryx makes extensive use of these fabrics in the Sphinx line for Military and LE users, as well as their civilian line. If I wear something heavier, Patagonia’s Guide Pant is a great option, and if you can find older ones with belt loops they’ll accommodate a gun belt. For a heavier jacket the Arcteryx Drac jacket is great, and is available in their Wolf color, which is much less attention-grabbing that Multicam or Crocodile for everyday use or uniformed LE wear.

20120831-211336.jpg

When temperatures take a dive or you will be in a static position, an extra layer of insulation is a must-have. I think the single best piece of clothing I own is the Atom LT jacket from (see a pattern emerging here…) Arcteryx. I’m not sure what kind of magic dust they sprinkle on that jacket to make it so awesome. It’s pretty much good from about 20 degrees to 60 degrees, and is indestructible. I got one from Grey Group Training in 2009 and it has survived rolling in dirt and gravel, snow, rain, sleet, countless cycles in the washing machine, airline baggage handlers, my dogs sleeping on it, and whatever else and still looks new three years later. It’s the Glock 19 of jackets, and everyone should have one. The Patagonia Nano Puff is a great option as well, but I found that mine lacks the ability to shed light rain as well as the Atom. I prefer these jackets to fleece because they’re generally warmer, lighter, more compressible, and provide another layer of defense against wind and precipitation. If it’s arctic weather, I’ll break out the Wild Things High Loft jacket. The “poofie” as we call it will keep you warm on a bird, hide, or turret no matter how low the temp drops. Rarely am I anywhere cold enough to call for it but when it does dip that low nothing else works as well.

I’ve found it’s best to select a lightweight waterproof-breathable top and bottom that can easily be packed and transported. I try and stick to genuine Gore-Tex products for it’s durability and resistance to breaking down when it comes into contact with petroleum based products. Some off brand membrane fabrics or DWR coatings lose their waterproofing when they come into contact with fuel or oil, and for professional military and LE users that’s a constant concern. Gore-Tex Pro Shell 2-layer material offers tremendous durability and weather resistance while still being lightweight and packable. I chose a set based on a minimal amount of features. For the rare occasion I wear it I want to it be waterproof vent well, I prefer to skip out on tons of pockets, velcro, powder skirts, and liners that only add weight and bulk. Many manufacturers use proprietary waterproof-breathable materials in lower priced jackets and Gore products in their upper level products. You get what you pay for.

20120831-205533.jpg

With all the effort many users put into clothing, an often overlooked piece of gear is gloves. Good gloves are hard to find. If they’re warm, they usually inhibit dexterity. If you can pick up a dime with them, you’re probably going to freeze. I usually wear thinner gloves in the cold and rely on a quarterback-style handwarmer from Cabelas to keep my hands warm. If I’m in conditions where I can’t do that, I wear Arcteryx Cam SV gloves or OR Swoop mittens. The Cam gloves allow me to still manipluate a firearm or radio, and the Swoop mitts fold back to expose your fingers, allowing you to form a firing grip or utilize touch screen devices.

There are a lot of companies making good clothing for colder weather, but putting together a full layering systems can be pretty costly. Many retailers offer sales periodically and if you shop around now you can still find some before the weather starts to cool off. Don’t be afraid to buy gently used or stuff from last season. If you are on a tight budget, surplus PCU layers can be had at a steal and is still pretty good stuff. Stay warm this winter, and check out the links below for some great stuff.

www.leaf.arcteryx.com
www.missionreadyequipment.com
www.patagonia.com
www.outdoorresearch.com/gov

Jon Canipe served on Active Duty with the US Army as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant at 5th SFG(A) and was a Senior Instructor at the JFKSWCS, training SFQC students in planning, unconventional warfare, small unit tactics, CQB, and advanced marksmanship. He is a veteran of multiple combat tours, and still serves in the Army National Guard’s 20th SFG(A) in addition to working as an industry consultant and small arms instructor.

Canipe Correspondence – Helmets: State of the Art Then and Now

Saturday, August 18th, 2012

Some readers are undoubtedly familiar with the PASGT helmet of old. The “Dome of Obedience”, “K-Pot”, “Clay Beret”, “Brain Wave Deflector” or any other number of unflattering names might come to mind depending on when and where you had to wear one. It was hot in the summer, cold in the winter, didn’t sit still on your head leaving blisters, or if it did sit still you were getting a migraine. There was nothing good about the K-Pot that I can remember now. Maybe it’s because it’s been over a decade since I wore one, and I’m spoiled by newer, better helmets. Maybe it’s because that helmet truly sucked. Fortunately, we’ll never have to put much thought into it, because helmet design and technology has come so far that most professional users don’t have to dread the call to put their helmets on any longer.

Around 2000, SOF Special Projects at Natick Labs developed the MICH (Modular Integrated Communications Helmet) as a replacement for the PASGT and other helmets in use by Special Operations units. It was of a French design (Gallet) and after being purchased by MSA, Berry compliant production began in the US in 2001 in a factory in VT, forever changing the way users looked at wearing a ballistic helmet. The MICH was a huge improvement over the PASGT, so much better in fact I have a hard time putting it into words because there’s not a metric to describe it. The MICH allowed users to finally stabilize night vision systems efficiently and conduct free-fall operations with its improved harness, remain comfortable and control perspiration with its 7-piece user configurable pad set, as well as fire from the prone and use integrated communications headsets (such as the Peltor or Sordin products) because of its interior and exterior profile. It’s around half a pound lighter than the PASGT. In addition, Soldier survivability was greatly increased due to a combination of the shell performance and the suspension system. The MICH allowed much less energy to be transferred to the wearer’s head in the event of a serious collision, be it with a bullet or a blunt impact from a fall or debris. Shortly after SOF adopted the MICH, it was adopted by the entire US Army as the ACH (Advanced Combat Helmet) program and still in use today. Safe to say, the MICH was an overwhelming success. Based on user driven requirements, the MICH design was further modified into the popular TC-2001 High Cut and TC-2002 Gunfighter Cut designs from MSA which are still widely in use around the world as well.

12 years after the arrival of the MICH/ACH and its variants, a few newer designs have gained a lot of attention. The Crye Precision AirFrame and Ops-Core FAST are the two we see primarily, both gaining lots of popularity in Special Operations and Law Enforcement communities. USSOCOM has begun fielding of the FAST helmet and can regularly be seen in media released by USASOC on the heads of Rangers and Special Forces Soldiers. Crye’s design is also in limited military use. Of note, Crye and Ops-Core seem to be the other’s stiffest competition but cooperate on numerous parts of their helmet systems. Both helmets are commonly seen shipped from the factory with Ops-Core’s excellent Head-Loc strap system, VAS Shroud, and ARC rails. In fact, the Ops-Core chinstrap system is the standard for the SOCOM issue MICH. Additionally, both helmets can be ‘up armored’ with additional armor pieces to increase the helmet’s ballistic coverage.

Ops-Core Ballistic FAST Helmet

The FAST helmet uses Ops-Core’s OCC Dial technology, which is also available as a retrofit kit for MICH style helmets. The system uses a headband that is tightened to the wearer’s head with a dial on the rear for custom fit, in addition to dual-density foam pads on top of the head. The system is extremely stable with night vision systems, especially heavier dual tube I2 goggles or Fusion systems. Ops-Core also boasts a 20% reduction in weight over traditional helmet materials due to their carbon/polyethylene blend shell composition. The helmet has strategically placed loop tape panels for IFF marking and battery pack placement, and usually is seen with Ops-Core’s popular VAS Shroud for NVG integration. They also include the proprietary ARC Rail for attachment of lights, goggles, MFF 02 masks and communications systems. Excellent covers in a variety of colors and camouflage patterns are available through FirstSpear, and should be a must-have for any end-user, reducing the slight shine found on uncovered helmets and offering increased camouflage in a wider variety of environments. In addition to widespread fielding by US SOF, the FAST is the issued helmet for the entire Norwegian Army. Something that may appeal to buyers is the availability of non-ballistic FAST (Bump) helmets as well, replacing cobbled together skateboard helmets with a purpose designed impact protection helmet.

Crye Precision AIRFRAME with Chops

Crye’s AirFrame uses a similar carbon-backed shell technology, a special version of the Ops-Core ARC rail system designed specifically for the AirFrame and Head-Loc chinstrap. Depending on the user, it may be fitted with an Ops-Core VAS Shroud or a Wilcox mount. Crye opted to use the MICH style pad set as opposed to a dial system of some sort, but the big thing you’ll notice about the Airframe is it’s unique shell shape…most prominently the huge vent in the top. The rear half of the two-piece shell rests under the front piece with some overlap, creating a rear-facing vent in the top of the helmet. The vent allows heat and moisture to escape out the top of the helmet, and also allows the rear on the helmet to fit closer to the wearer’s head for improved mobility, protection and fit. Crye offers a mesh helmet cover that is custom fit for the Airframe, maintaining its unique passive cooling properties. The Crye AirFrame can be ordered full assembled with NVG mounts in various hole patterns, ARC rails, and a cover, or stripped with only the shell and suspension system. One word of advice, make sure you can try one on. Some people have found they need a size larger in the AirFrame.

Onwards to the subjective stuff. I wore a MICH for a long time, and I’m lucky enough to have an AirFrame now. If I had to wear my MICH again I would gladly do it but the AirFrame is a huge improvement in comfort for me. What’s a fact is the tremendous weight savings over a helmet of the same capability a few years ago. The reduction in fatigue and potential injury due to the AirFrame’s greatly decreased weight is worth the price of admission. Check it out:

State of the Art, 2008

20120818-103320.jpg

MSA TC2000 helmet, medium
Ops-Core H-Nape
Ops-Core ARC rail
ITT ANVIS mount and low-pro battery pack with ground adapter plate
Norotos NVG plate
Oakley A-Frame assault goggles
MS2000 strobe
Peltor Comtac I
Crye Precision 1000D helmet cover

Total Weight: 6lb 4.6oz

State of the Art Today

20120818-103412.jpg

Crye AirFrame, size Large
Ops-Core H-Nape
Ops Core Airframe ARC rail
Ops-Core VAS Shroud
Wilcox FO4949 mount
Smith Elite Boogie goggle
S&S V-Lite
Peltor Comtac IV in ARC adapter kit
Crye Airframe mesh cover

Total Weight: 4lb 2.0oz

The numbers don’t lie. Removing 2lb 2.6oz off of the wearer’s neck during extended combat operations, while improving fit, function, and protection is a huge gain. Both helmets above share the exact same capabilities, it’s just that one does it 68% of the weight of the other while offering better protection. While the raw weights are closer of the two helmets alone, the improvements on the things we mount on them have also played a huge part in load reduction as well and should be factored in. If you still use a MICH/ACH you can save weight and improve function by upgrading mounting systems, eye protection, and IFF marking products.

If you’re due up for an upgrade on your ballistic head protection, take a look at Crye or Ops-Core. At least find ways to make you current setup lighter and more functional, as the head is one of the best places to try and reduce your load.

www.cryeprecision.com
www.ops-core.com

Jon Canipe served on Active Duty with the US Army as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant at 5th SFG(A) and was a Senior Instructor at the JFKSWCS, training SFQC students in planning, unconventional warfare, small unit tactics, CQB, and advanced marksmanship. He is a veteran of multiple combat tours, and still serves in the Army National Guard’s 20th SFG(A) in addition to working as an industry consultant and small arms instructor.

Canipe Correspondence – Behind the Scenes at Tac TV

Saturday, August 11th, 2012

Most shooters are familiar with Larry Vickers of Vickers Tactical. In addition to being a retired Army Special Forces soldier and member of our Nation’s most elite Special Operations unit for over 15 years, Larry is an extremely successful tactical trainer, industry consultant, product designer, firearms expert, and gunsmith.

Some readers may not be familiar with Larry’s latest project, Tac TV. Following the success of his previous show Tactical Arms, Tac TV is a 30-minute weekly show on The Sportsman Channel highlighting various weapons, tactics, and products relevant to the tactical professional or enthusiast. Recently, SSD was lucky enough to attend filming of a new episode of Tac TV in Apex, NC. LAV and guest host Clint Lynch were doing a special on the .300 AAC Blackout cartridge. With this round’s explosion in popularity (for good reason), Tac TV puts the .300BLK through it’s paces along side the venerable M4 and AK47. Look for this episode in October or November, just in time to decide on that new .300BLK rifle for Christmas.

Obviously LAV is the host and star of the show, but he is supported by a full production staff and special guest SMEs who come from varied backgrounds within the Special Operations community and tactical industry. On this season you can see decorated Navy SEAL and Centurion Arms founder Monty LeClaire, LAV’s fellow IDPA founders Ken Hackathorn and Bill Wilson, “Super” Dave Harrington, and numerous other experts passing their experience and expertise with viewers around the country.

Tac TV isn’t your usual YouTube firearms show in front of a webcam, it’s a fully staffed and supported television production for network TV. Filmed in HD on the same state-of-the-art equipment as major Hollywood titles, Silent R Productions its tremendous effort and skill into every scene, and it shows on screen. Tac TV makes full use of high-speed cameras, hi-tech audio capturing equipment, and Silent R’s tremendous production expertise to bring the best firearms show on TV.

If you have DISH network check out The Sportsman Channel, but if not, don’t fear. Tac TV recently went live with a fully featured web site allowing you to view all of Tac TV’s televised content as well. In addition to the televised episodes steaming on-demand, the web site offer additional content that is exclusive to the web site and opportunities to win thousands of dollars in prizes to include a custom Larry Vickers-built 1911 pistol. While you’re there, check out the Tac TV web store and Larry’s shooting challenge.

If you’re tired of watching shows about hacks building spray-painted AKs or shows about catty menopausal rich girls with your wife, check out Tac TV. You’ll be getting the best info out there from one of the most qualified experts in the industry. Special thanks to LAV, Eric, Cameron, Matt, and Jordan for having us out to check out the filming, and to Daniel Defense for providing all the ammo and rifles I burned up on the set.

www.tac-tv.com
www.vickerstactical.com
www.silentr.com

Jon Canipe served on Active Duty with the US Army as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant at 5th SFG(A) and was a Senior Instructor at the JFKSWCS, training SFQC students in planning, unconventional warfare, small unit tactics, CQB, and advanced marksmanship. He is a veteran of multiple combat tours, and still serves in the Army National Guard’s 20th SFG(A) in addition to working as an industry consultant and small arms instructor.

Canipe Correspondence – The Next Step in Handgun Sighting

Sunday, August 5th, 2012

Since the invention of the handgun in the 15th century mankind has been steadily improving the concept to what we are familiar with today.  It is quite possible that we are at a point where the notch-and-post sight configuration has reached it maximum potential, and red-dot sights for the handgun are becoming more mainstream.  This is a great trend for shooters for a number of reasons, but it also has a number of drawbacks that should be understood to ensure you have the capability you need when you need it.
 
Red dots on handguns might be more prevalent now than ever before, and that is certainly the case for tactical use.  However, it’s nothing new, and competition shooters have been aware of the benefits of the red dot for speed and accuracy for decades.  As far back as the 1960’s, bullseye shooters experimented with the Burris Bullseye Pistol Scope, and in 1975 Swedish manufacturer Aimpoint released the “Aimpoint Electronic”.  Following these in the late 80’s was the wildly popular Tasco ProPoint and C-More, both of which are still available today.  One does not have to look too hard to find any number of Aimpoint or C-More optics in the hands of  thousands of competitive shooters around the world.  These systems are remarkably effective for their purposes, but due to their size and durability were not practical for duty use.
 
For military/law enforcement/concealed carry use, the trend has just started to gain popularity over the last few years.  The Glock and Smith and Wesson M&P series lend themselves to being modified for direct acceptance of small red-dots. Additionally, dovetail adapters for many platforms are available that do not require costly permanent modification to the pistol.  David Bowie of Bowie  Tactical Concepts was an early adopter of small red-dot sights for duty use, as well as a pioneer in the machining of handgun slides to directly mount the sights.  Due to the fragile nature of some older sights, adoption by Military and Law Enforcement users was slow-paced for a few years.  Recently, with the release of viable optics by industry leaders, their use has skyrocketed and resulted in a huge growth in the development of mounting systems and support products.
 
The mini-red dot has a lot going for it.  It works the same as the Aimpoint or EoTech most people are familiar with on their rifles:  Put dot on target, apply fundamentals.  You can maintain focus on your target instead of the sight, which is something many shooters struggle with.  It removes the variable of aligning the rear notch and front post precisely on target, although it certainly does not make up for poor shooting ability and in no way acts as a substitute for solid shooting technique.  In fact, the new user will likely experience a period of growing pains where the dot is difficult to initially acquire, possibly gets lost in recoil, and is generally slower than when shooting irons until they become familiar with it.  Once the average shooter is familiar with using the new system they are likely to see improvement all around, although skills of high-level competitive shooters are at a level where they are so fast and accurate with iron sights the advantages of the dots might be less useful or even nonexistent.  People who suffer from visual impairments such as astigmatism or “old eyes” can really benefit from the dot, and may be able to regain a level of former accuracy that would have otherwise been impossible due to declining vision.  For military users, the ability to shoot through NVGs to preserve light discipline has been proven on the battlefield with the desired results.  The red-dot also offers a tremendous improvement in the ability to aim while moving, track moving targets, and shoot from unstable or asymmetric positions.  The cost is significant, generally more than the gun it’s going on, and you are tying yourself to a battery powered optic and hoping the electronics hold up to the violent forces of reciprocating on a handgun.  We are not out of the woods on that yet, but the popular modern optics that are suitable for duty use have a pretty admirable track record thus far.  Of note, open-type sights like the RMR, Docter, J-Point and MRDS have a diode that is easily occluded by dirt, precipitation, lint, etc. and can block the projection of the dot onto the lens.  Care must be taken to ensure that his doesn’t happen, on the tubular style sights (such as Aimpoints) the functional parts of the sight are sealed and this isn’t an issue.
 
Among the most popular sights for modern defensive handguns are the Aimpoint Micro T1, Trijicon RMR series, Leupold Deltapoint, and Insight MRDS.  All of these manufacturers are top-tier manufacturers with decades of experience in making electronics or optics for the tactical market.  There are pros and cons to each of them that the user will have to weigh and decide.  Direct mounting capability can be provided by Mark Housel at L&M Precision Gunworks, David Bowie at Bowie Tactical Concepts, and Doug Holloway at ATEI.  Coupled with suppressor height iron sights from Ameriglo, you can have a fast, accurate electronic sighting system with the reliable backup of traditional irons.  L&M also provides the ATOM system from Unity Tactical, which represents the current state-of-the-art mounting system for  handguns.  The ATOM gives the flexibility to use any of the popular red dots mentioned as well as traditional iron sights through the use of interchangeable mounting bases.  This allows the user to forego dedicating a slide to one specific sight only to have it rendered obsolete in the future.  With the ATOM, you simply get a new plate with the new sight’s footprint and you’re set.  This is a huge asset as small electronic sights are likely to evolve and improve in the near future.  Any of these setups can be concealable with the proper base gun and holster setup.  Support gear is available from Raven Concealment and Safariland among other smaller boutique kydex makers.  Safariland developed the excellent 6354DO holsters in conjunction with elite military units to accommodate the Docter, Insight, and Trijicon miniature red-dot sights and is unequaled for a duty rig with your dot.
 
Years ago, many rifle shooters were skeptical about the adoption of dot sighting systems, their reliance on batteries, failure of their circuitry, and other concerns.  Yet today, the battery powered red dot sight is an overwhelming success for duty use on rifles.  The same trend is possibly on the horizon for handguns, certainly the technology is at a point where users with a need for their capability would be wise to start looking into trying a red dot sight for themselves.

For more info, check out the following:

Unity Tactical

L&M Precision Gunworks

ATEI, Inc.

Bowie Tactical Concepts

Jon Canipe served on Active Duty with the US Army as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant at 5th SFG(A) and was a Senior Instructor at the JFKSWCS, training SFQC students in planning, unconventional warfare, small unit tactics, CQB, and advanced marksmanship. He is a veteran of multiple combat tours, and still serves in the Army National Guard’s 20th SFG(A) in addition to working as an industry consultant and small arms instructor.

Canipe Correspondence – What Are You Training For?

Saturday, July 21st, 2012

Years ago, as I was getting into attending open enrollment training courses, I heard someone refer to these types of training events as “The New Golf.” That phrase stuck with me as a pretty accurate description based on what I had seen, and it holds true today as much as ever. The customers that fall into this category have worked hard for their money, and like all free Americans have the right to spend it however they wish. In fact it is very encouraging to see such a surge in responsible, law abiding citizens seeking firearms and self defense training today, and I hope the growth seen in the tactical training industry continues indefinitely. My friend Ken Hackathorn says “Just by showing up here you’re already in the 0.1%” Over the last decade I have been fortunate enough to take part in dozens of classes, both open enrollment and more specialized closed courses for military and law enforcement personnel. Having been on both sides of the class as a student and an instructor, I have seen a huge cross section of people in attendance. I’ve noticed some trends I’d like to highlight and hopefully assist some people into making more informed decisions regarding their training. Regardless of your background they can apply to formal classes or individual practice.

To truly make the most of your time, effort, and money, the student needs to be realistic about their needs. As I write this, nothing rings more true as Fox News is covering the massacre in a theater in Aurora, CO. 14 people gunned down and 50 plus injured by one active shooter in a theater. I have heard the mantra “performance on demand” my entire career. I try to live that, because as dozens of people found out in the early hours of July 20, 2012 you don’t always get to choose when you will be called to the plate.

“He pointed the gun right at my face. I didn’t know what to do, so I jumped into the isle, curled into a ball and waited for him to go away.” -Jennifer Seeger, attendee of Colorado “The Dark Night Rises” showing.

We all need to look in the mirror by ourselves and take some time. We need to figure out where our time, effort, and money is going. Are you a corporate family man who spends 8 hours a week at the mall with your daughters? Are you training on the weekend with a battle rifle, plate carrier, drop leg holster, and helmet then rolling out to said mall with a J-Frame in a pocket holster? If you fit that description and passed up a SouthNarc ECQC class for that week of helicopter-borne free-fall knife fighting and heavy machine gun shooting, I believe some soul searching is in order. If you have the time and resources to do it all, then the rest of us are envious. For us mere mortals, we need to make our training count for the fight we will be in. As we decide to become hunters among the sheep, we have a responsibility to be professional and proficient with our skills. Choose your training wisely.

There is a potentially dangerous assumption by some people that you get all you need from your formal training. As an instructor I cannot make a person a master of anything we teach. As a student I cannot master a skill in 2-3 days a few times a year. You have to be willing to put the time in. An instructor can show you the way forward for success (or failure in some cases). You buy a bright, shiny set of tools when you train with professionals, but it is up to you to use them. There’s no doubt that it is a significant investment to train for the fight as it takes thousands of dollars to enroll in a top-level trainer’s course, buy ammunition, take vacation days, cover travel costs, lodging, food, and countless other small expenses. This isn’t sustainable for most people on a regular basis, but using those tools regularly on your own pays huge dividends for very little financial output. Dry firing is free. Drawing in front of the mirror costs nothing. Making sure your family knows what to do in various emergencies only costs you a little time and effort. We’ve all heard the saying “You never rise to the occasion, you fall to your level of training.” Train constantly.

There is a factor of success when your skills are called to the test that is overlooked with alarming consistency. Physical fitness is one of the most underrated factors of human survival today. I watched a video highlighting numerous professional competition shooters a while back. I would be lucky to be 75% the shooter they are, and with other obligations in life it’s unrealistic to think I could compete on their level. One thing is for sure, if the stage was at the top of a flight of steps I’d pass a lot of them. In open enrollment classes I have seen an encouraging number of armed citizens who are fantastic shooters. Unfortunately, many of them could not be counted on to employ those skills due to their physical conditioning. How large is a Wal-Mart? Are your kids on the other side of it when shots ring out? Is your office on the fourth floor? If its on fire can you run down the steps to safety without passing out? Can you carry or drag another human being to safety in an emergency? In short, does your level of fitness make you an asset or a liability? Being trained and prepared means more than carrying a gun, plus fitness improves all aspects of life. Get in shape and stay in shape.

We live in a time where everyday life is seemingly more and more dangerous. When you decide to take up training for the fight as a profession or a hobby, I think there is an obligation to take it seriously as your life and those of others is on the line. By applying some common sense in your approach to choosing training, being serious about maintaining your skills, and being mentally and physically prepared you are choosing not to be a victim. These principles are not all inclusive, but should provide a solid foundation for serious students when developing training desires and goals.

Good luck and stay safe.

Jon Canipe served on Active Duty with the US Army as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant at 5th SFG(A) and was a Senior Instructor at the JFKSWCS, training SFQC students in planning, unconventional warfare, small unit tactics, CQB, and advanced marksmanship. He is a veteran of multiple combat tours, and still serves in the Army National Guard’s 20th SFG(A) in addition to working as an industry consultant and small arms instructor.