Celebrate 20 years of the TLR-1

Archive for the ‘SOF’ Category

From Backpacks to Bird’s-Eye: Drones Transforming EOD at Hurlburt Field

Wednesday, February 11th, 2026

Across a stretch of open terrain at Hurlburt Field, Florida, two 1st Special Operations Wing Airmen began a race between machines. One guided a ground robot toward a simulated casualty, its treads working across dirt and grass. The other launched a small unmanned aerial system, or drone, which reached the site within seconds. From above, the drone’s camera streamed a clear view of the scene before the robot made it halfway there.

It’s a new kind of flight reshaping how Explosive Ordnance Disposal Airmen execute their mission—and how the Air Force strengthens readiness through innovation. Before the adoption of modernized drones, EOD teams relied primarily on heavy robotic platforms to inspect potential explosive threats. The systems still provide valuable standoff capability but require vehicle transport and setup time, limiting their use during dismounted operations. In those scenarios, Airmen may have to approach hazards themselves.

Compact and portable drones can now be carried in a backpack and launched within minutes. Operated from a safe distance, they stream real-time imagery that helps Airmen assess hazards without approaching them. The drones give teams an unmatched view of any environment. They combine optical and thermal cameras for day or night operations with advanced 3D scanning that produces precise digital models in minutes, whether documenting blast sites or mapping entire airfields.

Drone imagery can be used to establish a visual reference of a runway and to collect updated imagery after an incident. The data helps civil engineers quickly identify changes or damage, supporting timely clearance actions and repair planning to resume air operations.

Built-in artificial intelligence also allows drones to operate with a high degree of autonomy. The system can identify and track targets, hold position, and navigate around obstacles with minimal operator input. These capabilities boost mission tempo and efficiency while augmenting the work of Airmen, keeping them out of harm’s way and allowing them to focus on critical decision-making.

Drones have not yet replaced every function of traditional robots, but the two technologies currently complement one another on the battlefield. “The big thing [a drone] doesn’t currently have is manipulation,” explained an 1 SOW Airman. “I can’t pull a battery off something or flip something over [with a drone], but a robot can.” Still, drones are increasingly assuming tasks once limited to ground platforms, expanding options for commanders and reinforcing the Air Force’s ability to adapt faster than its adversaries.

Introducing any new technology brings challenges, but EOD Airmen at Hurlburt Field have moved quickly to overcome them. Through local innovation projects, the team acquired and tested drones early, giving them a head start in integrating the capability into daily operations. “We’ve had the ability to work through a lot of the growing pains much faster,” said a 1 SOW Airman. “Now we’re able to disseminate those lessons throughout the career field.”

That progress continues as Airmen refine training and certification standards while identifying where drones provide the most operational value. “A lot of this is going to fluctuate based on use cases, because we all have a general idea of how we’d want to use this… but there’s still a lot to learn,” said an Airman.

1 SOW Airmen emphasized that the success of drone integration depends as much on institutional understanding as on technology itself. They said progress requires high-level advocacy to navigate the policies and risk assessments that come with operating in shared airspace, along with trust between ground units employing the systems and aviation communities managing them. As one Airman explained, the future fight will rely on an enterprise that adapts quickly and learns from those already proving what’s possible.

At Hurlburt Field, 1st SOW EOD Airmen are showing how small systems can yield big results. The shift from large ground robots to backpack-sized drones is transforming how they detect, respond, and recover—bringing speed, precision, and safety to every mission. “These are coming. This is the way of the future,” said a 1st SOW Airman. “If it’s not in your shop currently, it probably will be in the very near future. Get ready.”

Story by Alexandra Broughton 

Headquarters Air Force, Office of the Director of Civil Engineers

USSOCOM Rapid Capability Assessment Event 20-24 April 2026

Tuesday, February 10th, 2026

SOFWERX and ICWERX, in collaboration with USSOCOM’s Directorate of Science and Technology (S&T) and the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) Directorate of Science & Technology (DS&T), will host the seventeenth Rapid Capability Assessment event (RCA17) 20-24 April, 2026, in Chantilly, VA, with the theme “Field-Forward Operations – Future Challenges for SOF and the IC in Data Dense Environments.”

Field-forward operations refer to the real-time or near real-time collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination of intelligence information in the field or at the source to support mission planning and tactical decision making. These activities rely on advanced technologies, including diverse sensors, smart systems, distributed networks, communication platforms, and AI-driven analytical suites. While these technologies offer significant advantages by providing actionable insights in real-time, they also introduce vulnerabilities (e.g., data reliability and accuracy, cybersecurity, processing speed, and energy efficiency). Addressing these vulnerabilities is crucial for maximizing the potential of these technologies while minimizing risks, thereby enabling mission success.

To address these challenges, SOF & the CIA will need to:

  • Develop a vision for the future challenges posed by data dense intelligence operations
  • Identify and understand risks, vulnerabilities, and adversarial actions that threaten these operations and take appropriate measures with partners and allies at machine speed
  • Develop plans and policies to enable operational advantage in global field environments and exploit dual-use capabilities
  • Identify, recruit, and train for the skillsets required to conduct future interagency field-forward operations 

Participants will also have the opportunity to provide input to other teams who are working in other focus areas: 

  • Advanced Analytics: Explores how Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)-like systems and Mixture of Experts models can assist with intelligence analysis, with a focus on ethical and secure deployment.
  • Mapping Building Infrastructure: Investigates conventional and unconventional methods of integration with intelligent building systems such as lighting, fire suppression, and HVAC.  
  • Novel Energy Sources: Focuses on efficiently generating, storing, and managing power in low-profile installations, including heat mitigation techniques for confined or off-grid environments.
  • Data Communications/Exfiltration: This focus area has two prongs: one focuses on globally dispersed, low-power edge sensors that can operate independently while triggering more complex systems through tipping and cueing; the second explores secure, high-throughput, and low-signature data transmission in both fixed and mobile environments.  
  • Edge Device Optimization: Focuses on maximizing processing efficiency of globally dispersed, low-power edge sensors that can operate independently while triggering more complex systems through alerting, tipping, and ranging. 

The outputs from the event include:  

  • A subsystem-level architectural breakdown of the capabilities developed during the event  
  • Identified risks, constraints, policies, regulations, etc., impacting the capability
  • Analysis of the ways and means through which the capability may achieve desired effects  
  • Initial market research of potential technology performers with appropriate expertise
  • A technology development roadmap to identify potential paths forward to implementation 

USSOCOM S&T has developed and refined a unique process, the Innovation Cycle, to engage technology pioneers and leaders to discover and develop high risk, innovative, and disruptive concepts, capabilities, and technologies for future on-boarding.  

A predecessor event, Innovation Foundry 17 (IF17), was the first phase of the Innovation Cycle and was focused on idea generation. RCA17 will build upon this foundation by bringing together experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories, to collaborate with Special Operations Forces (SOF) and CIA personnel to decompose the IF17 outputs through facilitated exercises using systems engineering frameworks.

For more information, visit events.sofwerx.org/rca17.

Submit NLT 26 February 11:59 PM ET

U.S. Citizens Only

* image by Grok

SOFWERX – PEO-TIS Handheld High Frequency Radio Industry Day

Thursday, February 5th, 2026

SOFWERX, in collaboration with USSOCOM Program Executive Office Tactical Information Systems (PEO-TIS), will host an Industry Day on 3 March 2026, to gain a better understanding of the current market and the technical capabilities of Handheld High Frequency (HF) Radio systems. 

USSOCOM has a critical need for reliable and secure Beyond-Line-of-Sight (BLOS) communications for dismounted warfighters operating in a variety of challenging environments, including areas with limited or no satellite coverage. Handheld HF radios are a key component of our communications strategy, providing a resilient and autonomous solution for long-range voice and data transmission.

This event is seeking information on handheld HF radios that are currently available or could be readily adapted to meet USSOCOM’s operational requirements. PEO-TIS is interested in capabilities that are lightweight, rugged, and offer advanced features to enhance communications in contested environments.

Request to Attend NLT 11 February 2026 11:59 PM ET

U.S. Citizens Only

U.S. Companies Only 

For more information, visit events.sofwerx.org/peo-tis-handheld-hf-radio-industry-day.

Draganfly Selected to Provide Draganfly Flex FPV Drones and Training to US Air Force Special Operations Command Units in Partnership with DelMar Aerospace

Monday, February 2nd, 2026

Tampa, Fla. —  February 2, 2026 — Draganfly Inc. (NASDAQ: DPRO; CSE: DPRO; FSE: 3U8A) (“Draganfly” or the “Company”), an award-winning developer of drone solutions, software, and robotics, today announced an award to provide Flex FPV Drones and Training to U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command units with partner DelMar Aerospace Corporation, a leading provider of advanced uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) training, tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), for U.S. Government customers. 

The partnership with DelMar brings together Draganfly’s operationally proven uncrewed platforms with DelMar Aerospace’s expertise in delivering cutting-edge, mission-relevant UAS instruction to Government operators. Initial training activities include First Person View (FPV) UAS instruction, with a comprehensive curriculum covering FPV assembly, repair, flight operations, advanced mission planning and execution. 

The award is to provide foundational FPV training with Draganfly Flex FPV Drones to U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command units. Training will take place at DelMar Aerospace’s Camp Pendleton UAS range training facility, a controlled environment purpose-built to support advanced instruction that replicates a range of battlefield scenarios. The first training cohort is scheduled to begin in mid-February. 

Draganfly’s Flex FPV serves as the modular backbone for future small UAS configurations, uniquely capable of meeting evolving Department of War operational requirements. The Flex FPV’s innovative design enables rapid transition across operating profiles, allowing a variety of flight characteristics and payload capacities to be deployed with a single unit. This adaptability enables widespread adoption via a common training and sustainment baseline while providing a unique and compelling value proposition to any tactical drone program.

 “Our shared focus is on readiness and combat capability,” said Cameron Chell, CEO of Draganfly. “Partnering with DelMar Aerospace helps ensure operators are training on systems and tactics designed for real-world conditions, with the Flex’s modularity and reliability required to adapt as missions and threats evolve.” 

DelMar Aerospace will lead instruction delivery, curriculum development, and standards alignment, ensuring training remains tactically relevant while compliant with U.S. Government contracting and security requirements. 

“This collaboration is about developing operators who are prepared to employ uncrewed systems effectively in demanding environments,” said Stanley Springer, DelMar Aerospace’s Chief Operating Officer. “Our focus is disciplined training grounded in combat-proven TTPs and operational realism.” 

This announcement reflects ongoing work in support of U.S. Government programs. Specific operational details are not being disclosed.

Military Kayaks in Special Operations: A Quiet Lineage

Saturday, January 31st, 2026

Introduction

The use of kayaks or canoes more broadly for military operations is nearly as old as the craft themselves. Inland and coastal waterways have served as arteries of commerce, migration, and conflict since antiquity. With the introduction of engines, human-powered watercraft largely faded from conventional military use, surviving primarily in sport, recreation, and a narrow but enduring niche: special operations.

This article provides a focused overview of the military kayak’s role from the Second World War to the present day. It is not an exhaustive history, but rather a snapshot of how a simple platform when paired with disciplined fieldcraft has enabled stealth, endurance, and access disproportionate to its size.

World War II: The Birth of Modern Military Kayak Operations

Early in the Second World War, British forces recognized the potential of kayaks for clandestine maritime raiding. One of the earliest and most influential proponents was Major Herbert “Blondie” Hasler, an accomplished canoeist who understood that small, purpose-trained teams moving silently along rivers and coastlines could strike targets inaccessible to conventional forces.

Hasler proposed a solution to a persistent operational problem: German shipping operating from the occupied port of Bordeaux, which had proven difficult for British Bomber Command to interdict. His plan envisioned a ten-man raiding force launched by submarine outside the mouth of the Gironde Estuary. From there, the team would paddle more than eighty miles during periods of limited visibility, emplace limpet mines on enemy shipping, and then evade by any means available, with the ultimate goal of returning to the United Kingdom.

This mission later known as Operation Frankton became one of the most iconic special operations of the war and was immortalized in books and film under the title The Cockleshell Heroes.

Operation Frankton validated the concept of kayak-borne raiding and directly influenced the development of British maritime special operations doctrine. During this same period, multiple parallel kayak development efforts were underway in the United Kingdom, refining folding designs and techniques that would later inform the Special Boat Service (SBS) and allied units.

The Pacific Theater: Operation Jaywick

Kayak operations were not confined to Europe. In the Pacific Theater, the Allied Z Special Force demonstrated the strategic potential of kayak infiltration during Operation Jaywick.

Six men, operating from three kayaks, infiltrated Singapore Harbor and emplaced limpet mines on Japanese shipping. The operation resulted in the destruction or serious damage of approximately 39,000 tons of enemy vessels.

Jaywick confirmed that kayak-based operations could succeed even in heavily defended ports and reinforced the kayak’s role as a viable platform for strategic raiding when employed by highly trained personnel.

Post-War Continuity: The Rhodesian SAS

Following the Second World War, kayaks remained in service with special operations forces in the United Kingdom, Europe, Africa, Asia and the United States. One of the most compelling post-war examples comes from the Rhodesian Bush War.

The Rhodesian SAS employed kayaks and canoes as low-signature insertion platforms along major waterways, particularly the Zambezi River and its tributaries. Among these missions, one operation stands out for its duration and austerity: a small SAS element inserted by kayak and operated entirely waterborne for approximately five weeks.

The patrol lived out of their boats, sleeping offshore in the kayaks or briefly ashore in concealed shoreline hides. During this period, they conducted persistent shoreline reconnaissance, surveillance of infiltration routes, and limited raids against insurgent logistics nodes, camps, and river crossings.

Kayaks enabled silent night movement, an extremely low visual and acoustic signature, and continuous repositioning without reliance on fixed bases, vehicles, or aircraft. This operation remains one of the most extreme examples of fieldcraft, endurance, and waterborne stealth in modern special operations history. Conceptually, it aligns more closely with Second World War SBS and Combined Operations Pilotage Party (COPP) missions than with later helicopter-centric SOF models.

Cold and Littoral Operations: Pebble Island, 1982

In May 1982, during the Falklands conflict, British special operations forces again demonstrated the value of kayak infiltration. Prior to the raid on Argentine aircraft positioned on Pebble Island, a small SAS reconnaissance element conducted a covert insertion by kayak.

Launching at night from offshore, the team paddled in extreme South Atlantic weather to avoid detection. Once ashore, the kayaks were cached and the patrol transitioned to foot movement to conduct reconnaissance of aircraft disposition, defensive routines, and terrain.

This reconnaissance directly enabled the success of the subsequent raid and reaffirmed a long-standing lineage of British waterborne special operations doctrine: small teams, operating independently, emphasizing endurance, precision, and stealth in austere environments.

Years later, during a training rotation at the Mountain Camp in Salalah, Oman, I had the opportunity to hear a firsthand account of this operation from Brumby Stokes, one of the four-man SAS team who conducted the paddle and reconnaissance. Hearing the details directly from a participant reinforced how demandingand how deliberately understated these operations were.

Pebble Island remains a textbook example of kayak-based SOF infiltration enabling decisive follow-on action: quiet access, accurate intelligence, and a surgically executed assault.

Personal Reflections: A Living Lineage

My own journey with military kayaks began long before operational use, sparked by Second World War films such as The Cockleshell Heroes and Attack Force Z. Those stories planted an early appreciation for the concept long before I understood the discipline behind it.

When I arrived at 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne), I sought assignment to an Underwater Operations Detachment commonly referred to as a dive team. Within three months, I had completed pre-scuba training and the Combat Diver Qualification Course (CDQC). My first deployment took me to Aqaba, Jordan, where kayak infiltration using Klepper folding kayaks was one of the methods we rehearsed.

Over the course of my career, we used kayaks for infiltration training, mothercraft launches, helocasting, and shore insertions. They were also used for long-distance paddling as physical training, team building, and on occasion as improvised fishing platforms. We rehearsed operational employment during a counter-narcotics mission that was ultimately cancelled due to circumstances outside our control.

As my responsibilities increased, culminating in my role as Command Diving Officer for 5th Special Forces Group, I came to appreciate the quiet value of having kayaks available in the dive locker and on team deployments. They represented a direct lineage to the OSS Maritime Unit and to allied formations such as the SBS and Z Special Force.

Preserving the Craft

Today, I am fortunate to own one of the original 5th Group Klepper kayaks, acquired when U.S. Special Forces transitioned to the American-made Long Haul variant. When I received it, the kayak consisted of mismatched parts in poor condition and was missing its hull skin entirely.

Over several months, I restored the frame to operational condition and sourced a new skin from Long Haul, which at the time held the U.S. repair contract for the original German Kleppers. Configured in a one-man expedition setup, the kayak is now used for physical training and personal stress relief a functional reminder of a demanding and enduring tradition.

Conclusion

Kayaks remain in use by military and special operations units around the world. While rarely employed, they persist as a specialized capability within the maritime toolkit reserved for missions where stealth, endurance, and access outweigh speed or mass.

From Bordeaux to Singapore, the Zambezi to the Falklands, the military kayak has repeatedly proven that sophisticated effects do not always require complex machines. Sometimes, a paddle, patience, and exceptional fieldcraft are enough.

About the author:  Travis Rolph is a retired Airborne Infantry and Special Forces veteran and founder of Mayflower Research & Consulting.

How a Perpetual Desire for Innovation and Thinking ‘Outside the Box’ Led William P Yarborough to Create the Green Berets

Sunday, January 18th, 2026

In the rigid world of military tradition, true innovators are rare. Even rarer are leaders who respect tradition yet willingly break with convention when the mission demands it. Lieutenant General William Pelham Yarborough was one of those men—a visionary whose creativity, intellectual curiosity, and willingness to challenge orthodoxy when circumstances required, helped define the identity of the U.S. Army’s Special Forces. Remembered today as the ‘Father of the Modern Green Berets,’ Yarborough’s legacy extends far beyond a title; it lives on in the culture, symbols, and mindset of America’s most unconventional soldiers.

A Mind Built for Innovation

Born in 1912 to a military family in Seattle and raised largely in Georgia, Yarborough entered the U.S. Military Academy at West Point during a period when doctrine and hierarchy ruled Army thinking. Commissioned in 1936 as an infantry officer, he began his career overseas in the Philippines. From the outset, his assignments revealed a pattern that would define his professional life: identify a difficult problem, ignore unnecessary convention, and design a practical solution.

That pattern became unmistakable after his transfer to Fort Benning in 1940. As a test officer with the 29th Infantry Regiment—and soon after as an acting captain commanding Company C, 501st Airborne Battalion—Yarborough found himself in the embryonic world of U.S. airborne forces. There, he applied both artistic sensibility and engineering logic to the challenges of a new form of warfare. He designed the Army’s metal parachutist qualification badge (which he later patented), the M42 “jump” uniform, specialized jump boots, and a range of air-droppable equipment containers. These were not cosmetic contributions; they were functional innovations that helped turn airborne theory into combat reality complete with an Esprit de corps.

Unit photograph, Company C, 501st Airborne Battalion, Fort Benning, GA, 1940. Captain Yarborough (the Company Commander) is sitting in the front row, second from the right.Photo by Gary Wilkins, 1st SFC PAO.

Capt. Yarborough boards a C-39 troop transport aircraft. Photo by The Army Historical Foundation.

Leadership Under Fire

During World War II, Yarborough’s unconventional mind was paired with combat leadership. In 1942. While serving in England as an airborne advisor for Operation Torch, he helped plan the first U.S. combat parachute operation, which landed American paratroopers (himself included) in French North Africa. The following year, as commander of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion at Anzio, he demonstrated that creativity did not come at the expense of discipline. Under fire, he demanded high standards, proving that unconventional thinking and strict professionalism were not mutually exclusive.

Diplomacy, Discipline, and the Cold War

After the war, Yarborough’s adaptability placed him in another complex environment: Allied-occupied Vienna. From 1945 through the mid-1950s, he served as Allied provost marshal, working daily with British, French, and Soviet forces. In this tense Cold War setting, he helped establish the famous four-power “International Patrol,” a mission that required restraint, cultural awareness, and constant negotiation—skills that later became hallmarks of Special Forces operations. His later assignment as deputy chief of the U.S. Military Advisory and Assistance Group in Cambodia further expanded his understanding of unconventional warfare and foreign internal defense.

The “International Patrol” later became informally known as “four men in a jeep,” a phrase that echoed the wartime Hollywood film Four Jills in a Jeep. One of the film’s stars, Martha Raye, would later become one of the most devoted and visible supporters of U.S. Army Special Forces. The connection is an interesting historical footnote: a reminder that Yarborough’s work in Vienna operated not only at the tactical and diplomatic level, but also within a broader cultural context that would later intersect with the Special Forces community in unexpected ways.

Colonel Yarborough serving as the Allied military Provost Martial in post-war occupied Vienna. Photo by The Army Historical Foundation

Forging the Green Beret Identity

Yarborough’s most enduring impact came in the early 1960s when he was appointed commander of the U.S. Army Special Warfare Center. At the time, Special Forces existed, but their identity—and institutional acceptance—remained fragile. Yarborough understood that elite units require both rigorous training and a unifying symbol. In 1961, he took a calculated risk by arranging for Special Forces soldiers to wear their green berets during a presidential review at Fort Bragg, despite the headgear lacking official authorization.

President John F. Kennedy, who himself held considerable interest in unconventional warfare, noticed immediately. When he asked Yarborough about the berets, the general seized the moment to explain. The result was a White House directive authorizing the green beret as the exclusive headgear of U.S. Army Special Forces. With that decision, Yarborough gave the force not just a uniform item, but an identity—one that signaled independence of thought, adaptability, and quiet professionalism.

Brigadier General Yarborough, wearing his green beret, in a discussion with President Kennedy during the president’s inspection of Special Forces personnel while visiting Fort Bragg in 1961. Photo by The Army Historical Foundation

As SWC commander, he also reshaped training. He expanded the curriculum to include military assistance, unconventional warfare, counterterrorism, and mandatory foreign-language instruction. Just as important, he fostered an environment where intellectual curiosity and creative problem-solving were expected. His vision was clear: Special Forces needed to be thinkers as much as fighters.

Senior Command and Global Perspective

In the latter stages of his career, Yarborough served in some of the Army’s most demanding senior roles. He represented the United Nations Command as chief negotiator at Panmunjom, dealing directly with Chinese and North Korean counterparts. As a lieutenant general, he commanded I Corps in Korea and later served as chief of staff and deputy commander in chief of U.S. Army Pacific. Across these assignments, his unconventional mindset remained intact, even extending to personal gear—such as his modified Air Force N-3B parka, altered to meet his own practical standards rather than rigid regulation.

Close up view. Captain Yarborough first row, second from right, Photo by Gary Wilkins, 1st SFC PAO.

A Legacy Etched in Steel

Yarborough’s influence did not end with his retirement. Beginning in 2002, graduates of the Special Forces Qualification Course were awarded the serial-numbered “Yarborough Knife,” a tangible link between new Green Berets and the man who forged their professional identity. Though later cost constraints severely limited its distribution, the knife remains one of the most powerful symbols of excellence and heritage within the Special Forces community.

LTG Yarborough’s personal customized USAF N3B winter parka, worn during his command of I Corps in the Republic of Korea. Photo by Gary Wilkins, 1st SFC PAO.

By Mr. Gary Wilkins, 1st Special Forces Command

Lieutenant General William P. Yarborough did more than design equipment or authorize a beret. He shaped a culture. He believed in a “new breed of man”—one who could think independently, adapt quickly, and succeed in the world’s most ambiguous and dangerous environments. Today’s Green Berets, operating across cultures and conflicts, continue to embody that vision. In their mindset, methods, and symbols, the legacy of Yarborough’s unconventional genius endures.

By Mr. Gary Wilkins, 1st Special Forces Command

SOFWERX – FOSOV: Vehicle Telematics and Sensor Technologies Assessment Event

Thursday, January 8th, 2026

SOFWERX, in collaboration with USSOCOM SOF Acquisition Technology and Logistics Program Executive Office SOF Warrior (AT&L PEO-SW), will host a series of events to facilitate product development and/or acquire existing commercial vehicle solutions. The Non-Standard Commercial Vehicles (NSCV) program seeks novel solutions to mitigate the freedom of movement risks associated with modern vehicle telematics systems that contain advanced sensors, GPS, communication systems, and unique data signatures.

As vehicles become increasingly connected, equipped with advanced sensors, GPS systems, and communication modules, they generate vast amounts of data and emit unique signatures. These signatures, while essential for functionality, pose risks to privacy, security, and operational integrity. Adversaries can exploit these signatures to track vehicle movements, interfere with operations, or compromise sensitive data. The proliferation of autonomous and electric vehicles amplifies the complexity of managing these signatures through continuous data exchanges and advanced sensor systems.

USSOCOM is calling upon niche solution providers, developers, technologists, cybersecurity experts to help them address these vehicular challenges: Advanced Encryption and Anonymization, Electromagnetic Signature Reduction, Real-Time Monitoring and Response, and Vehicle System Control.

Submit NLT 30 January 2026 11:59 PM ET
U.S. Citizens Only

For full details visit events.sofwerx.org/vehicle-telematics-and-sensor-technologies.

My Thoughts on ARSOF’s Move to Create an Info War (IWAR) Branch

Saturday, January 3rd, 2026

Small Wars Journal recently published an article written by Special Warfare CW4 William Bryant. It lays the ground work for an Army SOF initiative to create an IWAR branch within the Army, presumably under their control. My comments below were originally published in Vol 5, Issue 51 of Soldier Systems Digest. It has been slightly expanded by mentioning the intersection of IW and IW (explained below).

You can read CW4 Bryant’s article at smallwarsjournal.com/2025/12/16/transforming-and-modernizing.

I’m glad someone finally published something public about this. My critique of the concept casts no aspersions on CW4 Bryant’s paper. I really enjoyed it and it plugged several holes I had regarding some of the thought processes behind this effort. The article is well written and sets the stage well, yet I continue to question the inclusion of Civil Affairs in this proposal.

Reality has a vote and that vote has already been cast from my understanding. ARSOF’s appetite was allegedly much bigger than what we see here, although it is alluded to. Along the lines of the SOF-Cyber-space triad, ARSOF attempted to create something which intertwined themselves with communities who quite frankly don’t need their help.

Word is that ARSOF wanted to shoot for the moon and absorb Cyber along with FA 30 and combine it with PSYOP and CA. Apparently, Cyber was having none of it and basically went radio silent in order to wait this silliness out. Remember, Cyber and its little brother element Electromagnetic Warfare are ascendant in the Army. Purportedly, the Army leadership was unconvinced of this power grab and suggested SOF reexamine its scheme. I’ve heard that there was even some pushback on integrating both PSYOP and CA into a new IWAR branch as CA was too big of a stretch.

Despite the fairly recent move to align CA and PSYOP Bns with the numbered SF Groups, a move akin to recreating the Special Action Forces of the 60s, ARSOF has long treated PSYOP and CA as red headed step children. Both are SOF core tasks and I don’t know a Green Beret who wants to conduct either one of them but they have consistently made decisions that diminish those two mission sets. Unfortunately, they’ll continue to neck step them across the enterprise in the future no matter how well intended decisions at the GO-level are.

In the mid-aughts USASOC made the regrettable decision to cut reserve component PSYOP and CA forces away which resulted in different capabilities and training programs from their active duty counterparts which remained in SOF. The Command is still trying to recover from that decision made so that USASOC was no longer responsible for preparing its reserve component PSYOP and CA troops, which were in high demand at the time, for deployments during the GWOT.

Eventually, they were organized under 1st Information Operations Command (Land) along with active duty Cyber and FA30 IO personnel. Unfortunately, 1st IO Command was deactivated earlier this year to make way for the Theater Information Advantage Detachments. What I believe we are seeing here is an attempt to recreate the 1st IO Cmd capability but under USASOC.

No one is going to deliver cyber effects at the tactical level because of authorities combined with a laborious targeting process. I’m sure you’d hear the same argument made regarding the use of PSYOP. It’s difficult to get permission to do and even more difficult to measure effectiveness. Consequently, we will continue to see these capabilities used at the operational and strategic levels of war.

Conversely, at the tactical level, EW is where it’s at. Every commander will want it once he understands that he gets geolocations for threat emitters and non-kinetic fires aka Electronic Attack aka jamming of signals or use of kinetic fires on the emitter. That’s stuff he can use to close with and destroy the enemy. He isn’t going to let it go.

Within a decade, every time a commander says “Cyber” he’ll mean “EW” and he’ll use that term simply because that’s the branch they are in. Regardless, he’s got EW on his mind. He’ll rarely ever encounter actual cyber operations and if he has Cyber personnel in his formation, he’ll wonder why they can’t deliver something useful like EW effects.

There is no way Big Army is going to let ARSOF absorb EW, so that means Cyber isn’t going anywhere either. Likely, they’ll decouple once Congress finally directs the Department to establish a separate Cyber service. Like the creation of USSOCOM Congress will eventually weigh in and through public law force the military stop messing around and create a uniformed service.

If Functional Area 30 officers are moved under this new branch, does this mean that ARSOF will assume responsibility to fill all of those billets in J39 shops as well as other assignments? To be sure, it has its own issues, but it’s a small yet very specialized force. Read more here. Perhaps finding a home in ARSOF will allow it to gain the identity it needs.

What does ARSOF need to do? I’d say, what has been proposed here. It’s a foot in the door, but they also need to grow PSYOP and integrate SOF EW and Deception capabilities into their repertoire. Those are capabilities that will be useful at the tactical level and help them better integrate across the formation.

They should also collocate those CA and PSYOP units with the numbered Groups and actually integrate their senior NCOs and officers across the formation, including at the SF Group level and above. I still find it odd that the first non-SF or Ranger to serve as Senior Enlisted Advisor for USASOC was a crypto-linguist and not a CMF 37 or 38 NCO.

I’d like to wrap this up by point out the ARSOF desire to create a new term, “IWAR” instead of the doctrinally established “Information Warfare.” It’s interesting and unacceptable, yet understandable. ARSOF engages in Irregular Warfare which they abbreviate as IW. They don’t want any confusion amongst their ranks, but the confusion has already been happening for quite some time. I know I regularly find myself initially confused during conversations regarding IW, listening for cues as to whether others are mentioning Irregular Warfare or Information Warfare. Having practiced both, often simultaneously, it leads my mind to wander in various directions. It will for others as well; hence, “IWAR.” As I’ve mentioned in the past, one of our biggest issues within the defense establishment is terminology, partially when it comes to anything cyber or information related. Until we get this fixed, we are going to talk past one another.