Atrius Development Group

Archive for the ‘Guest Post’ Category

Marine Corps Systems Command Explores Cutting-Edge Boot Designs to Enhance Warfighter Lethality

Friday, July 25th, 2025

To enhance the lethality of individual Marine warfighters, 25 School of Infantry-West instructors will spend the summer testing a new design for Marine Corps Systems Command’s (MARCORSYSCOM) Optional Boot Program.

This model, which features lighter weight materials, unique drainage ports for improved breathability, and improved ergonomics to reduce leg and back injuries, follows a similar evaluation that took place earlier this year at Camp Lejeune, N.C., where Marines with 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion tested footwear that included advanced orthotic technology.

“The entire process takes about six months,” explained Todd Towles, team lead for Clothing and Equipment, Combat Service Support Equipment (CSSE). “It’s all about determining the fit, form, function, and durability; all at a reasonable price point for the Marines.”

The Optional Boot Program ensures only the highest-performing footwear makes it to the field. The process begins with a detailed visual inspection assessing color shade consistency, proper height, weight, and overall workmanship. After passing this initial review, boots undergo four months of rigorous field testing—worn daily by active-duty Marines in demanding conditions.

“Never satisfied with the status quo, the Marine Corps always looks for ways to improve the warfighter experience,” said Force Recon Company Senior Enlisted Advisor Master Sgt. Andrew Perryman, 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion. “If a product isn’t meeting the standard then it’s cut from the inventory.”

Alongside this summer’s real-world evaluation, which will determine if the boots dry faster to allow for better foot health, lab testing further validates durability, comfort, and quality, reinforcing the Corps’ commitment to providing Marines with superior equipment designed to weather the most challenging missions.

“We see the Optional Boot Program as a way to access the best technology and give Marines more options on fit, performance, and availability on the shelves,” said Maj. Joshua Foster, project officer for CSSE. “We need a diverse set of vendors to ensure we can sustain the fleet’s needs—that has been a serious challenge based on supply chain and quality issues over the last several years.”

The program office for Combat Support Systems (CSS) plays a crucial role in life cycle management for all clothing and individual equipment issued to Marines supporting global operations. From concept development through testing, procurement, fielding, and sustainment, this office ensures that every item meets the toughest standards for performance and durability in extreme environments. The Marine Corps’ rigorous evaluation protocols—often conducted in the most austere conditions—set a high mark.

“Our primary concern is equipping our Marines with quality gear, when they need it,” said Towles, a Marine veteran who has worked with MARCORSYSCOM for almost 20 years. “Anything less and we’re failing them.”

“Through joint clothing boards, we can share test data and lessons learned across DoD. We also seek to adopt equipment tested by the other services to save the Marine Corps on costs and evaluation time; especially when tasks or environments are common among service members. It is a great partnership,” remarked Foster.

This collaboration increases the buying power of the Marine Corps and Joint Force.

“With mission success often hinging on staying warm, dry, and mobile, the meticulous efforts of our team guarantees that Marines are equipped with top-tier gear that embodies the Corps’ unwavering commitment to excellence,” said Towles. “Certification is not permanent; we conduct frequent inspections with our Marine Corps Exchange partners to ensure Marine clothing and footwear continues to meet our standards.”

Illustrating that point, by continuing to push for quality and performance, the CSS team recently identified the delivery of deficient US-made footwear.

“Once we discovered the issue, the program office along with the boot vendor did an MCX-enterprise inspection and identified all stock not acceptable by Marine standards,” said Towles.

Nearly 25 percent of the boots were returned to manufacturers—ultimately preventing Marines from buying substandard gear.

“We were disappointed with them missing the mark, but pleased with their response,” said Towles. “Our vendors understand that the Marine Corps has high standards when it comes to our uniform items, even if the materials are part of an optional purchase. The vendors understand the Marine Corps has a high bar and they will be dropped from the program and removed from our shelves if they do not maintain quality.”

In a briefing last Spring, Col. Paul Gillikin, discussed several key factors impacting this product line such as competition, supply chain, and quality assurance.

“Over the last several years, the Marine Corps and Department of Defense has been challenged in uniforms, uniform accessories, personal protective gear, and footwear,” said Gillikin, program manager for CSS. “Starting with COVID production and supply chain issues, many of our domestic industry partners could not keep up with demand due to staffing shortfalls, access to materials, or quality.”

Gillikin, who has served as the program manager for CSS for two years, explained there have been several instances of acute and long-term issues with uniform items while his team sought new, innovative technologies to improve the performance of Marines while lowering costs.

“We have a great relationship and a lot of successes with our vendors, however, corrective actions and quality assurance problems with some have been a burden that distracts us from seeking better equipment,” he said. “The optional certification program allows us to reach both U.S. and [Trade Agreement Act] manufacturers with a low barrier to entry for vendors and low-cost testing for the Marine Corps. In the long term, an increased number of vendors leads to lower prices and greater innovation. We as a [Department of Defense] enterprise have to be sensitive to that and stimulate a diverse array of manufacturers to include domestic and TAA compliant sources. The bottom line is that the Optional Boot Program incentivizes competition and challenges vendors to actively manage their supply chains and produce the best technology at a lower cost for Marines.”

Currently, most optional boots that are approved to wear, and available for purchase, fall between $189 to $399 retail.

“When I talk with Marines around the fleet, they bring up affordability, access, and quality of materials,” said Gillikin. “It’s an important factor to Marines, and some are struggling financially. Cost is already a central metric for me, but it takes on a whole different level when you talk with younger Marines that are trying to support a family.”

To this end, CSS recently screened additional domestic and Trade Agreement Act (TAA) compliant materials.

“Competition is driving innovation,” said Gillikin. “Marines are excited to test and use the equipment! Our team does supply chain surveillance to ensure quality and supplies come from compliant countries. We are in constant communication with industry, other joint force program offices, Marine Corps stakeholders, the Defense Logistics Agency, and our partners on Capitol Hill to ensure our needs are met.”

Gillikin also said their communication efforts include potential future needs of the Marines Corps as well.

“We expect the next war to be a heavily contested environment where stockpiling and additional sources of supply will be vital,” he said. “For risk reduction, my team has war-gamed multiple scenarios for building prepositioning stockpiles using domestic and TAA manufacturers along with direct shipping TAA compliant gear straight into theater during conflict into areas such as the First Island Chain and High North. We need to keep all options on the table – competition directly supports operational effectiveness and readiness.”

For more information about the Marine Corps Systems Command’s Optional Boot Program and its certification process, visit www.marcorsyscom.marines.mil.

Story by Clinton Firstbrook 

Marine Corps Systems Command

FirstSpear Friday Focus: E+R Waist Bag

Friday, July 25th, 2025

The FirstSpear E+R WAIST BAG is a lightweight, highly functional pack built for versatility and rugged performance. Designed using advanced materials and construction techniques, it delivers maximum capability while keeping weight to a minimum.

It features a 2-point quick-detach (QD) buckle system that allows it to be worn independently or secured directly to an Assaulter’s Gun Belt or plate carrier. A low-profile G Hook offers another secure attachment option, ensuring a stable fit during movement. The pack includes four zippered pockets, making it easy to organize and access essential gear.

A shock cord on top provides a quick-access stash point for items like a tourniquet or eye protection. The waist pack also includes drainage to prevent water buildup and a removable top flap stiffener for added structure when needed. Designed to accommodate waist sizes up to 44″, the E+R Waist Pack blends modern materials with combat-proven functionality.

Whether worn solo or integrated into a larger loadout, it delivers streamlined efficiency without sacrificing durability. This is a go-to option for those who need fast access to gear in demanding environments.FirstSpear is the premier source for cutting edge-tactical gear for military, law enforcement and those who train. For more information visit First-Spear.com.

DEVCOM Soldier Center Transitions New Individual Field Ration for DoD-Wide Availability

Friday, July 25th, 2025

NATICK, Mass. – A new, lightweight, energy packed, nutrient-dense, individual field ration, called the Close Combat Assault Ration, CCAR, is now available to all U.S. military service branches for procurement through the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

Under development by the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center’s Department of Defense Combat Feeding Division, CFD, since 2019, the CCAR utilizes emerging food processing technologies to significantly reduce weight and volume, while retaining vital nutrients.

Early development of the CCAR was supported by the Close Combat Lethality Task Force, which resulted in an accelerated fielding schedule. The goal was to develop a ration to support small units during operations in austere environments where they need to be self-sustained for 7-10 days with limited or no re-supply. The existing individual rations at the time, including the Meal, Ready to Eat and the First Strike Ration, were too large and bulky to meet this operational requirement.

To approach this challenge, the entire division worked together to address the multiple requirements needed to develop a tailored solution. Factors considered included: meeting nutrition needs, supporting performance, warfighter acceptability, processing and packaging to ensure shelf-stability and nutrient retention, and other unique operational challenges.

The first step was to identify and define user requirements. It was initially thought that weight and volume reductions could be gained by simply putting together nutrient-dense bars. However, after utilizing the Product Attribute Elicitation Method, or PEM, a highly scientific process for gathering user requirements, researchers discovered this was not the case.

The PEM sessions asked warfighters for descriptive feedback for a given scenario. This process obtained opinions, scoring, and quantitative data that allowed for statistical analysis. PEM includes ratings that can be scored along with qualitative data that allows for a deeper understanding of user needs.

In 2019, CFD, supported by Tufts University Sensory Science Center, executed PEM sessions with the 10th Special Forces Group at Fort Carson, Colorado; the 10th Mountain Division in Fort Drum, New York; and with the 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion, 2nd Marine Division at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Collecting these user-generated requirements early in the process proved instrumental to the successful development of this new ration.

CFD, in collaboration with industry and other government agencies, then created prototypes for the initial operation test and evaluation, or OT&E, held in 2020. The prototypes included test items developed with both novel and traditional processing methods. Several vacuum microwave dried items were tested along with sonically agglomerated items, which use sound waves to compress the food. Both technologies were found to successfully increase the nutrient and energy density of the food items.

Vacuum microwave drying uniformly removes water with both vacuum and microwave techniques, resulting in smaller compressed items that remain moist. With funding support from the Army, CFD initiated a manufacturing technology effort, which supports the maturation of VMD technology with ration manufacturers and suppliers. SA uses vibration, which combined with compression, instantly welds food molecules together without filler or binders, reducing the item sizes by 30-50 percent while retaining the same ingredients and nutrition.

These and other novel technologies were evaluated during the CCAR’s development and CFD will continue to work with industry partners to identify new technologies and evolve existing ones.

Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic created a delay in the scheduled 2020 IOT&E with warfighters. In 2021, CFD executed an IOT&E with the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Polk, Louisiana and the 2nd Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion at Fort Pickett, Virginia. The evaluation tested Warfighter consumption of CCAR prototype field rations for five days with no resupply. There were four prototype menus consisting of novel technology, commercial items and existing MRE menu components.

While the weight and volume reductions drove the need for the new ration platform, user acceptability and nutrition are also critical factors.

“We have a long standing saying in the food world that it’s not nutrition if it’s not eaten,” said Erin Gaffney-Stomberg, PhD, the Combat Feeding Division chief. “It’s critical that optimal nutrition is supplied to warfighters when and where they need it, and in a form that looks, smells and tastes good and is safe. In addition, we need to have science demonstrating how these rations impact warfighter performance. To understand this, we reached out to our partners at the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine’s Military Nutrition Division.”

According to James McClung, PhD, Military Nutrition Division chief, “negative energy balance, or the inability to consume enough calories to meet metabolic demands, is a threat to warfighter performance.”

Results from the recent studies indicate that Soldiers eating the CCAR consumed more calories and experienced smaller energy deficits compared to those consuming the FSR in an operationally relevant field training. This advantage is attributed to the CCAR’s increased energy density, which may lead to higher caloric intake, while reducing the weight and volume of the ration.

“Importantly, studies demonstrated that the CCAR did not adversely affect physical performance”, said McClung. “As the Army and DOD continue to seek ways to optimize warfighter performance and lethality, evidence indicates that the CCAR is a promising option for short-term missions where it is crucial to minimize the logistical burden while maximizing energy intake and maintaining Warfighter performance.”

The CCAR IOT&E results and recommendations were provided to the Joint Services Operational Ration Forum (Milestone C Decision Authority for Operational Rations) in early 2022. The recommendations were approved and CFD transitioned procurement documents to DLA-Troop Support for the 1st Generation CCAR in the fall of 2023.

The very first production of the CCAR occurred in May 2025 and the ration is now available for units to order through DLA-Troop Support. There are three menus that include 20 new components which leverage the MRE industrial base. Each pallet contains 48 cases with 10 menus per case (480 total meals).

The 1st Generation CCAR has decreased individual warfighter combat load, allowing space for more ammunition, water, and medical supplies.

According to Gaffney-Stomberg, “this ration will replace the FSR and the 39% reduction in volume and 17% reduction in weight as compared to the FSR translates to warfighters being able to now carry five days’ worth of nutrition in a 3-day footprint.”

“This is a significant improvement in capability for contested operational environments,” she said.

The CCAR will sustain semi-independent small units for five days without resupply and can be consumed for up to ten days as the sole source of nutrition per joint regulation. CFD will continue researching novel processing and ingredients, and work with industry to expand menu varieties and reduce weight and size of the ration.

By DEVCOM Soldier Center Public Affairs

Editor’s Note: There are currently only three menu choices which appear to be Spaghetti with Meat and Sauce, Beef Stew, and Chicken Burrito Bowl.

Arctic Technical Gear – MODSAW Zip Pouch

Thursday, July 24th, 2025

Introducing the MODSAW Zip Pouch or Modular SAW Zip Pouch, it is a large multi purpose pouch with a huge range of uses. Modularity is the key, from SAW 200rnd boxes to double 1L Nalgene’s or a two quart soft canteen. Add a divider to put an IFAK on one side and 4 smoke grenades or NVGs on the other. Add dual flaps allow you to keep one side of the divider secure while accessing one.

Features:

Fits a 200rnd M249/C9 box, a 2 qt soft canteen or two 1L Nalgene bottles

4 or 3 columns of Molle/PALS mountable

Velcro loop lined allows dividers, organizers and flaps

Multiple interchangeable flaps

Optional removable velcro internal divider

Dual Molle/PALS columns on sides

Optional compression shockcord and cord lock

Holes at top for shock cord retention tabs for tall items such as radios or bottles(sold separately)

Internal tie down slots and TQ mounting/drainage holes

MOD Belt compatible mounting via bolts or side mounted QASM buckles

Available in MC, RG, CB and Black

3.5″D x 7.5″W x 8″H

Extremely durable, made entirely of Brookwood’s Squadron laminate

All components are Berry compliant including Squadron laminate, Velcro and ITW buckles. Assembled in Canada.

www.arctictechnicalgear.com/product/modsaw-zip

US Army Leaders Discuss Vision for Future Armor Warfare at LANDEURO Conference

Thursday, July 24th, 2025

WIESBADN, Germany – At the inaugural LANDEURO conference, U.S. Army leaders from the 1st Armored Division and 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division laid out a path for transforming America’s armored forces in an era defined by pervasive surveillance, lethal drones and rapidly evolving precision strike capabilities.

On July 17, during a Warrior Corner panel titled “Reforging the Armored Spearhead: TiC 2.0 and the Evolution of Large-Scale Combat Operations”, Maj. Gen. Curtis Taylor and Command Sgt. Maj. James Light, command team of the 1st AD, and Col. Bryan Bonnema, commander of the 1st ABCT, 3rd ID, delivered an assessment of the changing battlefield and how U.S. armored formations must evolve to win future wars.

Taylor opened the panel by citing a watershed moment: a Ukrainian brigade’s fully robotic assault north of Kharkiv.

“That battle indicates the time to reimagine armor has begun and we have got to think about what armor will look like in the future,” he said.

According to Taylor, the war in Ukraine is proving that increased precision strike capabilities, lethality being cheaper than protection—especially from First-Person View drones—and the pervasiveness of surveillance are reshaping combat. Over 70% of vehicle losses in Ukraine have come from FPV drone strikes.

These trends mean our future fights won’t be defined by direct fire alone, but by platforms that can sense, survive, and strike first in a contested electromagnetic spectrum.

Four Core Imperatives for the Future ABCT

From these battlefield lessons, Taylor laid out four key takeaways required to shape the Army’s evolving concept for the ABCT:

1. Sense and Strike Integration at All Echelons. From platoon to brigade, formations must have persistent sensing and strike capabilities, from short-range FPVs to long-range ISR.

2. Layered Drone Countermeasures. Units must organically embed counter-UAS capabilities, transforming into something akin to carrier strike groups with their own protective systems.

3. Embedded EW Capabilities. Formations need robust EW teams capable of operating independently, targeting enemy systems, and navigating the electromagnetic spectrum effectively.

4. Robotic Breaching. Future assaults on entrenched defenses will depend on unmanned breaching systems, inspired by the challenges seen in Ukraine’s assaults on Russian defensive lines.

Despite advances in robotics and automation, Taylor underscored a core truth, even in high-tech battles, humans are still required to hold ground. Soldiers are not attritable assets, and the Army must invest in protecting and sustaining troops in these new operational environments.

Before passing the discussion to Light, he shared a comment from an Estonian battalion commander he thought was profound, “He said the winning side in the next war will be the army that first perfects the use of drones in maneuver warfare.”

NCO Perspective: Innovation Starts at Ground Level

Light echoed that message, emphasizing that the current generation of armored Soldiers is highly capable—but must evolve.

“Our infantry squads and armored formations are very well trained and they are very good at what they do,” Light said. “The problem is we’ve been doing it pretty much the same way for the last decade or so.”

The key to transformation, he argued, is empowering Soldiers and noncommissioned officers to innovate within their current means. He called it innovation by requirement in a resource-conscious environment.

“They absolutely are the ones that are going to be able to contribute the most and influence those outcomes that determine where we go in the future as a force,” he said.

He also emphasized training discipline, citing the U.S. tank crew that won the Strong Europe Tank Challenge by focusing on fundamentals and standard gunnery—a reflection of how strong basics still dominate the battlefield.

TiC 2.0: Experimentation at Scale

Bonnema, whose brigade recently completed the first Transforming in Contact 2.0 rotation at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center, Hohenfels, Germany, provided a detailed look at how his brigade is integrating technology, Soldier ingenuity, and new tactics to meet modern threats.

“As a TiC 2.0 ABCT, there were three things that we thought that we needed to be able to do better than a non-TiC ABCT,” he stressed. “The first was accomplish our mission, task and purpose more effectively, more efficiently. The second was to maintain more and constant pressure on the enemy through multiple forms of contact and all domains. And the last was to become more lethal. So, increase that kill ratio as opposed to non-TIC ABCT.”

Some key initiatives from the ABCT’s rotation at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center:

1. Command and Control Redesign. The brigade leveraged basic camouflage and security, virtual collaboration, and emerging communications technology to enhance decision-making while avoiding detection.

2. Maneuvering in Electromagnetic Warfare Spectrum. Small EW teams were deployed forward to locate, sense, and target to disrupt enemy formations and shape conditions for the next close fight.

3. New Task Organization. The formation task organized for purpose, creating FAAT teams—combining FPV drone pilots, artillery forward observers, and anti-tank personnel—employing them in restrictive terrain to deadly effect.

4. Comprehensive Counter-UAS Defense. Throughout the exercise leaders emphasized the need for persistent UAS defense from breach point to support area, enabling safe maneuver for both sensors and troops.

“JMRC is an opportune place for us to operate, train and experiment,” Bonnema said. “It really helped us get after readiness. From the complex terrain to the professional OPFOR, it gave us some good lessons.”

Challenges Ahead: Battery Life, Training, and Launch Concepts

Despite progress, Bonnema and Taylor acknowledged hurdles. Battery limitations, inconsistent environmental performance, and the dangerous logistics of hand-launched FPVs remain issues.

A critical future requirement, Taylor said, is deploying drones from under armor.

“We’ve got to move beyond launching drones from tough boxes in dangerous forward areas,” he noted, calling on industry to help deliver solutions like vehicle-integrated launch systems.

With no formal FPV operator military occupational specialty, U.S. Army units are adapting UAS (15-series) operators and cavalry scouts for these roles. Simulators are being used for early training, and Soldiers are logging hundreds of flight hours to reach proficiency.

Light called FPV drone piloting extremely difficult, noting that mastery takes time and dedicated talent.

“You don’t just wake up, grab your controller, and go fly up and take out a tank,” he said.

Bonnema also emphasized the training proficiency required for FPV operators, “We’re using simulations to get after training, conducting hundreds of simulated missions before we get into live. And then once we get into the live training progression in our tables, it’s hundreds. Six hundred and sixty [hours] is what we’ve flown so far in preparation for our live fire.”

Europe: A Catalyst for Innovation

Taylor closed by highlighting how being deployed to Europe, so close to conflict, has supercharged innovation for the division.

“You have an opportunity because of your proximity to the theater, because the energy that is here in the NATO Alliance to innovate at a pace that I never thought was possible,” he said.

The division will return home, he said, better trained and more prepared to adapt to the changing character of war.

As the U.S. Army confronts a future battlefield dominated by drones, sensors, and electronic warfare, the 1st Armored Division and 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division are leading the charge to modernize America’s armored spearhead. Their message is clear: the time to adapt is now—and the Soldier remains central to victory.

The 1st Armored Division and 1 Armored Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division are forward-deployed to the European theater, working alongside NATO allies and regional security partners to provide combat-credible forces to V Corps, America’s forward deployed corps in Europe.

By Lt. Col. Jessica Rovero

RIA-JMTC Gears Up for the Future Under New Leadership

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2025

Rock Island Arsenal, Ill. – This week marked a significant changing of the guard at Rock Island Arsenal-Joint Manufacturing and Technology Center as Col. David Guida passed the command torch to Col. Eloy Martinez in a ceremony steeped in tradition and gratitude.

“I stand before you today with a deep sense of responsibility and a clear vision: to build upon the incredible legacy of RIA-JMTC, solidifying our position as the Army’s premier organic industrial base provider of readiness solutions for our nation’s Warfighters,” Martinez said. “This facility is a cornerstone of national defense, and a vital component of The Army’s global reach. To the dedicated men and women of RIA-JMTC — this facility is a national asset.”

Martinez, a leader with more than three decades of dedicated service encompassing aviation, transportation, special operations and strategic logistics, expressed profound humility and eagerness to lead the vital manufacturing hub. He acknowledged the weight of responsibility, but also the immense potential within the ranks of RIA-JMTC. Before outlining his strategic vision, he paused a moment to recognize the steadfast support system that has been instrumental in shaping his journey and career success.

“I’d like to express my deepest gratitude to God for His many blessings. Without Him, none of this would be possible,” Martinez said. “To my wife, Jennifer, thank you for thirty-two years of unwavering love and support. You are my foundation, and I love you dearly.”

After offering personal acknowledgements, Martinez turned his attention to the core of his new mission: leading the exceptional team at RIA-JMTC. He underscored the factory’s critical role and strategic importance in national defense.

“Over the past six months, I’ve had the privilege of meeting many of you, touring the facilities, and witnessing firsthand the incredible capabilities housed within these walls,” Martinez said. “I’ve seen your dedication, your ingenuity, and your unwavering commitment to excellence. These accomplishments are a testament to your hard work and your profound dedication to providing our Warfighters with the tools they need to succeed.”

Martinez demonstrated a keen understanding of RIA-JMTC’s expansive capabilities, highlighting the impressive ability to simultaneously manage more than 300 diverse projects, ranging from legacy system sustainment to cutting-edge technology development. He specifically acknowledged the recent achievement of AS9100 certification, a testament to the facility’s commitment to quality and continuous improvement within the aerospace industry.

“My commitment to you is simple. We will build upon this incredible foundation, embracing data-driven decision making, predictive maintenance and a relentless pursuit of efficiency,” Martinez stated. “Together, we will: streamline processes leveraging Lean Six Sigma principles, aggressively embrace advanced technologies like additive manufacturing and robotics, strengthen partnerships across the Department of Defense and with our industry partners, and fully leverage our full spectrum of capabilities, from initial design and prototyping to full-rate production and lifecycle support.”

He then laid out his vision for the future of RIA-JMTC, built on a foundation of continuous improvement and adaptation.

“We will anticipate challenges, pioneer solutions and maintain the highest standards of excellence to keep RIA-JMTC a cornerstone of military readiness.” Martinez said. “From alloying and casting, to forging and advanced manufacturing, all the way to final delivery, your work ensures Warfighters receive the equipment they need, when they need it.”

He pledged to anticipate challenges, pioneer solutions and maintain the highest standards of excellence.

“It’s an honor to join this team. I look forward to leading, learning and working alongside each of you,” Martinez said. “Let’s seize this opportunity. Together, we’ll shape the future of American manufacturing and continue strengthening our nation’s defense. Let’s get to work.”

By Kendall Swank

Australian and Japanese Soldiers Showcase Their Capabilities

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2025

One of the most crucial aspects of multi-national interoperability is a common understanding of the weapons, equipment and techniques of partner nations.

While the headquarters elements of the Amphibious Task Group 1 (ATG1) coordinated the upcoming activities during the transit from Cowley Beach to Bowen, the embarked Australian Army and the Japan Ground Self-Defense Forces (JGSDF) came together on the light vehicle deck of HMAS Canberra to showcase their different capabilities. 

Soldiers, marines and officers shared weapons, techniques, capability and a few laughs, that culminated in a leopard-crawl race across the deck. 

Providing insight into what an Australian standard infantry battalion (SIB) carries, Alpha Company, 1st Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment (1RAR) were eager to showcase their weapon systems to their international counterparts. 

JGSDF soldiers inspected the Australian Minimi Light Support Weapon, General Support Machine Gun MAG 58, MDFSW 84, M72A6 LDFSW 66, and the EF88 Austeyr with SL40s attachment.

1RAR’s Direct Fire Support Weapons platoon introduced their heavy-weapons capability, which included the anti-armour Carl Gustav 84-millimetre recoilless rifle, the GSMG Mag-58 and HMG 12.7-millimetre machine guns (also known as a 50-Calibre) capable of firing armour-piercing rounds. 

Private Harrison Swan, 1RAR, observed that the Japanese also operated the 84-millimetre Carl Gustav.  

“I think it’s interesting to see that we are using the same weapon systems, there’s a lot of similarities but a lot we can learn from each other,” he said. 

1RAR’s mortar platoon explained the ranging controls of their weapons systems, complementing the battalion’s display of combat first aid kits, sniper rifles and other specialised gear. 

‘I think it’s interesting to see that we are using the same weapon systems, there’s a lot of similarities but a lot we can learn from each other.’ 

Sappers from the embarked elements from 3rd Combat Engineer Regiment demonstrated their specialist breaching equipment, demolitions and high-risk search equipment. 

These included a wide array of equipment that allows the combat engineers to support manoeuvre elements through the battle space. 

Despite all the hardware, the unchallenged fan-favourite of the day was Charlie the Explosives Detection Dog, who enjoyed pats and games of tug-of-war with multinational members on the deck. 

Overall, the morning was great success, since professional mastery and camaraderie both help to breach language barrier, as these highly capable units prepare for the upcoming amphibious raid in the Shoalwater Bay Training Area in the coming days.

Via Australian Army

DEVCOM Armaments Center Engineers Seek to Increase Soldier Safety by Reducing Blast Overpressure

Monday, July 21st, 2025

PICATINNY ARSENAL, N.J. – The harm to Soldiers from frequent exposure to weapons that cause blast overpressure (BOP) when fired has gained increasing attention, prompting Congress to pass a broad set of directives related to blast exposure and brain health.

Congressional mandates to the Pentagon include setting new safety limits for troops’ blast exposure, characterizing “Tier 1” weapon systems including the suite of ammunition for BOP and brain health impact and developing material solutions if required for current and future weapon systems.

According to the Army’s Medical Command, organs most susceptible to BOP include the middle ear, lung, brain, and bowel. The command notes that many of the long-term effects are still not well understood.

The DEVCOM Armaments Center is one of the main players in the collective effort to mitigate BOP because its engineers are involved in the design, development, fielding, and sustainment of many systems that have been identified as contributing to BOP: howitzers, mortars, shoulder mounted weapons, 50 caliber weapons, along with demolitions and breaching charges.

The first “Picatinny Weapons Community Blast Overpressure Summit” was held on October 22-23, 2024. In addition to the Armaments Center, other attendees included the Joint Program Executive Office Armaments and Ammunition; Program Executive Office Soldier; the Army Research Lab, the Medical Research and Development Command, and the Defense Health Agency Public Health Aberdeen.

“That was a great opportunity for the weapons community to come together,” said Jeffrey Kraft, who is the Armaments Center POC for the BOP initiative. “It was a way to basically level-set on what’s happening across the weapons community with respect to blast overpressure and also an opportunity to communicate what we’ve been learning at the larger forums that are happening at the Office of the Secretary of Defense level.”

Kraft said it was critical to develop close relationships with all the other stakeholders involved in mitigating BOP.

“From the weapons community side, we’re not doing this in a vacuum,” he said. “We’re working closely with the medical community to make sure that as they’re learning more about blast overpressure and what that means to the Soldier, we can apply that knowledge and incorporate that into our strategies as we try to solve it from the weapons community side. Building those relationships is key to making sure that we address this as a whole-of-Army, whole-of-DOD approach.”

At the Armaments Center, lines of effort (LOE) to address the BOP issue include baselining legacy and new munition and weapon systems, engineering solutions development for reduced BOP, data acquisition and analysis and blast sensors; modeling and simulation development; and improved ‘shoot house’ designs and ranges to reduce BOP. Another LOE is munition and weapon supportability, which includes personnel training, training packages, support equipment and human factors

“The technical challenges are how do we continue to maintain the weapon systems’ lethality and performance while also reducing and mitigating blast overpressure,” Kraft said. “For each weapon system, the technical challenges are going to be a little bit different depending on the attributes of the system.”

Kraft said a big first step in BOP mitigation is to gather enough data to get a clearer picture of the size and nature of the problem. “Once we understand what the problem is, then we can start to develop solutions. And we don’t know what we don’t know. As we start to get into this, we may learn where those limits are based on physics that we can only go so far. But right now, the goal is let’s try to get moving on this sooner than later to see where that point is.

“I think the other challenge right now is truly understanding what blast does to the Soldier’s health and developing a set of requirements that can be used for developing and implementing new engineering solutions.”

One solution that has received attention in the media is a new breaching charge form. The new charge form was developed at the Armaments Center by Mr. Greg Stunzenas and team, and can be used with legacy explosives to reduce/mitigate blast overpressure, such as when Soldiers breach doors or other barriers.

Also, an attenuating blast cone developed at the Armaments Center by Dr. Robert Carson and team can be used with a mortar system such as the 120 mm mortar. The cone redirects the blast wave so that the exposure level to the Soldiers is much lower.

Over the past years, blast overpressure from howitzers has been reduced through optimization of the muzzle brake design through numerical methods (computational fluid dynamics) and testing validation. Now, a team at the Armaments Center is also exploring the possibility of removing the muzzle brake from the howitzers and make adjustments to the recoil systems as a way to mitigate overpressure.

“There’s a big push right now within the blast overpressure community to understand how wearable sensors can be used to monitor what the exposure levels are to our Soldiers,” Kraft said. “Here at the Armaments Center, we have some technologies that we’re developing and adopting from large-caliber ammunition systems and applying that technology to blast sensors. The goal is to incorporate the blast sensors into the Soldier’s helmets to understand what their exposure profiles and limits will be from a blast event.”

Another initiative is to create workshops focused on individual weapons systems. Participants are digging deeper into what data is available for the systems, what new ideas might be brainstormed, and what might be done to either eliminate or mitigate blast overpressure.

“In the workshops, we can get the weapons community members together to really target a specific weapon system and figure out, how do we get after this?”

The BOP initiative is a key example of how the Armaments Center workforce is challenged to “Find a Way” through creative solutions while also collaborating closely with our partners.

By Edward Lopez and Timothy Rider