FirstSpear TV

Archive for the ‘USMC’ Category

MCB Quantico Live Fire of Scorpion Light Mobile Mortar System

Friday, August 29th, 2025

Last week, Global Military Products and Polaris Government and Defense were invited to participate in a live-fire demonstration on Marine Corps Base Quantico in conjunction with the Marine Gunners Symposium.

On one of Quantico’s 43 live ranges, a group of Marine gunners witnessed the Scorpion Light mobile mortar system in action, demonstrating the shoot and scoot capabilities of the system. Mounted on the Polaris MRZR Alpha 6×6, the fully integrated platform provides mobility, lethality, operator safety and air transportability. The rapid-fire control system is designed to elevate operational efficiency, while the expanded payload of the MRZR Alpha 6×6 variant allows for 48 mortars to also be transported.

More on the Scorpion Light

The Scorpion Light – known internationally as the Alakran – mobile mortar system has been combat proven across countries in Europe and the Middle East, showing its reliability and effectiveness in diverse and hostile environments. Built with durable materials and rugged construction to withstand extreme temperatures, dust, and harsh conditions, its robust design and resilient technologies make it a durable weapon that can withstand the rigors of combat and remain effective. The mobile mortar system can fire 8 rounds and relocate in under 2 minutes. The dual system can integrate 120mm and 81mm smoothbore or rifled mortars in a very simple operation, providing high firepower and making it a powerful tool for neutralizing enemy targets.

More on the MRZR Alpha 6×6

The MRZR Alpha 6×6 is a two-seat platform with a 65 percent larger cargo bed optimized for heavier systems and payloads, like the Scorpion Light. The vehicle has 3,600 lbs (about 1632.93 kg) of payload available, with 3,000 lbs (about 1360.78 kg) of that available in the extended cargo bed. The third axle and short wheelbase also have a positive impact on mobility, decreasing the contact pressure per tire for enhanced performance in soft soil, mud and bogs. The MRZR Alpha 6×6 maintains top speed and air transportability and has more than 90% parts commonality with the base MRZR Alpha. Expeditionary warfighters operating worldwide in austere environments require modular platforms that can adjust to multiple environments and modes of transport – tactical air, fixed wing plane and ship – now more than ever.

Galvion Wins US Marine Corps Integrated Helmet System contract

Tuesday, August 12th, 2025

Galvion, a world leader in the design and manufacture of innovative head systems, power and data management solutions, and integrated soldier systems, has been awarded the United States Marine Corps (USMC) Integrated Helmet System (IHS) contract. The five-year indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract from the Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) has a maximum value of $131,396,296. Galvion’s customized Integrated Helmet System was developed over multiple years under the scope of an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) with Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) to meet the unique operational requirements of the U.S. Marine Corps.

The Galvion IHS Solution is a functionally robust, USMC-mission-focused system that is optimized to meet all USMC technical requirements. The no-through hole, hi-cut helmet is a proprietary geometry (introduced commercially as the Hellbender™ platform earlier this year) that combines an ECH front shape for ease-of-integration with existing accessories and a ridged-back design that provides structural stability. It features the latest version of Galvion’s best-in-class Apex™ lining system, which includes improvements incorporated as a direct result of Marine feedback, resulting in a better-fitting, balanced and more stable helmet platform for SBNVG and ECOTI mounting.

Galvion’s E.D.G™ power management system integrates easily, offering scalable operational capability for Marines. The helmet was designed to support single-size components (NVG shroud, rails, harness, accessory straps) for ease of maintenance and supply logistics, with a clear upgrade and support path through its service life.

Galvion designed, built and tested prototypes demonstrating technical capabilities and integration with current USMC equipment including communication devices and visual augmentation systems, and delivered over 1000 systems across two configurations to meet the Marine Corps trial and evaluation requirements:

  • ‘Block 0’ Baseline System: helmet featuring NVD shroud with stabilization bumpers, IHS rails with NVG clips and O2 attachments, NVG bungees, External Loop Pattern, Battery Retention Straps, the latest APEX™ liner system, and a customized helmet cover with cable management.
  • ‘Block 1’ Integrated System: built off Block 0, with the addition of the E.D.G scalable power pack, single and dual cables to power SBNVG & SBNVG with ECOTI, Integrated Strobe, Task Light and optional HED.

Todd Stirtzinger, CEO at Galvion said: “This is an incredibly proud moment for the entire Galvion team. This program has been a uniting force across our organization and has driven us to innovate, integrate and collaborate faster and better as a team. From the research and development done in our Warfighter Lab to design a more stable system, to the helmets produced in our Vermont facility, to the E.D.G power and data component coming out of our New Hampshire headquarters – this has been a true team effort.” He added: “The United States Marine Corps are some of the world’s most demanding users, and our solution offers them a fully integrated helmet system that has been designed specifically to evolve with technology to support the Marines advanced mission needs. The development process for this system highlights the Marine Corps Systems Command’s commitment to working with industry to find the absolute best solution for Marines. We had such a high level of engagement with users throughout this process – through the multiple Limited User Evaluations and Ballistic Testing events organized by the MCSC and the dozen additional Galvion internal sessions that they supported. We incorporated feedback after every evaluation stage to ultimately deliver a system that has been designed by Marines, for Marines. We look forward to continuing this collaborative process as we outfit Marines with our helmets and support their evolving needs for years to come.”

USMC Selects Galvion for Integrated Helmet System

Friday, August 8th, 2025

This was just announced by the Department of Defense. More details soon.

Galvion Technologies LLC, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, was awarded a $131,396,295 firm-fixed-price indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for the Integrated Helmet System. This contract provides for the procurement of Integrated Helmet System with associated components and accessories. The ordering period will be a maximum of five years and is expected to be completed in August 2030. Work will be performed in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. No funds will be obligated at time of award. Funds will be obligated on individual task/delivery orders as they are issued. The requirement was procured under the authority of 10 U.S. Code 4022(f) as a follow-on agreement to the prototype agreement (M67854-20-9-1001). Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Virginia, is the contracting activity (M67854-25-D-5300).

KONGSBERG Awarded Full Rate Production Contract for ACV-30 Turrets

Wednesday, August 6th, 2025

KONGSBERG, NORWAY & JOHNSTOWN, PENN.– Aug. 5, 2025 – The United States Marine Corps has awarded a full-rate production contract to Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (‘KONGSBERG’) valued at up to $330 million for the 30mm remote turret for the Amphibious Combat Vehicle 30mm program (ACV-30).

The first order on the contract from PEO Land Systems Program Manager Advanced Amphibious Assault (PM AAA) includes a substantial number of turrets to be manufactured at Kongsberg’s remote weapon system facility in Johnstown, Penn. A recent expansion at the facility has resulted in more jobs and a dedicated medium caliber turret production line.

“Kongsberg is honoured to support the U.S. Marine Corps by equipping them with increased firepower and capacity,” said Eirik Lie, President of Kongsberg Defence and Aerospace. “The ACV-30 offers superior performance compared to current comparable systems, and we see the market potential for our medium caliber turrets as positive, both in the US and internationally.”

“The ACV-30 adds an important capability for Marines as we shift back to maritime expeditionary operations providing enhanced direct-fire lethality with Kongsberg’s 30mm fully stabilized weapon system,” said Christopher Melkonian, PM AAA at PEO Land Systems, United States Marine Corps. “Commonality within our lethality solutions provides benefits to the Marine Corps beyond the ACV program, streamlining training, concepts of operation and logistics.”

ACV-30 is one of four variants in the next-generation ACV family of vehicles designed, developed and built by BAE Systems, providing the U.S. Marine Corps with ship to shore capability in what will be a full replacement of the Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAV). The ACV-30 variant mounts Kongsberg’s stabilized, remotely operated MCT-30 that provides the capabilities and protection Marines need. The remote turret eliminates the space requirement of legacy turreted cannon systems, provides more room to transport troops or mission essential equipment and reduces weight for better mobility.   

The ACV-30 turret is an evolution of the medium caliber turret successfully deployed in various operational environments. It has also been selected for the Marine Corps’ Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle, providing commonality across the service. The turret is vehicle agnostic, able to accept armour and a variety of effectors, including anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM).

All remote weapon stations and remote turrets delivered to U.S. customers are manufactured in Kongsberg’s Johnstown, Penn. facility and leverage an extensive American supply base. For 20 years, Kongsberg has been the sole provider of these systems to the U.S. and delivery programs include the Marine Air Defence Integrated System (MADIS) RWS and the Commonly Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS) to the U.S. Army. More than 20,000 remote weapon stations and remote turrets have been produced in this facility since it opened in 2008.

This contract follows the purchase of long-lead items last winter to maintain production and delivery timelines for the U.S. Marine Corps’ ACV-30 program. The contract also includes negotiated options for additional systems. Initial deliveries are expected in the near future.

KONGSBERG in November 2024 announced a contract for long-lead items worth USD 51 million, signaling the start of the ACV-30 project. The order announced today is valued at about USD 118 million.

USMC Tests Mystery Ranch Military Light Frame Frame

Saturday, July 26th, 2025

Under the auspices of a Military Light Frame Limited User Evaluation, Marine Corps Systems Command is testing the Mystery Ranch Military Light Frame (formerly known as the Nylinear Individual Carrying Equipment Frame) for use with the Family of Improved Load Bearing Equipment pack. The MLF is a pound lighter than the NICE Frame. LUEs are used to either inform requirements or as a precursor to larger procurements.

Back in May during Modern Day Marine we showed you that the NICE Frame is compatible with the FILBE Pack.

Marine Corps Systems Command Explores Cutting-Edge Boot Designs to Enhance Warfighter Lethality

Friday, July 25th, 2025

To enhance the lethality of individual Marine warfighters, 25 School of Infantry-West instructors will spend the summer testing a new design for Marine Corps Systems Command’s (MARCORSYSCOM) Optional Boot Program.

This model, which features lighter weight materials, unique drainage ports for improved breathability, and improved ergonomics to reduce leg and back injuries, follows a similar evaluation that took place earlier this year at Camp Lejeune, N.C., where Marines with 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion tested footwear that included advanced orthotic technology.

“The entire process takes about six months,” explained Todd Towles, team lead for Clothing and Equipment, Combat Service Support Equipment (CSSE). “It’s all about determining the fit, form, function, and durability; all at a reasonable price point for the Marines.”

The Optional Boot Program ensures only the highest-performing footwear makes it to the field. The process begins with a detailed visual inspection assessing color shade consistency, proper height, weight, and overall workmanship. After passing this initial review, boots undergo four months of rigorous field testing—worn daily by active-duty Marines in demanding conditions.

“Never satisfied with the status quo, the Marine Corps always looks for ways to improve the warfighter experience,” said Force Recon Company Senior Enlisted Advisor Master Sgt. Andrew Perryman, 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion. “If a product isn’t meeting the standard then it’s cut from the inventory.”

Alongside this summer’s real-world evaluation, which will determine if the boots dry faster to allow for better foot health, lab testing further validates durability, comfort, and quality, reinforcing the Corps’ commitment to providing Marines with superior equipment designed to weather the most challenging missions.

“We see the Optional Boot Program as a way to access the best technology and give Marines more options on fit, performance, and availability on the shelves,” said Maj. Joshua Foster, project officer for CSSE. “We need a diverse set of vendors to ensure we can sustain the fleet’s needs—that has been a serious challenge based on supply chain and quality issues over the last several years.”

The program office for Combat Support Systems (CSS) plays a crucial role in life cycle management for all clothing and individual equipment issued to Marines supporting global operations. From concept development through testing, procurement, fielding, and sustainment, this office ensures that every item meets the toughest standards for performance and durability in extreme environments. The Marine Corps’ rigorous evaluation protocols—often conducted in the most austere conditions—set a high mark.

“Our primary concern is equipping our Marines with quality gear, when they need it,” said Towles, a Marine veteran who has worked with MARCORSYSCOM for almost 20 years. “Anything less and we’re failing them.”

“Through joint clothing boards, we can share test data and lessons learned across DoD. We also seek to adopt equipment tested by the other services to save the Marine Corps on costs and evaluation time; especially when tasks or environments are common among service members. It is a great partnership,” remarked Foster.

This collaboration increases the buying power of the Marine Corps and Joint Force.

“With mission success often hinging on staying warm, dry, and mobile, the meticulous efforts of our team guarantees that Marines are equipped with top-tier gear that embodies the Corps’ unwavering commitment to excellence,” said Towles. “Certification is not permanent; we conduct frequent inspections with our Marine Corps Exchange partners to ensure Marine clothing and footwear continues to meet our standards.”

Illustrating that point, by continuing to push for quality and performance, the CSS team recently identified the delivery of deficient US-made footwear.

“Once we discovered the issue, the program office along with the boot vendor did an MCX-enterprise inspection and identified all stock not acceptable by Marine standards,” said Towles.

Nearly 25 percent of the boots were returned to manufacturers—ultimately preventing Marines from buying substandard gear.

“We were disappointed with them missing the mark, but pleased with their response,” said Towles. “Our vendors understand that the Marine Corps has high standards when it comes to our uniform items, even if the materials are part of an optional purchase. The vendors understand the Marine Corps has a high bar and they will be dropped from the program and removed from our shelves if they do not maintain quality.”

In a briefing last Spring, Col. Paul Gillikin, discussed several key factors impacting this product line such as competition, supply chain, and quality assurance.

“Over the last several years, the Marine Corps and Department of Defense has been challenged in uniforms, uniform accessories, personal protective gear, and footwear,” said Gillikin, program manager for CSS. “Starting with COVID production and supply chain issues, many of our domestic industry partners could not keep up with demand due to staffing shortfalls, access to materials, or quality.”

Gillikin, who has served as the program manager for CSS for two years, explained there have been several instances of acute and long-term issues with uniform items while his team sought new, innovative technologies to improve the performance of Marines while lowering costs.

“We have a great relationship and a lot of successes with our vendors, however, corrective actions and quality assurance problems with some have been a burden that distracts us from seeking better equipment,” he said. “The optional certification program allows us to reach both U.S. and [Trade Agreement Act] manufacturers with a low barrier to entry for vendors and low-cost testing for the Marine Corps. In the long term, an increased number of vendors leads to lower prices and greater innovation. We as a [Department of Defense] enterprise have to be sensitive to that and stimulate a diverse array of manufacturers to include domestic and TAA compliant sources. The bottom line is that the Optional Boot Program incentivizes competition and challenges vendors to actively manage their supply chains and produce the best technology at a lower cost for Marines.”

Currently, most optional boots that are approved to wear, and available for purchase, fall between $189 to $399 retail.

“When I talk with Marines around the fleet, they bring up affordability, access, and quality of materials,” said Gillikin. “It’s an important factor to Marines, and some are struggling financially. Cost is already a central metric for me, but it takes on a whole different level when you talk with younger Marines that are trying to support a family.”

To this end, CSS recently screened additional domestic and Trade Agreement Act (TAA) compliant materials.

“Competition is driving innovation,” said Gillikin. “Marines are excited to test and use the equipment! Our team does supply chain surveillance to ensure quality and supplies come from compliant countries. We are in constant communication with industry, other joint force program offices, Marine Corps stakeholders, the Defense Logistics Agency, and our partners on Capitol Hill to ensure our needs are met.”

Gillikin also said their communication efforts include potential future needs of the Marines Corps as well.

“We expect the next war to be a heavily contested environment where stockpiling and additional sources of supply will be vital,” he said. “For risk reduction, my team has war-gamed multiple scenarios for building prepositioning stockpiles using domestic and TAA manufacturers along with direct shipping TAA compliant gear straight into theater during conflict into areas such as the First Island Chain and High North. We need to keep all options on the table – competition directly supports operational effectiveness and readiness.”

For more information about the Marine Corps Systems Command’s Optional Boot Program and its certification process, visit www.marcorsyscom.marines.mil.

Story by Clinton Firstbrook 

Marine Corps Systems Command

SMARTSHOOTER Receives New Order from U.S. Marine Corps for SMASH 2000L Fire Control Systems

Monday, July 14th, 2025

This latest order represents the next step toward broader fielding of the SMASH fire control systems across the Marine Corps

[July 14, 2025] – SMARTSHOOTER, a world-class designer, developer, and manufacturer of innovative fire control systems, is proud to announce that its U.S. subsidiary, SMARTSHOOTER Inc., has received a new order from the United States Marine Corps (USMC) for its SMASH 2000L fire control systems.

The Marine Corps is procuring SMASH 2000L as an interim capability to address its urgent requirement for dismounted Counter-small-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS) solutions. The USMC gained hands-on experience with the system through earlier testing, and this latest order represents the next step towards full adoption across the entire Marine Corps.

SMASH 2000L—SMARTSHOOTER’s lightest handheld-operated fire control system—leverages artificial intelligence, computer vision, and advanced tracking algorithms to enable dismounted forces to detect, track, and precisely eliminate aerial and ground threats. Especially effective against drones and sUAS, SMASH 2000L provides a reliable and combat-proven hard-kill solution to an evolving and urgent battlefield threat.

Initially tested and selected by the U.S. Joint Counter-small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office (JCO) and the Irregular Warfare Technical Support Directorate (IWTSD) (formally known as the Counter-Terrorism Technical Support Office) as the kinetic solution for squad-level counter-drone missions, the SMASH system continues to gain traction across multiple branches of the U.S. military. It has already been fielded by U.S. Special Forces, the Marine Corps, and several NATO allies.

Michal Mor, CEO of SMARTSHOOTER, said:

“With SMASH 2000L, dismounted Marines are equipped with an effective, combat-proven solution against the growing threat of drones on the battlefield. This new order is an important step toward  potential adoption of the SMASH fire control systems at the squad level, and we remain committed to supporting the Marine Corps with cutting-edge, operationally proven kinetic capabilities.”

Combat-proven and deployed by defense and security forces in the U.S., Israel, the U.K., NATO, and other allied nations, SMARTSHOOTER’s SMASH family of Fire Control Systems enhances precision, situational awareness, and lethality—ensuring every shot counts.

For more information, visit www.smart-shooter.com

MARADMIN 237/25 – Marine Corps Policy on the Wear and Purchase of Body Armor and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Monday, July 14th, 2025

Published in late May, the US Marine Corps guidance for the wear of PPE, restricting it to only issued items which have undergone testing and are on approved use lists. This ends the use of private purchase and commercial off the shelf items unless on the approved lists detailed in the message.

Below is the message followed by a video explaining the policy. We have redacted the email addresses and phone numbers of the POCs but they are easily found via Google search for this message.

R 201307Z MAY 25
MARADMIN 237/25
MSGID/GENADMIN/CMC PPO POF WASHINGTON DC/FOO2//
SUBJ/MARINE CORPS POLICY ON THE WEAR AND PURCHASE OF BODY ARMOR AND PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)//
REF/A/MSGID: MSG/CMC WASHINGTON DC PPO/YMD: 20070417//
REF/B/MSGID: GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC PPO: 20090416//
REF/C/MSGID: GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC PPO: 20090710//
REF/D/MSGID: GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC PPO: 20170327//
REF/E/MSGID: GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC PPO: 20181127//
REF/F/MSGID: GENADMIN/COMMMARCORSYSCOM: 20240509//
REF/G/MSGID: GENADMIN/COMMMARCORSYSCOM: 20240807//
REF/H/MCO 6260.3A SD: 20160926//
NARR/REF A IS MARADMIN 262/07, Marine Corps Policy on the Wear  and Purchase of Body Armor and Personal Protective Equipment 
(PPE). Ref b is MARADMIN 254/09, Marine Corps Policy on the  Wear of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).  Ref c is MARADMIN 415/09, Establishment of Body Armor Protection Levels. 
Ref d is MARADMIN 151/17, change 1 to Marine Corps Policy on the Wear and Purchase of Body Armor and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Ref e is MARADMIN 667/18 Marine Corps Policy on the Wear and Purchase of Body Armor and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Ref f is the Safety of Use Message for the Enhanced Combat Helmet and High Cut Enhanced Combat Helmet Suspension Systems. Ref g is the Safety of Use Message for the Enhanced Combat Helmet with Hearing Enhancement Device. Ref h is the Marine Corps Hearing and Conservation Program.//
POC/E.T. Clark/COL/PPO POF/Branch Head/
POC/E.A. Benson/CIV/PPO POF/Dep Branch Head/
GENTEXT/REMARKS/1. The Commandant of the Marine Corps directs the following policy for Marines and Sailors assigned to USMC and joint commands, on the wear and purchase of body armor and PPE. This MARADMIN supersedes references (a, b, c, d, and e). PPE refers to Marine Corps approved body armor, helmets, goggles, gloves, clothing, and other gear designed to protect the wearer’s body from battlefield injuries. The equipment and
training information for service-approved PPE systems can be found at https://app.mcboss.usmc.mil searching via program office: PMM-154.3 and via Marine Net course # mcsppe0306 – Proper use of Personal Protective Equipment
2.  Individual Marines/Sailors may not use commercial PPE in lieu of government tested, approved, and issued PPE as outlined in the product information sheets referenced in paragraph 1.
Commanders are not authorized to utilize unit funds to purchase commercial PPE items that have not been approved for use by Marine Corps Systems Command.
3.  Ballistic spectacles and goggles authorized for use are listed on the authorized protective eyewear list (APEL) and are compatible with the universal prescription lens carrier. While the Marine Corps will continue to issue a single spectacle and a single goggle, units may purchase other authorized ballistic eyewear on the APEL through the defense logistics agency or the post-exchange. The latest APEL can be found at:
https://www.peosoldier.army.mil/equipment/
approved-eyewear-qpl/

4.  All forms of hearing protection devices are considered PPE, and the Marine Corps issues Hearing Enhancement Devices (HED) (TAMCN C01142F) and High Noise Hearing Enhancement Devices (HN-HED) (TAMCN C00142F). Commanders must ensure Marines comply with ref (f) or ref (g) for helmet configuration and ref (h) guidelines to select appropriate hearing protection devices.
HEDS shall be evaluated at least twice per year for appropriate use and to replace any worn/deteriorated seals per ref (h).
Commanders will consult navy medicine occupational audiologists or industrial hygienists to determine from sound pressure measurements appropriate hearing protective devices for their operational needs, ensuring Marines have the correct single or dual hearing protection when necessary. Per ref (h), the safety objective is to protect Marines’ exposure to any steady-state noise having an 8-hour time-weighted average noise level greater than or equal to 85 decibels: or a single exposure to impulse and/or impact noise of 140 decibels peak or greater, regardless of duration.
5.  Marine Corps Body Armor Protection Levels (APLS).
5.a.  A service-level policy defining specific armor protection levels has been established with the intent of standardizing APLS, enabling commanders to tailor armor protection based on their estimate of the situation or based on guidance from service/joint/theater combatant commanders. Higher APLS provide increased ballistic protection through the addition of modular armor components, increasing the areas of coverage and/or ballistic protection. Higher APLS correspond to greater weight, increased thermal loading, and reduced mobility, thus degrading individual and unit performance over extended periods of time.
5.b.  The following APLS are established and apply to all Marine Corps-issued armor systems. Read in two columns:
APL             Description 
Level 0         No body armor worn 
Level 1         Marine Corps-issued plate carrier with soft armor only (defeats handgun and fragmentation threats)
Level 2         Marine Corps-issued plate carrier with soft armor, and front and back hard armor plates (defeats rifle and fragmentation threats)
Level 3         Marine Corps-issued plate carrier with soft armor, front and back hard armor plates, and side hard armor plates (defeats rifle and fragmentation threats).
Removal of the soft armor from the plate carrier compromises the ballistic protection of the issued armor systems. Soft armor must be worn in conjunction with ballistic plates in the issued plate carrier – failure to do so may result in severe bodily injury or death. There are currently two variants of ballistic plates fielded to the Fleet Marine Force: the Enhanced Small Arms Plate Insert (ESAPI) (TAMCN C30202E) and the Lightweight Plate (LWP) (TAMCN C01342F). Commanders may choose to utilize either variant based on the threat.
5.c.  The Marine Corps-issued helmets authorized for operations include the Enhanced Combat Vehicle Crewman Helmet (ECVCH) (TAMCN C49942F), Enhanced Combat Helmet (ECH) (TAMCN C01202E), High Cut Enhanced Combat Helmet (HC ECH) (TAMCN C02222F), and the Integrated Helmet System (IHS) (TAMCN C02222F) which were designed to provide both ballistic and blunt impact protection across the full spectrum of operational environments. The helmets consist of a shell, a suspension system (pads), a retention system (chinstrap), and include other accessories such as a night vision device mounting bracket and rail systems.
The ballistic protection of these systems is provided by the construction and materials of the shell. The blunt impact protection is provided by the construction, materials, and configuration of the suspension system. The suspension system must have pads in an approved configuration. In accordance with ref (f) or ref (g) the issued suspension system cannot be replaced with commercial pads. The screws in the helmet support the ballistic integrity and shall not be replaced with commercial screws. Unit leaders will ensure initial training is conducted for Marines upon issue of the helmet. Commanders shall ensure approved helmets are worn in an approved configuration.
5.d. Diving life preserver and buoyancy compensator listed in the authorized for navy use (ANU) are not authorized for ballistic protection until the configuration has been certified and approved by Marine Corps Systems Command. Commanders interested in requesting diving life preserver and buoyancy compensator for certification must follow the universal needs
process. Information can be found at: https://www.cdi.marines.mil/units/cdd/universal-needs-process/
5.e. Protective attachments may be worn with
Marine Corps-issued body armor. It is impractical to establish APLS that incorporate every possible configuration in which these attachments may be worn. Commanders will designate the wear of Marine Corps approved helmets; ballistic eyewear; and groin, neck, and throat protection as required by their units’ mission, the threat, and local environmental considerations.
5.f. The lightweight helmet (TAMCN C32152E) and the small arms protective body armor (stocklist-3 item of TAMCN C35012E) are only authorized for use by training command.
5.g. Ballistic protection vendor samples are not authorized for use without Marine Corps Systems Command oversight and approved safety releases for limited user evaluations.
6. Authority
6.a. Operating force commanders at the Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) level or higher are authorized to determine the required level of PPE (or APL when established) for wear by assigned personnel within the Marine Corps Systems Command approved systems. This determination will be made based on mission(including during training), unit type, threat, and environmental factors.
6.b.  Combatant, Joint Task Force (JTF), and service component commanders retain the authority to prescribe the level of protection worn by all assigned personnel. In cases where combatant, JTF, and/ or service component commanders have established a required level of PPE that is more restrictive than that set by Marine Unit Commanders, Marines will adhere to the highest level. In cases where the APL is not designated, the Marine Corps service policy places the authority to designate the APL on commanders, Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) and higher.
6.c.  Based on their unique mission requirements, Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC) personnel may, within published MARSOC policies and subject to their commanders’ approval, wear special operations command-approved special purpose body armor.
6.d.  Installation commanders are authorized to use government funds to purchase commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) body armor and PPE only for use by Military Police performing law enforcement duties aboard Marine Corps installations. COTS body armor must, at a minimum, meet National Institute of Justice (NIJ)-certified level RF2 as listed on the NIJ website.
https://www.nij.gov/topics/technology/body-armor/pages/compliant-ballistic-armor.aspx. COTS body armor purchased for installation law enforcement duty will not be worn by Marines as a substitute for Marine Corps approved body armor and PPE in a combat zone or theater of operation.
7.  Marine Corps organizations that do not receive class II PPE materiel support from the Logistics Command should direct all materiel requirements to DC, IL, IP.
8.  Release authorized by MajGen J. L. Morris, Assistant Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies, and Operations.//