Salomon Forces Genesis MID GTX

Archive for the ‘SOF’ Category

Heads Up! SBIR 26.BZ Release 4 Pre-Release from SOFWERX

Tuesday, July 7th, 2026

The USSOCOM Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program will soon be accepting submissions for these technology areas of interest:

Direct to Phase II Topics:

SOC26BZ04-DV004: Advanced Stand-off Detection of Concealed Materials (ASDCM)

SOC26BZ04-DV005: Replanning for Evasive Autonomy to Counter Threats (REACT)

Submissions Open 22 July 2026 at 12:00 PM ET (Noon)

SOFWERX will host a virtual Q&A session for the areas of interest on 09 July at 12:00 PM ET and 1:00 PM ET. RSVP to the Q&A session at events.sofwerx.org/sbir-26-bz-release-4.

Silent Professionals Set the Conditions for Red Flag Success

Saturday, July 4th, 2026

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska — In the brisk Alaskan air, on a steep hillside overlooking the vast terrain, U.S. Army Special Forces Soldiers assigned to 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) are preparing for one of the region’s most demanding combat training exercises: Red Flag-Alaska.

For decades, Red Flag-Alaska has provided aircrews with the opportunity to train against realistic threats under contested conditions, building experience and confidence before facing real-world adversaries. Yet while fighter aircraft streak across the sky above the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex, another fight begins long before the first jet takes to the air.

Inside a nondescript room on Eielson Air Force Base, Green Berets huddled around maps, terrain imagery and mission graphics covering nearly every available table and wall space. Tactical communications equipment fills the corners of the room while planners refine timelines and routes. A briefing slide advances across a wall-mounted television, detailing the next day’s mission.

The ground force commander spoke with precision, pointing to a route displayed on the screen. It was a surprising shift. Moments earlier, the team had been smiling, joking and laughing with each other. Now, they were all business, shifted into attentive and deliberate professionals. Routes, contingencies and communications plans were discussed with the matter-of-fact tone of a team who had rehearsed the process countless times before. The mission is part of Operation Close Shave, the ground component executed by the Green Berets in support of the large scale combat operations exercise scenario.

While fighter aircraft may be the most visible element of Red Flag, they are rarely the spearhead of the operation, Green Berets shaping the battlefield before they leave the runway.

Before aircraft can operate freely in contested airspace, special operations forces work deep within contested or enemy territory to identify threats, gather intelligence and create conditions that allow the joint force to maneuver. An ODA, or Operational Detachment-Alpha, the foundational unit of action for U.S. Army Special Forces, provides commanders with the information required to help clear a path for the aircraft and paratroopers that follow.

A two-hour trip south, near Delta Junction, brings the ODA to a pothole-filled side road, Denali’s peak reaching out of the horizon like someone painted it onto the sky. Alaska’s natural beauty served as a somewhat dangerous distraction while in the opposing force’s territory; the simulated country borders indicated that the team was well behind “enemy” lines.

A group of individuals on the roadside approached the lead vehicle, the driver became cautious before realizing these were allied counterparts, operators and paratroopers from the Belgian 3 PARA (Regiment). From wary to relieved, all are smiling as introductions were exchanged and the Belgians offered to show the way to the “safe house.” Safe houses act as bases of operations for Special Forces operators; while not necessarily a house in many cases, they act as both a command center, shelter, cover, and concealment from enemy forces and civilian populations, respectively.

This particular safe house, The Alaska Flour Company is a real-world business and working farm that would function as the team’s base of operations for the next week, playing into their scenario simulated cover story as seasonal farm workers in the area; an effort to blend in with the local populace. Equipped with fake IDs and cover stories, the option to fight was only ever considered as a last course of action.

The wooden structure housing the teams was not much more than a long, wide, dark, open corridor used for grain processing, the structure being colder inside than it was out. The Belgians had set up a barrel fire outside to warm their extremities from the frigid interior of the flour plant. One of them said something in Dutch as the others around the fire laughed, stoking the flames. It was a moment of relaxation and comfort before the long days ahead.

Hours later, vivid colors painted the Alaskan sky as the multinational team of special operators moved quietly along a riverbank, carrying the equipment they would need for days of reconnaissance.

The absence of darkness during the far north’s summer nights increased the risk of detection during their no-fail reconnaissance mission. Heavy animal activity in the form of large predator’s leftover meals served as constant reminders of the dangers posed by the wildlife surrounding them. With the high-risk environment in mind, the operators set up fallback positions, established communications with rear command elements and edged toward their objectives.

Using a mix of fieldcraft and technology, the teams split into two-man elements and traversed through thick woods toward the scenario’s air defense objectives.

Through the brush, a fenced-off compound emerged ahead, revealing large mockup integrated air defense systems depicting surface-to-air missile launchers, radars and other mobile air defense equipment. The mock missile launchers hidden among the trees represented exactly the type of threat Red Flag planners wanted the ODA, and their allied counterparts, to confront.

In the exercise scenario, a network of integrated air defense systems, radar sites and command-and-control nodes formed layered barriers, designated to deny access and maneuvering capability to coalition aircraft. These systems force pilots to contend with threats capable of detecting and engaging their aircraft long before they reach critical objectives.

Finding those threats is where special operations provide a critical advantage. Small teams, specializing in operating in hostile, denied and contested environments, infiltrate challenge areas to observe targets, evaluate and/or confirm intelligence and develop a comprehensive picture of the operational environment. The information they collect helps commanders distinguish between suspected targets and verified threats, reducing uncertainty before air assets are committed.

In an era increasingly defined by technological advantages such as satellites, drones and electronic sensors, it may be tempting to assume technology alone can provide every answer. However, modern battlefields remain environments of constant adaptation, where adversaries actively employ camouflage, deception, electronic warfare measures/countermeasures and other techniques designed to obscure themselves and their operations. A target detected by one sensor may prove to be a decoy when observed from the ground. Even the most advanced collection platforms can produce incomplete or conflicting information when confronted by a determined adversary. In the end, commanders often still rely on someone physically confirming at the target site and reporting accurate and timely information.

“The problem with satellite sensors is they have a harder time maintaining eyes on,” said one of the Special Forces Soldier. “If we are able to get behind enemy lines and conduct an operation like this, there’s a constant ground sensor.”

For ODAs, fieldcraft, observation and direct confirmation remain indispensable tools. The ability to physically verify with eyes on a target provide joint forces commanders a level of certainty that technology alone cannot always deliver. In a contested environment, that assurance can mean the difference between a successful air campaign and aircraft flying into unknown threats.

“We are deep behind enemy territory trying to open the air corridor and allow conventional forces to parachute in and gain control of this area,” the Soldier said. “We’re here in support of the main effort, which is the joint force entry of the 11th Airborne Division, so they can jump in, get boots on the ground and begin taking control of key terrain or infrastructure.”

The ODAs remained concealed among moss-covered logs and dense vegetation bordering the clearing, quietly observing and transmitting information while remaining mindful of OPFOR operating in the area.

“No troop transport planes, C-17s or anything like that, can gain access to this airspace to conduct an air operation until these are taken out,” the Soldier declared. For the next several days, reconnaissance and observation remained the primary mission. Operators relied on their advanced knowledge of wilderness survival skills, keeping fire going, supplementing field rations with food gathering and demonstrating basic shelter construction. Despite the constant sunlight, temperatures plunged into the low 30s overnight. Frigid hours bundled in waterproof clothing without a heat source were but a glimpse into the conditions special operations personnel endure during real-world operations.

Although they had not yet encountered OPFOR, the implications of doing so remained top of mind.

“… The risk is detection and compromise,” the Soldier explained. “A mission like this in real life is extremely dangerous.” The Soldier emphasized, in no uncertain terms, just how perilous a task this can be. It was a sobering assessment. But how do operators mitigate that risk? “That’s why we do training like this,” he continued. “To figure out where our gaps are. Figure out where we need to improve. The only way you can infiltrate this deep, in my opinion, is by blending in, maintaining a very low signature and a very low pattern of life.”

During a quiet moment of the perpetual daylight, around 3 a.m., coffee simmered in a portable carafe one operator had carried into the field. A reminder that even among highly trained professionals, caffeine remains less a luxury than a necessity.

It was much the same for the next few days — observing and reporting — though it was hardly monotonous in the beautiful Alaskan wilds, especially when broken up by the appearance of wandering wildlife in the distance.

The day of the culminating event arrived, having moved to a mountainside near Fort Greely. Another Special Forces Soldier sat at an observation post overlooking an FLS, or field landing strip. Although runway-sized, was more or less a stretch of dirt that had been flattened and cleared of the pervasive brush that blanketed the rolling terrain.

The Soldier could see the opposing forces’ vehicles moving along the strip, ant sized from the nestled vantage point amongst the thick shrubbery adorning the mountainside. Crouched still while waiting for word on a strike mission, he discussed the role of the Belgian counterparts.

“So they’re going to be at the north end of the [drop zone]. Their leadership right now is co-located with [ground force commander] out here at the MSS,” the other ODA team member said, referring to the mission support site. “But they’re going to be at the north end of the DZ and they’re going to try to take a sniper shot to take out a guy with a man-portable air defense. He’s carrying an SA14. Going to try to find him… and then that way we can bring in [combat air support] and we can facilitate close air support, and help enable the joint forcible entry by the 11th Airborne Division.”

Put simply, the mission was to remove the threat preventing joint force aircraft from entering the area of operations — a task that was certainly easier said than done. Less than an hour later, the answer arrived with the roar of an F-16 Fighting Falcon overhead as it rolled in on its targets.

With the air defense systems neutralized, the spread-out teams gathered on the sloping overlook to watch the dozens of transport aircraft — American C-130s and Belgian A400Ms — begin to drop paratroopers by the score along the FLS. The ground forces’ mission was complete. Fighter jets and transports successfully reached the objective, and as the crack of the infantry’s weapons rang out over the peaks, the hasty exfiltration back to the vehicles began.

But the TACP, or tactical air control party, had one last surprise in store for the rest of the ODA. Confirming the transport craft had cleared the airspace, they radioed yet again, this time to the F-16s still circling the area and requested a “show of force.” While discussing what grid coordinates to give, one of the ODA members grinned and pointed. The unsuspecting range control contractors had been parked in their pickup trucks nearby for quite a while, breaking the illusion of the war game with their necessary presence. Still smiling, the TACP suggested, “How about them?”

Moments later, the F-16s screamed directly overhead, buzzing by the unsuspecting 4x4s, the frames of the trucks rattling as the contractors within suddenly jolted from their seats.

Descending toward the mountain pond vehicles were parked next to, Alaska revealed one last pleasant surprise. Grazing across the small body of water, a herd of caribou had come into the open, looking up and regarding the team with vague interest.

In the distance, the roar of jet engines was still audible, and as the ground forces’ role in Red Flag came to a concluded, the forces in the air were now free to dominate the battlefield, the conditions for success already set by the operators on the ground.

By SGT Nicholas Riccio

SOFWERX – Warfighter Radio Industry Day

Friday, July 3rd, 2026

SOFWERX and USSOCOM PEO-TIS are hosting a Warfighter Radio Industry Day August 11 to 13 at SOFWERX to gain a better understanding of the current market and the technical capabilities of a Key Leader Radio (KLR), an Intra Team Radio (ITR), and a Team Networking Device (TND).

USSOCOM has a critical need for reliable and secure communications for dismounted warfighters operating in a variety of challenging environments, including those that have denied, degraded, intermittent, and low-latency communication operational areas. Key Leader Radios (KLR), Intra Team Radios (ITR), and Team Networking Devices (TND) provide a multi-platform communications strategy enabling resilient, self-healing, and autonomous solutions for voice transmission, data transmission, and networking capabilities at the team and leadership levels.

This effort is for informational and planning purposes only and does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP).

U.S. Companies Only. Submit NLT 15 July 2026 11:59 PM ET.

events.sofwerx.org/peo-tis-radio-industry-day

USSOCOM Seeks Air Loitering Munition for Use with Fixed Wing Aircraft

Thursday, July 2nd, 2026

In a Sources Sought Notice issued recently to industry, Headquarters (HQ) USSOCOM Special Operations Forces (SOF), Acquisition, Technology & Logistics (AT&L), Program Executive Office-Fixed Wing (PEO-FW) is performing market research to understand Industry capability to deliver an Air Loitering Munition (ALM) Stand-Off Precision Guided Munition (SOPGM) with an extended range and capabilities beyond the current SOPGM portfolio. This capability was briefed by PEO-FW during SOF Week as it relates to the strike portfolio.

In particular they are seeking precision munitions which can be released from SOF fixed-wing air platforms (lugged munitions, Common Launch Tube (CLT) launched munitions or other release mechanism), preferably capable of employment from CLT.

Attributes:

Munition Weight: Not-to-exceed 95 lbs

System form factor:

For CLT form factor: 5.9 inch diameter, 42 inches max overall length.

For Lugged or other release mechanism: 14 inch lug spacing, 90 inches overall length (maximum), 9 inch diameter (maximum); release from either a BRU-71 or BRU-78

Seeker Assembly: Passive system (limited Radio Frequency emissions) with integrated Automatic Target Recognition (ATR)

Warhead/payload weight: maximize kinetic warhead in conjunction with munition NTE weight

Employment Environment: Contested and non-Contested with Intra Missile Communications

Minimum TRL 6

Range: min 75NM from launch point to loitering point – launch altitudes between 5000 to 30,000 feet MSL

Loitering Time: min 40min once reaching loitering point at altitudes between 500-3000 AGL

Speed: 50 -100 kts cruise and loitering, 100kts+ minimum dash speed on attack profile

C2 Integration: System shall support government-owned FANTOM Core collaborative mission autonomy to command and control the platform flight controller via a machine-to-machine (M2M) API and/or C2 integration via BMS (Battle Management System)

Logical/electrical Interface Capability: Identify compatibly, with substantiation, of 1553/UAI (via 1760) or BMS Generic CLT compatible  

Environmental Profile: Typical operational temperatures and dynamic forces associated with SOF aircraft

Mission Profile: Pre-planned routing with altitude changes and/or direct-to loiter point

Cost target: Best value at quantity points of 500, 1000, 3000 (ROM level costing sufficient)

Interested parties must submit a white paper by Jul 27, 2026 12:00 PM EDT.

Sneak Peek – Raider Green

Tuesday, June 16th, 2026

You read that right..Raider Green. At SOF Select we got a sneak peek of two new pack variants from Mystery Ranch which are destined for MARSOC.

The 3 Day Assault Pack and Mountain Ruck feature a two-tone color way with Raider Green being paired with Coyote buckles and zippers.

Why Raider Green? Back in October, 2024, MARSOC announced it would be ditching MultiCam and reverting to a more traditional Green color scheme. This is the result.

Senior Special Ops Leaders Discuss Value of Partnerships, Alliances

Friday, May 22nd, 2026

Senior military special operations forces leaders from the U.S., Sweden and the Philippines participated in a morning panel today about the importance of SOF partnerships and alliances, as part of Special Operations Forces Week 2026 in Tampa, Florida.

During the one-hour conversation, the four participants discussed how building trust through international alliances enhances collective readiness and interoperability, making it a prerequisite for mission success in contested environments.

“I think the most important thing is to continue to build trust between partners within the alliance, [and] also between partners,” Swedish army Brig. Gen. Rickard Johansson, commander of Sweden’s special operations forces, replied after the panel was asked what the international SOF community needs to focus on most to ensure that alliances are stronger, truly integrated and capable of meeting the challenges of an increasingly complex and contested world.

“And we will continue to do that, because that is the bottom line for all activities that we are supposed to do: build trust,” Johansson added. 

Air Force Maj. Gen. Claude K. Tudor Jr., commander of U.S. Special Operations Command Africa, concurred with Johansson’s assessment, noting that his command has to monitor 53 countries on the African continent, so strong relationships with those countries’ SOF elements are vital.

“Any day that ends in a ‘y,’ you know, there could be crisis out there. And so, as we continue to go through that — in order for us to have the placement and access that we need without building huge infrastructure all over the place — it’s critical to have those relationships,” Tudor said, adding that such relationships are “very, very critical.”

The panel also discussed the need to build trust and develop strong working relationships with partners and allies to enable joint interoperability of advanced warfighting technologies.

Specifically, the leaders discussed the incorporation of abundant, attritable autonomous weapons systems — robustly designed drones that are cheap and scalable enough that commanders can tolerate losing them in combat.

Army Maj. Gen. Jasper Jeffers III, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command Central, explained that incorporating such technologies into the fight will make things happen fast and that SOF partners will need to be on the same page.

“Things are going to happen at a speed [where] human relationships are going to be the thing that gets you [into the fight], but it’s not going to let you execute and win. … And we’re going to need partnerships that include all of those trust aspects. … But then, on the outside of that, you’re going to need to be able to go to any one of these partners, and we’re going to have to be able to scale quickly,” Jeffers said of incorporating the weapons systems into SOF partnerships.

Jeffers cited relationships with Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and Israel as good examples of countries with which the U.S. SOF community is partnering to synchronize their respective warfighting technologies.

The panelists were also asked to cite examples of how establishing a deep personal trust between their SOF community and a partner nation have directly led to a strategic success that would otherwise have been impossible.

Philippine army Maj. Gen. Ferdinand B. Napuli, commander of that country’s special operations command, pointed to the strong relationship his island nation has had with the U.S. for the past 80 years.

Specifically, he cited Exercise Balikatan, a massive annual U.S.-Philippine military drill that regularly integrates special operations forces to execute complex counterterrorism, unconventional warfare and crisis-response scenarios, as an example of the partnership, an exercise that is growing in size each year.

“Thank you, world partners, for this year. The growing number of participants in Balikatan is [warmly] felt,” Napuli said.

Johansson told the partner nation members in the audience that Sweden could not have reached a high level of military competence without their help.

“The support from a lot of partners in this room, [has] actually made us be what we have become. Thank you for that,” he said.

By Matthew Olay, Pentagon News

AFSOC Unveils OA-1K Skyraider II Rapid Deployment Capability at SOF Week

Wednesday, May 20th, 2026

TAMPA, Fla. —  

During the annual Special Operations Forces Week conference, Air Force Special Operations Command unveiled a unique capability of its OA-1K Skyraider II.  

To fulfill rapid deployment requirements and further provide expeditionary agility, AFSOC’s newest platform, the Skyraider II, is capable of rapid break-down disassembly and reassembly. In this broken-down state, one or several Skyraider IIs can be loaded onto a larger aircraft and moved during strategic airlift to a new location, overcoming the tyranny of distance. Upon arrival at its destination, crews can quickly configure the aircraft to a flyable operational condition.   

“This capability is right in line with our vision of the versatility the OA-1K and its crews will provide to our teammates,” said Lt. Gen. Mike Conley, AFSOC commander. “The OA-1K offers a unique and modular solution for a wide range of operations, including armed overwatch, at a fraction of a cost of other platforms.” 

The OA-1K was designed to be adaptable across mission requirements, whether it be close air support, precision strike, or armed intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.  

“SOF teams will value the Skyraider II’s ability to operate alongside them in austere environments,” said Conley. “Whether you need an OA-1K to find, fix, target, or engage directly, it will adapt to the requirements of the mission at hand.” 

AFSOC will have an OA-1K static present at this year’s SOF Week conference. SOF Week is an annual, week-long conference that brings together the international SOF community, industry partners and leaders across U.S. Special Operations Command.  

While at SOF Week, AFSOC leaders will engage with key stakeholders that will utilize the Skyraider II in the future, while strengthening strategic partnerships across the SOF enterprise to accelerate collective modernization.  

The first missionized OA-1K was delivered to AFSOC on April 3, 2025. Since then, formal training has been anchored at Will Rogers Air National Guard Base in Oklahoma, where operators are refining the platform’s specialized capabilities, including its rapid deployment advantage.   

“The rapid disassembly and reassembly means, in a matter of hours, the aircraft can be loaded into mobility aircraft like a C-5 or C-17 for worldwide deployment,” said Lt. Col. Robert Wilson, AFSOC’s Armed Overwatch requirements branch chief. “With the OA-1K ‘any place, any time, anywhere’ is not just a motto, but an actual capability.” 

ASFOC will continue to validate this capability in upcoming operational tests and during regularly scheduled exercises. The flexibility offered to the commanders employing the OA-1K ensures they always have dedicated overwatch while operating in non-permissive environments.  

Air Force Special Operations Command

USSOCOM Seeks Hypervelocity Improved Capability Assault Rifle (HICAR)

Wednesday, May 20th, 2026

Rumors have been floating around since ISOF Range day that USSOCOM was going to issue a Request For Proposals for an M4 compatible upper receiver group capable of firing high pressure 5.56 ammunition as well as currently used M855A1 and Mk262 cartridges. This week Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane released an RFP.

The means of procurement will be Other Transactional Authority. Additional information on this process is available by referencing CSO N0016425SC0001, the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Crane Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO).

The Requirement:

USSOCOM is seeking a carbine system to act as a replacement or upgrade for the current URG-I (Upper Receiver Group – Improved). The goal is to integrate advancements in material science and weapon design to provide operators with a technically superior individual weapon system capable of firing both legacy 5.56x45mm NATO and emerging hyper velocity ammunition.

The stated goal of this effort is to extend effective endgames ranges from the current 300 meters out to 600 meters.

Additional details:

The RFP states that “Weapon submissions that address the following technology priorities will benefit during the selection process:”

Hypervelocity Ammunition Compatibility: The ability to accept and reliably cycle both 5.56NATO and hyper velocity 5.56x45mm ammunition is a primary objective. The development of a complete weapon system or conversion kit optimized for hypervelocity ammunition will be a collaborative effort between the government and the proposer. Hypervelocity rounds offer significant performance benefits, including:

Increased Effective Range: Higher muzzle velocity allows the projectile to maintain kinetic energy over longer distances, extending the effective range to 600m+.

Improved Terminal Performance: Enhanced energy transfer upon impact leads to more effective terminal ballistics.

Enhanced Barrier Penetration: The increased velocity and kinetic energy enable the projectile to more effectively defeat body armor, barriers, and other hardened surfaces.

Longevity and Durability: The system must be engineered to withstand the increased chamber pressures and bolt thrust generated by hypervelocity ammunition without compromising the weapon’s service life or operator safety.

Interoperability: The system must remain fully interoperable with USSOCOM’s existing suite of Visual Augmentation Systems and Weapon Accessories (VASWA).

Primary Attributes as Threshold and Objective:

HICAR shall be chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO. (T=O)

HICAR shall be compatible and capable of fit and functioning with the M4A1 lower receiver group without permanent modifications (T); with zero modifications (O)

HICAR shall fire and function with M855A1, Mk262 as well as Government supplied M855A1+ hypervelocity ammunition loaded to 82kpsi (T); with future hypervelocity ammunition designs optimized for projectile velocity and terminal effects on target (O).

HICAR barrel shall be between 11- 12 inches in length, measured from bare muzzle to bolt face (T=O).

HICAR shall not fire when on safe and dropped in accordance with TOP 3-2-045 (T=O).

HICAR shall employ the HUXWRX Flow 556k L In “Black Magic” suppressor (SKU: M3228) to reduce signature (T=O).[1]  (this suppressor will serve as a surrogate for HICAR testing, an optimized suppressor requirement will follow in the future)

Secondary Attributes:

Average Mean Radius of 1 MOA (T); 0.5 MOA (O) when fired unsuppressed.[2]

Measured by averaging total of three (3) groups of ten (10) shots each fired by three (3) separate weapons in unsuppressed, manned, supported configuration at 100 meters with Black Hills Mk262 Mod1-C 77gr, PN# MP460556N9-COMMammunition.

No single ten round group larger than 2.5MOA extreme spread (T=O)

Barrel muzzle threaded to 1/2×28 or 5/8×24 threads per inch (T=O).

Weight not to exceed, unloaded and without suppressor, of 8lbs (T); 6.5lbs (O).

Length not to exceed, when measured from the end of the receiver extension to the end of muzzle device, of 31 (T); 28 (O) inches.

Continuously timed and biased M1913 picatinny rail at 12 o’clock minimum of 16 inches in length. (T=O)

Interoperability with all current SOCOM POR Visual Augmentation Systems (VAS) accessories and enablers (T=O).

Recoil shock impulse less than the POR Mk17 7.62NATO to ensure VAS survivability (T=O)

HICAR ergonomics similar to M4A1 (T=O).

HICAR MRBS of 800 (T); 1,600 (O) rounds between stoppages.

HICAR MRBF of 5,000 (T); 10,000 (O) rounds between failures

Cycle and function with M855A1 and Mk262 ammunition (T) cycle and function with current training ammunition to include ball, frangible, and tracer cartridges (O).

Barrel life 8,000 (T); 20,000 (O) rounds.

Measured with M855A1+ ammunition fired as a function of Muzzle Velocity loss of 5% below mean or dispersion above an established threshold, whichever occurs first (T=O).

Trigger pull weight less than 5lbs (T), 3lbs (O)

Selection of fire: Safe, Semi-auto (T) fully Automatic (O).

Cycle and function with Gen3 PMAG Magazines (T=O)[3].

Handguard should minimize deflection and POI shift when under load from a bipod or supported on a barricade (O).

Handguard with M-LOK mounting points at 7 positions radially for mounting accessories and enablers (T=O).         

Modular ambidextrous safety lever (O). (“Modular” defined as ability to have a selector lever on left, right or both sides simultaneously)

Ambidextrous bolt catch/bolt release, ambidextrous magazine release, and ambidextrous charging handle (O).

Fencing around the controls to prevent accidental engagement of the magazine release and bolt release mechanisms (T=O).

Single rigid sling point at the rear of the receiver for maritime operations (O)[4].

Resistant to damage from immersion in three (3) feet of seawater for two (2) hours without affecting the weapon’s performance and able to fire within thirty (30) (O); ten (10) (T) seconds after submersion.

Protected with durable corrosion resistant coating in all SOF climatic environments including NBC contaminated environments. Corrosion and abrasion proof coatings to minimize the attraction of dust and contaminants (T=O).

Utilize where possible self-lubricating coatings and minimize buildup of dust, carbon, copper, and debris (O).

Fully functional in all environments from -40 to 165 degrees Fahrenheit (O).

Comply with relevant direct-fire MIL-STD specifications as directed by NSWC-Crane SOCOM Weapons Team (O).

Industry Partner submit to and successfully perform all tests required by NSWC-Crane SOCOM Weapons Team to achieve limited safety release (LSR) from the Navy Weapon Safety Evaluation & Review Board (WSESRB) (O).

Inscribed at position of Government-choosing with Industry Partner, OASW (SO/LIC) & SSO CD&I TOS Team Lethality logos. (Nice touch guys)

Contain markings to include caliber, year of manufacture, and manufacturer identification.

Not rely on any first-order-supply-chain components from adversary countries as defined in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (O). Any such reliance must be fully documented and mitigated in the Contract Risk Register by Industry Partner (T). 

If not already in BASE, Industry to provide industrialization plan to produce HICAR in the United States by the completion of the contract (T). Designed, engineered, and assembled in the United States (O).

A complete HICAR system to consist of the following:

Weapon System, Urban

Heat Mitigation Rail Covers

Buttstock, Multi-Point Adjustable

7x Magpul Gen3 556 Magazines

Field Maintenance Kit, Fix-It Sticks

Field Cleaning Kit

User Manual and Maintenance Manual, hard copy and digital.

The Ammunition

The ammunition used is going to drive this program. As currently configured, neither the M4A1 or USSOCOM’s URG-1 will reliably withstand this new cartridge’s wear and tear. If they would, there would be no reason for this procurement.

Many vendors who are interested in this effort may be disadvantaged due to access to the government provided ammunition and the shirt timelines. White papers must be submitted by 8 June and the government won’t announce those who are invited to a vendor day until 29 June and can’t pitches the specified ammunition until then. They will then have until 15 September to prepare for the Pitch Days where selected vendors will have one-on-ones with the government and must demonstrate their candidate URG on the range.

The big question has been which high pressure 5.56 cartridge they are actually planning to field. It is being referred to as M855A1+ in the RFP and we also know that USSOCOM is planning for chamber pressures in excess of 82kpsi.

The Army has been quietly working on a couple of solutions and SOF another. Even with the fielding of the Next Generation Squad Weapon M7 rifle and M8 carbine, the US Army alone will still have around 900,000 M4/M4A1 carbines in its inventory so enhanced lethality for the M4 platform is in everyone’s best interest. While the Army didn’t adopt the URG-I to improve its service rifle capability, the increased capability of a new high pressure case 5.56 would likely lead to Army interest in fielding an “M4A2” variant using the new URG and appropriate operating system upgrades. In such a scenario, the M4 lower would remain. USSOCOM’s goal is the same, improve the capability of the current M4A1.

Likewise, SOCOM has multiple ammunition improvement efforts afoot including what they are referring to as “Hyper Velocity” ammunition.

Concerns

Aside from access to the ammunition which will become a serious eye opener for those who lack experience with high pressure cartridges, I have a couple of other concerns. The government has stated they are willing to accept Technology Readiness Level 6 proposals which are still in the realm of a science experiment. Additionally, other than what is specified above, there is no proposed timeline for the procurement.

Conclusion

It certainly offers a huge capability increase for US military small arms. This will be an interesting effort to watch and even more so to see what industry proposes and how much of that will be introduced commercially.