TYR Tactical

Archive for the ‘SOF’ Category

PEO-M Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) Poseidon’s Fury Collaboration Event

Wednesday, August 5th, 2026

This one is pretty short notice. On August 26, 2026, SOFWERX, in collaboration with USSOCOM Program Executive Office Maritime (PEO-M), will host an event with industry to provide Special Operations Forces (SOF) operators, and Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) vendors with opportunities for collaboration, hands-on experimentation, and assessment. The data collected during these events will directly inform the development of USV Mission-Aligned Reference Architecture (MARA).  MARA is intended to enhance Joint Force interoperability, accelerate capability integration, and reduce unnecessary expenditures associated with redundant, SOF-specific platform development.

Request to Attend NLT 14 August 2026 11:59 PM ET

events.sofwerx.org/peo-m-unmanned-surface-vehicle-usv

MARSOC: Automated Armory Collaboration Event

Friday, July 31st, 2026

Picture Perfect Accountability

SOFWERX, in collaboration with USSOCOM Marine Forces Special Operations Command (MARSOC), will host a collaboration event on 17 September 2026, to identify innovative technologies and technical approaches that modernize serialized ground ordnance accountability. The event will focus on reducing manual administrative processes through secure digital inventory management, automated documentation, and integrated identification/scanning capabilities while improving accountability, audit readiness, and operational efficiency.

MARSOC armories maintain thousands of serialized weapons, optics, lasers, night vision devices, communications equipment, and other controlled assets that routinely transfer custody among operators, maintenance activities, and storage locations. Current accountability processes rely heavily on manual inventories, handwritten forms, repetitive data entry, and multiple independent records. These processes are labor intensive, susceptible to human error, and consume significant man-hours while increasing accountability risk.

MARSOC seeks commercially available technologies or innovative solutions capable of digitizing armory operations while remaining compatible with existing accountability requirements. Desired capabilities include secure Common Access Card (CAC-enabled user) authentication, automated equipment issue and recovery, inventory tracking, documentation, audit logging, equipment location management, and integrated scanning technologies that reduce administrative burden without compromising accountability. 

The purpose of this collaboration event is to partner with industry innovators to design a secure, zero-signature automated armory that relies exclusively on optical recognition and computer vision. To maintain strict operational security and eliminate detectable RF signals, this initiative prohibits the use of RFID, active Bluetooth, or radiating digital transmitters. Instead, this event challenges industry partners to develop a passive, image-based inventory system where weapons, gear, and serial numbers are automatically tracked, verified, and logged simply by taking a digital photo or scanning an optical image as items enter or exit the facility. This approach will eliminate slow, legacy paper-based workflows and human-error bottlenecks while guaranteeing absolute property accountability without exposing our facilities to electronic detection. 

Request to Attend NLT 16 August 2026 11:59 PM ET

Learn more here.

Pentagon’s Special Ops Office to Host Rapid Tech Innovation Event

Friday, July 24th, 2026

The fourth and final line of effort in the 2026 National Defense Strategy calls for the supercharging of the defense industrial base; and within that effort is a call to grow nontraditional vendors.

To that end, the War Department’s Office of the Assistant Secretary of War for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict will host a one-day “accelerator” event, July 24, in the national capital region, in which representatives from more than a dozen companies will have the opportunity to pitch innovative solutions across nine areas related to the military’s special operations community.

The event comes as the office is seeking ways to rapidly innovate technologies and get them into the hands of warfighters quicker than the traditional acquisition avenues.

“Traditionally, in acquisition, there’s a lot of work and energy around the government figuring out what it needs and then telling industry to just build what it thinks it needs; and this is flipping the script on that,” explained Bonnie Evangelista, the office’s acquisition director for the Secretariat for Special Operations.

Rather, she said, the office is working to identify what the mission needs and then identify what industry-driven solutions already exist on the market that can meet that.

“That is a complete 180 from [a traditional] acquisition perspective,” Evangelista said, noting that the state of battlefield technology is rapidly changing in a matter of hours and days rather than years and decades as in the past. 

The method the office incorporates into fielding these new technologies is likened to a “critical triangle,” wherein warfighters are put in direct contact with private-sector innovators, as well as acquisition industry experts who understand the fiscal and contractual aspect of getting the new technology into the field.

“We are doing this accelerator event specifically to highlight the might of that triangle coming together to leverage, and kind of put pen to paper on what [Secretary of War Pete Hegseth] is talking about [regarding] empowering the warfighter [and] creating faster spirals to get technology into the field — and doing that in a very, very short time frame,” said Carmella Teeter, deputy assistant secretary of war for special operations analysis, resources and capabilities.

Whereas many traditional acquisition processes can take three or more years to get from awarding of a contract to putting the new technology into the field, the goal for getting any innovative approach or capability that the office selects for acquisition into the field is six months or less, with contracts being awarded the day of the event.

To get participants for the accelerator event, the team called for short proposal submissions, asking each applicant for a two-page white paper proposal on how they would address certain challenges.

Soon, the office received nearly 700 applications, which were eventually narrowed down to 15 organizations being invited to the July 24 event.

During the day of the event, participants will give an initial presentation consisting of an oral presentation, technical brief and government question-and-answer session.

Any project selected during the first phase — or gate — will be awarded an initial $10,000, with the eligibility to be invited to the second gate of the event and potentially be awarded an additional $50,000 if the technology meets government mission requirements.

Those companies that pass the second gate will then proceed to the third gate, which is prototype delivery, followed by the final gate of production.

“[The accelerator] is very focused on trying to break down those barriers to entry that we see in particular with small businesses and the startups,” Teeter said, adding that the goal is to cut bureaucracy and create synergy by way of the aforementioned critical triangle.

Teeter said that what ultimately drives projects like the upcoming accelerator event is the necessity to remember that the warfighters deserve to have the best technology at their disposal, and as quickly as possible.

“We owe that to these people that are going to be asked to solve the impossible problems,” she said. “We owe them unfair advantage on the battlefield, and that’s what this is all designed to do: to give our warfighters unfair advantage by making sure that we remember from all the way up to the senior levels here in the [War Department] that their voice and their comfort level with that technology is the thing that we care about most; and we want to empower them to have a say in their future with that.”

If the upcoming event ultimately proves successful, Teeter said she could envision similar events also permeating throughout the department.

By Matthew Olay, Pentagon News

Submissions Open for AFSOC’s Thunder Dome 2027 Innovation Competition

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2026

HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. —  

Calling all AFSOC innovators for the fourth annual Thunder Dome. The submissions window for ideas is now open for AFSOC’s innovation competition known as Thunder Dome. All submissions received by Sept. 13, 2026, will be considered. 

This competition is open to any member within the command, and ideas can be submitted at gain.il4.afwerx.dso.mil/usaf/afsoc-thunderdome-2027, ?which is a CAC only enabled site. 

Finalists will be selected based on multiple factors including impact on readiness/advantage, alignment with AFSOC strategy, and feasibility of execution. Finalists will present their ideas on Nov. 19, 2026, for the chance to receive funding to further develop their innovative solutions and put them into action across the command. 

To ensure we maintain our decisive advantage against evolving global threats, events like Thunder Dome empower Air Commandos to lean into our ethos of grassroots innovation by tackling issues impacting readiness and AFSOC’s ability to operate across the spectrum of competition, ensuring we remain relevant through adaptation. 

We must invest today in the capabilities we will need tomorrow. We look forward to seeing the great ideas Air Commandos share in this year’s competition. 

Heads Up! SBIR 26.BZ Release 4 Pre-Release from SOFWERX

Tuesday, July 7th, 2026

The USSOCOM Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program will soon be accepting submissions for these technology areas of interest:

Direct to Phase II Topics:

SOC26BZ04-DV004: Advanced Stand-off Detection of Concealed Materials (ASDCM)

SOC26BZ04-DV005: Replanning for Evasive Autonomy to Counter Threats (REACT)

Submissions Open 22 July 2026 at 12:00 PM ET (Noon)

SOFWERX will host a virtual Q&A session for the areas of interest on 09 July at 12:00 PM ET and 1:00 PM ET. RSVP to the Q&A session at events.sofwerx.org/sbir-26-bz-release-4.

Silent Professionals Set the Conditions for Red Flag Success

Saturday, July 4th, 2026

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska — In the brisk Alaskan air, on a steep hillside overlooking the vast terrain, U.S. Army Special Forces Soldiers assigned to 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) are preparing for one of the region’s most demanding combat training exercises: Red Flag-Alaska.

For decades, Red Flag-Alaska has provided aircrews with the opportunity to train against realistic threats under contested conditions, building experience and confidence before facing real-world adversaries. Yet while fighter aircraft streak across the sky above the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex, another fight begins long before the first jet takes to the air.

Inside a nondescript room on Eielson Air Force Base, Green Berets huddled around maps, terrain imagery and mission graphics covering nearly every available table and wall space. Tactical communications equipment fills the corners of the room while planners refine timelines and routes. A briefing slide advances across a wall-mounted television, detailing the next day’s mission.

The ground force commander spoke with precision, pointing to a route displayed on the screen. It was a surprising shift. Moments earlier, the team had been smiling, joking and laughing with each other. Now, they were all business, shifted into attentive and deliberate professionals. Routes, contingencies and communications plans were discussed with the matter-of-fact tone of a team who had rehearsed the process countless times before. The mission is part of Operation Close Shave, the ground component executed by the Green Berets in support of the large scale combat operations exercise scenario.

While fighter aircraft may be the most visible element of Red Flag, they are rarely the spearhead of the operation, Green Berets shaping the battlefield before they leave the runway.

Before aircraft can operate freely in contested airspace, special operations forces work deep within contested or enemy territory to identify threats, gather intelligence and create conditions that allow the joint force to maneuver. An ODA, or Operational Detachment-Alpha, the foundational unit of action for U.S. Army Special Forces, provides commanders with the information required to help clear a path for the aircraft and paratroopers that follow.

A two-hour trip south, near Delta Junction, brings the ODA to a pothole-filled side road, Denali’s peak reaching out of the horizon like someone painted it onto the sky. Alaska’s natural beauty served as a somewhat dangerous distraction while in the opposing force’s territory; the simulated country borders indicated that the team was well behind “enemy” lines.

A group of individuals on the roadside approached the lead vehicle, the driver became cautious before realizing these were allied counterparts, operators and paratroopers from the Belgian 3 PARA (Regiment). From wary to relieved, all are smiling as introductions were exchanged and the Belgians offered to show the way to the “safe house.” Safe houses act as bases of operations for Special Forces operators; while not necessarily a house in many cases, they act as both a command center, shelter, cover, and concealment from enemy forces and civilian populations, respectively.

This particular safe house, The Alaska Flour Company is a real-world business and working farm that would function as the team’s base of operations for the next week, playing into their scenario simulated cover story as seasonal farm workers in the area; an effort to blend in with the local populace. Equipped with fake IDs and cover stories, the option to fight was only ever considered as a last course of action.

The wooden structure housing the teams was not much more than a long, wide, dark, open corridor used for grain processing, the structure being colder inside than it was out. The Belgians had set up a barrel fire outside to warm their extremities from the frigid interior of the flour plant. One of them said something in Dutch as the others around the fire laughed, stoking the flames. It was a moment of relaxation and comfort before the long days ahead.

Hours later, vivid colors painted the Alaskan sky as the multinational team of special operators moved quietly along a riverbank, carrying the equipment they would need for days of reconnaissance.

The absence of darkness during the far north’s summer nights increased the risk of detection during their no-fail reconnaissance mission. Heavy animal activity in the form of large predator’s leftover meals served as constant reminders of the dangers posed by the wildlife surrounding them. With the high-risk environment in mind, the operators set up fallback positions, established communications with rear command elements and edged toward their objectives.

Using a mix of fieldcraft and technology, the teams split into two-man elements and traversed through thick woods toward the scenario’s air defense objectives.

Through the brush, a fenced-off compound emerged ahead, revealing large mockup integrated air defense systems depicting surface-to-air missile launchers, radars and other mobile air defense equipment. The mock missile launchers hidden among the trees represented exactly the type of threat Red Flag planners wanted the ODA, and their allied counterparts, to confront.

In the exercise scenario, a network of integrated air defense systems, radar sites and command-and-control nodes formed layered barriers, designated to deny access and maneuvering capability to coalition aircraft. These systems force pilots to contend with threats capable of detecting and engaging their aircraft long before they reach critical objectives.

Finding those threats is where special operations provide a critical advantage. Small teams, specializing in operating in hostile, denied and contested environments, infiltrate challenge areas to observe targets, evaluate and/or confirm intelligence and develop a comprehensive picture of the operational environment. The information they collect helps commanders distinguish between suspected targets and verified threats, reducing uncertainty before air assets are committed.

In an era increasingly defined by technological advantages such as satellites, drones and electronic sensors, it may be tempting to assume technology alone can provide every answer. However, modern battlefields remain environments of constant adaptation, where adversaries actively employ camouflage, deception, electronic warfare measures/countermeasures and other techniques designed to obscure themselves and their operations. A target detected by one sensor may prove to be a decoy when observed from the ground. Even the most advanced collection platforms can produce incomplete or conflicting information when confronted by a determined adversary. In the end, commanders often still rely on someone physically confirming at the target site and reporting accurate and timely information.

“The problem with satellite sensors is they have a harder time maintaining eyes on,” said one of the Special Forces Soldier. “If we are able to get behind enemy lines and conduct an operation like this, there’s a constant ground sensor.”

For ODAs, fieldcraft, observation and direct confirmation remain indispensable tools. The ability to physically verify with eyes on a target provide joint forces commanders a level of certainty that technology alone cannot always deliver. In a contested environment, that assurance can mean the difference between a successful air campaign and aircraft flying into unknown threats.

“We are deep behind enemy territory trying to open the air corridor and allow conventional forces to parachute in and gain control of this area,” the Soldier said. “We’re here in support of the main effort, which is the joint force entry of the 11th Airborne Division, so they can jump in, get boots on the ground and begin taking control of key terrain or infrastructure.”

The ODAs remained concealed among moss-covered logs and dense vegetation bordering the clearing, quietly observing and transmitting information while remaining mindful of OPFOR operating in the area.

“No troop transport planes, C-17s or anything like that, can gain access to this airspace to conduct an air operation until these are taken out,” the Soldier declared. For the next several days, reconnaissance and observation remained the primary mission. Operators relied on their advanced knowledge of wilderness survival skills, keeping fire going, supplementing field rations with food gathering and demonstrating basic shelter construction. Despite the constant sunlight, temperatures plunged into the low 30s overnight. Frigid hours bundled in waterproof clothing without a heat source were but a glimpse into the conditions special operations personnel endure during real-world operations.

Although they had not yet encountered OPFOR, the implications of doing so remained top of mind.

“… The risk is detection and compromise,” the Soldier explained. “A mission like this in real life is extremely dangerous.” The Soldier emphasized, in no uncertain terms, just how perilous a task this can be. It was a sobering assessment. But how do operators mitigate that risk? “That’s why we do training like this,” he continued. “To figure out where our gaps are. Figure out where we need to improve. The only way you can infiltrate this deep, in my opinion, is by blending in, maintaining a very low signature and a very low pattern of life.”

During a quiet moment of the perpetual daylight, around 3 a.m., coffee simmered in a portable carafe one operator had carried into the field. A reminder that even among highly trained professionals, caffeine remains less a luxury than a necessity.

It was much the same for the next few days — observing and reporting — though it was hardly monotonous in the beautiful Alaskan wilds, especially when broken up by the appearance of wandering wildlife in the distance.

The day of the culminating event arrived, having moved to a mountainside near Fort Greely. Another Special Forces Soldier sat at an observation post overlooking an FLS, or field landing strip. Although runway-sized, was more or less a stretch of dirt that had been flattened and cleared of the pervasive brush that blanketed the rolling terrain.

The Soldier could see the opposing forces’ vehicles moving along the strip, ant sized from the nestled vantage point amongst the thick shrubbery adorning the mountainside. Crouched still while waiting for word on a strike mission, he discussed the role of the Belgian counterparts.

“So they’re going to be at the north end of the [drop zone]. Their leadership right now is co-located with [ground force commander] out here at the MSS,” the other ODA team member said, referring to the mission support site. “But they’re going to be at the north end of the DZ and they’re going to try to take a sniper shot to take out a guy with a man-portable air defense. He’s carrying an SA14. Going to try to find him… and then that way we can bring in [combat air support] and we can facilitate close air support, and help enable the joint forcible entry by the 11th Airborne Division.”

Put simply, the mission was to remove the threat preventing joint force aircraft from entering the area of operations — a task that was certainly easier said than done. Less than an hour later, the answer arrived with the roar of an F-16 Fighting Falcon overhead as it rolled in on its targets.

With the air defense systems neutralized, the spread-out teams gathered on the sloping overlook to watch the dozens of transport aircraft — American C-130s and Belgian A400Ms — begin to drop paratroopers by the score along the FLS. The ground forces’ mission was complete. Fighter jets and transports successfully reached the objective, and as the crack of the infantry’s weapons rang out over the peaks, the hasty exfiltration back to the vehicles began.

But the TACP, or tactical air control party, had one last surprise in store for the rest of the ODA. Confirming the transport craft had cleared the airspace, they radioed yet again, this time to the F-16s still circling the area and requested a “show of force.” While discussing what grid coordinates to give, one of the ODA members grinned and pointed. The unsuspecting range control contractors had been parked in their pickup trucks nearby for quite a while, breaking the illusion of the war game with their necessary presence. Still smiling, the TACP suggested, “How about them?”

Moments later, the F-16s screamed directly overhead, buzzing by the unsuspecting 4x4s, the frames of the trucks rattling as the contractors within suddenly jolted from their seats.

Descending toward the mountain pond vehicles were parked next to, Alaska revealed one last pleasant surprise. Grazing across the small body of water, a herd of caribou had come into the open, looking up and regarding the team with vague interest.

In the distance, the roar of jet engines was still audible, and as the ground forces’ role in Red Flag came to a concluded, the forces in the air were now free to dominate the battlefield, the conditions for success already set by the operators on the ground.

By SGT Nicholas Riccio

SOFWERX – Warfighter Radio Industry Day

Friday, July 3rd, 2026

SOFWERX and USSOCOM PEO-TIS are hosting a Warfighter Radio Industry Day August 11 to 13 at SOFWERX to gain a better understanding of the current market and the technical capabilities of a Key Leader Radio (KLR), an Intra Team Radio (ITR), and a Team Networking Device (TND).

USSOCOM has a critical need for reliable and secure communications for dismounted warfighters operating in a variety of challenging environments, including those that have denied, degraded, intermittent, and low-latency communication operational areas. Key Leader Radios (KLR), Intra Team Radios (ITR), and Team Networking Devices (TND) provide a multi-platform communications strategy enabling resilient, self-healing, and autonomous solutions for voice transmission, data transmission, and networking capabilities at the team and leadership levels.

This effort is for informational and planning purposes only and does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP).

U.S. Companies Only. Submit NLT 15 July 2026 11:59 PM ET.

events.sofwerx.org/peo-tis-radio-industry-day

USSOCOM Seeks Air Loitering Munition for Use with Fixed Wing Aircraft

Thursday, July 2nd, 2026

In a Sources Sought Notice issued recently to industry, Headquarters (HQ) USSOCOM Special Operations Forces (SOF), Acquisition, Technology & Logistics (AT&L), Program Executive Office-Fixed Wing (PEO-FW) is performing market research to understand Industry capability to deliver an Air Loitering Munition (ALM) Stand-Off Precision Guided Munition (SOPGM) with an extended range and capabilities beyond the current SOPGM portfolio. This capability was briefed by PEO-FW during SOF Week as it relates to the strike portfolio.

In particular they are seeking precision munitions which can be released from SOF fixed-wing air platforms (lugged munitions, Common Launch Tube (CLT) launched munitions or other release mechanism), preferably capable of employment from CLT.

Attributes:

Munition Weight: Not-to-exceed 95 lbs

System form factor:

For CLT form factor: 5.9 inch diameter, 42 inches max overall length.

For Lugged or other release mechanism: 14 inch lug spacing, 90 inches overall length (maximum), 9 inch diameter (maximum); release from either a BRU-71 or BRU-78

Seeker Assembly: Passive system (limited Radio Frequency emissions) with integrated Automatic Target Recognition (ATR)

Warhead/payload weight: maximize kinetic warhead in conjunction with munition NTE weight

Employment Environment: Contested and non-Contested with Intra Missile Communications

Minimum TRL 6

Range: min 75NM from launch point to loitering point – launch altitudes between 5000 to 30,000 feet MSL

Loitering Time: min 40min once reaching loitering point at altitudes between 500-3000 AGL

Speed: 50 -100 kts cruise and loitering, 100kts+ minimum dash speed on attack profile

C2 Integration: System shall support government-owned FANTOM Core collaborative mission autonomy to command and control the platform flight controller via a machine-to-machine (M2M) API and/or C2 integration via BMS (Battle Management System)

Logical/electrical Interface Capability: Identify compatibly, with substantiation, of 1553/UAI (via 1760) or BMS Generic CLT compatible  

Environmental Profile: Typical operational temperatures and dynamic forces associated with SOF aircraft

Mission Profile: Pre-planned routing with altitude changes and/or direct-to loiter point

Cost target: Best value at quantity points of 500, 1000, 3000 (ROM level costing sufficient)

Interested parties must submit a white paper by Jul 27, 2026 12:00 PM EDT.