TYR Tactical

Archive for the ‘Guest Post’ Category

New FDA Clearance Gives PTSD Patients More Precise, Effective Treatment Options

Sunday, August 23rd, 2026

Precision brain therapy uses new technology to target post-traumatic stress disorder at the source

HOUSTON, Texas—Approximately 17.5 veterans die by suicide every day in the United States, and 7% of veterans are diagnosed each year with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Against that backdrop, Texas A&M Health researchers are helping to advance a more personalized approach to treating the disorder.

New technology developed by Wave Neuroscience, a California-based company, in collaboration with the research team of Kenneth S. Ramos, MD, PhD, with the Texas A&M Health Institute of Biosciences and Technology, has recently received FDA clearance for a system that maps and treats the specific parts of the brain impacted by PTSD. While the results are being processed for public dissemination, the findings have demonstrated promising results to revolutionize PTSD treatment options.

PTSD is a mental health condition that can develop after exposure to an event beyond average stressors, like combat, accidents, natural disasters or other forms of violence. About 6% of people will develop PTSD symptoms in their lifetimes, with women and veterans experiencing much higher rates.

Since PTSD became an official diagnosis in 1980, the most common treatments have been talk therapy and serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications, such as sertraline and fluoxetine. But statistics show that those treatments don’t work for everyone.

A 2020 study reviewing medications for PTSD found that while some patients improved, many did not. Patients’ self-reported symptoms improved by 6.8 to 10.1 points, and only up to 10.9% achieved remission.

The Wave Neuroscience clinical trial revealed much more promising preliminary results, according to the company’s chief medical officer Erik Won, DO.

“In comparison to that study, our FDA trial reported a 52% reduction in symptoms, so more than a four-fold increase in efficacy,” Won said. “And more importantly, we saw 68% remission in our clinical trial. So, it’s really a quantum change, an inflection point in what we can offer to patients. From a clinical care perspective, that’s really meaningful.”

Making it personal

The treatment uses Magnetic e-Resonance Therapy (MeRT), a technology created by Wave Neuroscience that combines an electroencephalogram (EEG) with transcranial magnetic stimulation. The EEG records electrical activity of the brain, while TMS—which is already used to treat other mental health conditions—uses magnetic pulses through a coil placed on the scalp.

“Transcranial magnetic stimulation, or TMS, was previously FDA cleared for treatment-resistant depression,” Won said. “By adding an augmented AI derived multivariate algorithm, we were able to personalize protocols that received FDA clearance for post-traumatic stress disorder, which should open up market access to about 13 million people who may be struggling with PTSD.”

That personalization is at the heart of MeRT.

Ramos, a physician-scientist with decades of experience in precision medicine, focuses on treatment tailored to the specific person and ailment rather than a “one-size-fits-all” approach.

“Most clinical interventions for the treatment of PTSD do not work very well,” Ramos said. “So, this is a huge area where identifying interventions that could hopefully add quality of life to the people impacted by this disorder would be tremendously impactful.”

As a leading researcher in precision medicine, Ramos was the obvious choice for Wave Neuroscience to bring into their study, said Fred Walke, chief executive officer at the company.

TMS is typically done generically, Ramos explained, but MeRT takes it one step further by customizing it to the person being treated.

Each of us is 99.9% the same, but the 0.1% difference among us dramatically changes the picture. By tailoring the treatment to the individual, the researchers were able to work with that person’s brain specifically and demonstrate significant decreases in severity of PTSD symptoms.

Ramos compared the two treatments to fixing a leaky roof: TMS, he said, is like putting a tarp over the leak to address the symptoms, while MeRT is more targeted, akin to replacing the broken shingles and addressing the problem at its source.

Breaking the mold

The path to FDA clearance began in 2024, when MeRT received the FDA breakthrough design designation, said Rick Silva, PhD, executive director of clinical trials at the Institute of Biosciences and Technology.

This designation provides an expedited pathway for FDA review. Strict scientific and medical guidelines still must be met, but the designation can reduce some of the administrative tasks that can delay getting treatments to patients.

Reaching the final stages of FDA clearance is a time-consuming and rigorous task, but for those involved, it’s all worth it.

This project, Silva said, was especially gratifying because it began during the COVID-19 pandemic and moved very quickly for an FDA clearance. While medical device clinical trials typically take around a decade to complete and gain FDA clearance, this was done in just over two years, he said.

The rigor it takes to succeed in this space reflects the expertise and talent of the Wave Neuroscience team, and it could not have been done without them, he added.

“I’ve been involved in probably close to 1,000 projects in academic medical centers over the years at varying degrees of depth and detail,” Silva said. “Patients are why I do what I do. It’s hard, and the failure rate is high, and it’s a lot of work. But when you get to a point where something is going to benefit patients, it’s very professionally gratifying and personally gratifying in many ways as well.”

For Israel Liberzon, MD, distinguished professor in psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Texas A&M Naresh K. Vashisht College of Medicine, the clearance represents an important addition to the PTSD treatment landscape.

Liberzon served as the lead psychiatrist and PTSD expert for the study. He said once this treatment gets to patients, it will be the only non-medication treatment option for PTSD cleared by the FDA.

“Right now, the FDA has approved only two medications for PTSD,” Liberzon said. “It doesn’t mean that only two of them are used, but both are SSRIs. This is the first time that in addition to the medication, we have a non-medication option. There is psychotherapy that people use for PTSD, but psychotherapies require a lot of effort. People must participate actively, and many drop out because it’s too anxiety provoking. So now we have a unique alternative.”

The MeRT clinical trial involved five sessions per week over five to six weeks. The beneficial effects appear to be long-lasting beyond the termination of treatment.

“People living with PTSD have been left with trial-and-error treatment, medications and their side effects, and limited outcomes—even when treated by the most dedicated and experienced physicians,” Won said. “Wave’s FDA clearance signals a fundamentally different future: one in which PTSD can be objectively evaluated, precisely treated and meaningfully healed.”

The technology could eventually have applications beyond PTSD, Won said, including depression, anxiety and other conditions.

Hope on the horizon

For Leslie S. Prichep, PhD, chief scientific officer of Wave Neuroscience, the clearance signals a new era for mental healthcare.

“The FDA clearance of the MeRT System reflects decades of scientific research using electrophysiological biomarkers in identifying abnormal brain activity profiles and guiding personalized intervention strategies,” Prichep said. “We believe this represents an important advancement toward a more objective, data-informed model of mental healthcare.”

Walke said this alternative provides hope to those struggling with PTSD and their loved ones. He also hopes the more individualized approach will help reduce the stigma around mental health, as treatment becomes like putting a cast on a broken bone.

“One of the goals of the company is to create a platform for mental healthcare that uses objective imagery to help patients understand why they’re experiencing life the way that they are,” Walke said. “That insight, compounded with proven technologies, promises incredibly high efficacy when personalized.”

Alongside Texas A&M Health, Wave Neuroscience is working with key stakeholders to broaden access to the treatment and ensure it is affordable for patients through insurance coverage.

“Our hope is that this research and technology can be a catalyst for more widespread development and innovation of more effective, personalized and precision-guided treatments,” Won said. “This is proof positive that population-scale personalized medicine is not just an aspirational goal but is an achievable reality today.”

The MeRT team brings together decades of expertise spanning disciplines and technology, all with the goal of reducing suffering for people living with PTSD. FDA clearance brings them one step closer to that goal.

“Texas A&M has a very rich history of military and veteran priorities,” Ramos said. “It’s a no-brainer that Texas A&M faculty would be interested in and supportive of an initiative that hopefully would bring positive solutions to a big problem. And anything we could do to help alleviate that problem is going to go a long way towards making a difference in the individual’s life as well as the people who are close to them. I feel very fortunate that we at Texas A&M were meaningfully involved in this project.”

By LASHA MARKHAM for VITAL RECORD

Army Develops Ultra-Light Vehicle for Changing Battlefields

Sunday, August 23rd, 2026

Getting troops and equipment across the battlefield is a vital part of every theater operation — Soldiers and their kits, as well as spare ammunition and other supplies, all need to arrive quickly, with nothing left behind — or risk jeopardizing the mission.

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle and Humvee have done a great job at performing those tasks so far, but the battlefield is always changing. In some cases, those vehicles are too heavy and impractical for the task at hand. So, the Army chose to develop a new, ultra-light troop transport vehicle.

The Infantry Squad Vehicle is an ultra-light tactical vehicle that carries nine passengers and their equipment. Its evolution was informed by Soldier touchpoint events.

“We are extremely proud of this program and what we’ve been able to achieve in a short period of time,” said Susan Fung, Portfolio Acquisition Executive Maneuver Ground’s mobile brigade combat team deputy project manager. “In this high-stakes environment of modern warfare, playing it completely safe is often the most dangerous thing a leader can do for decades.”

Fung explained that the team is intentionally trading the illusion of a risk-free acquisition process for the ability to use commercial products and iterating with continuous Soldier feedback through the Army’s Transformation in Contact program.

“Traditional defense acquisition has prioritized its bureaucratic processes and zero-defect mentality over speed, and while well-intentioned, that approach often meant our Soldiers had to wait quite a bit for critical capabilities to reach the field,” she said.

Exponential Growth

The Infantry Squad Vehicle program began in 2019, with a procurement objective of 649 vehicles. However, based on Soldier feedback and TIC experimentation, Fung said Soldiers told them what they truly needed.

“This led to an explosive growth driven entirely by operational demand,” she added.

The number of vehicles required increased to 900 in February 2021. It increased two more times and was set at 2,593. In April 2025, the service approved the ISV utility variant and increased the Army procurement objective, bringing the total to 5,733 vehicles across both variants, Fung explained.

“In February of 2026, the Army established the current position objective and procurement objective at 11,582 vehicles,” she said. “That shows you the increased objective based on Soldier demand, and that’s really equivalent to about an 18-fold increase from the original requirement. Not because of requirements creep, but really because Soldiers validated the capability in the combat training environments and demanded more.”

John Hufstedler, the product director for ground mobility vehicles at PAE Maneuver Ground, said that connecting with the system’s mission was critical during the development of the vehicle.

“Early on, the ISV succeeded by staying locked-in. A few key requirements were transportability, [but] mobility and payload and resisting requirements creep,” he said, adding Army senior leaders kept the vehicle’s mission in focus.

“Anytime somebody wanted to add a radio with encrypted keys or hang another piece of encrypted equipment off the platform, leadership just didn’t buy into it. And that allowed the vehicle to stay focused and true to its mission, so we didn’t have to leave a Soldier back with the vehicle. All nine could go execute the mission and objective,” Hufstedler said.

The traditional acquisition approach allows custom military specifications, extensive government testing and sequential milestone gates. Hufstedler explained that this process can take four to 10 years, often resulting in cost overruns and technological obsolescence.

Instead, he explained that the ISV took the rapid acquisition approach, using commercial off-the-shelf solutions and minimal military modifications. That approach resulted in the first unit being equipped within 24 months.

Transparency Aids Progress

Taking a more risk-positive approach to developing the ISV required somewhat of a culture change within PAE Maneuver Ground. Specifically, it required more direct, transparent communication.

Hufstedler believes that leading by example, empathy, listening, incorporating team feedback into decisions and a willingness to stand by those decisions as leaders were key. He added that providing team autonomy, while clearly defining boundaries and success criteria and transparency at all levels of communication, also contributed to their success.

Next-generation Variants

“With the ISV program, we prove[d] that calculated risk works,” Hufstedler said. “We keep going back to commerciality — I think that has helped us a lot — trusting our Soldiers’ judgment and moving at the speed of relevance; I think we’ve delivered that capability.”

The Army’s willingness to accept commercial standards as a starting point and make the Soldiers the primary evaluators of the equipment will be critical to the success of developing ISV variants, he noted.

Fung said the team is currently developing the ISV heavy variant. It will include enhanced onboard power generation and storage capability to support next-generation command and control equipment.

“Overall, the ISV program is a great example of our acquisition reform, which allows getting capabilities to the field faster, leveraging commercial technologies while staying agile and giving Soldiers what they really want,” she said.

For more information, visit the CPE Ground website.

JACQUELINE M. HAMES is an editor with Behind the Frontlines. She has 15 years of writing, editing and reporting experience with the federal government, and has a B.A. in creative writing from Christopher Newport University.

The US Army Marksmanship Unit’s Instructor Training Group: Strengthening Lethality Through Expert Instruction

Saturday, August 22nd, 2026

The Instructor Training Group (ITG) of the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit (USAMU) is one of the Army’s most influential training assets. Based at Fort Benning, Georgia, the ITG delivers expert small-arms instruction to servicemembers across the force, ensuring marksmanship fundamentals, coaching skills and weapons proficiency remain at the highest possible standard.

Mission and Core Purpose The ITG’s mission is to increase small-arms lethality across the force by training servicemembers and developing instructors who can return to their units and elevate marksmanship programs. As part of USAMU’s broader training mission, the ITG provides:

• Mobile training teams that travel worldwide.

• Instructor development courses that teach Soldiers how to coach, evaluate and build sustainable marksmanship programs.

• Weapons-specific training aligned with Army doctrine and modernization efforts.

This dual focus—training shooters and training instructors—makes the ITG a force multiplier across the Army.

Training Methods and Curriculum ITG instruction blends data-driven training, doctrinal consistency and adaptable teaching methods. Training packages typically include:

• Baseline marksmanship assessments.

• Classroom instruction on preliminary marksmanship, ballistics, weapons familiarization, optics familiarization, shot analysis and coaching techniques.

• Hands-on weapons training with systems such as the M4, M17/M18 and emerging platforms like the M7/M8 rifle.

• Instructor development modules.

• Final evaluations measuring improvements in hit probability, consistency and proficiency.

The curriculum reinforces proven fundamentals while integrating modern optics, fire-control systems and Army lethality initiatives.

Verified Impact on Army Readiness Across its annual training cycle, the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit consistently delivers measurable improvements in small-arms proficiency—an impact strongly driven by the Instructor Training Group. On average, USAMU conducts about 80 training missions each year, providing advanced marksmanship instruction to more than 4,000 Soldiers.

One of the ITG’s greatest advantages—and a major selling point for commanders—is its ability to tailor every training mission to the unit’s specific needs. Commanders dictate the training intent, and ITG cadre build a customized program of instruction that focuses on the formation’s mission requirements, weapons systems and operational environment. Rather than selecting a preset course, units receive training built specifically around their mission parameters, ensuring relevance, efficiency and maximum lethality gains.

These tailored efforts produce significant, documented improvements in battlefield effectiveness. Servicemembers routinely achieve substantial increases in lethal-hit averages and overall marksmanship proficiency after completing an ITG training package, demonstrating the value of customized instruction delivered by expert cadre.

Together, these results highlight the ITG’s role as a critical contributor to Army readiness and small-arms modernization.

Reach Across the Army The ITG supports a wide range of Army organizations, including:

• Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training.

• ROTC Cadet Summer Training.

• Infantry and Armor Basic Officer Leader Courses.

• Maneuver Captain’s Career Course.

• National Guard and Reserve units.

• Partner-nation forces during joint training events.

• U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM).

• U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC).

ITG mobile training teams frequently travel to remote or resource-limited ranges, ensuring units across the Army receive expert instruction regardless of location.

Strategic Importance The Instructor Training Group is central to the Army’s long-term lethality strategy. By focusing on instructor development, the ITG ensures:

• Units maintain higher lethality long after training ends.

• Marksmanship doctrine remains standardized across the Army.

• New weapons and optics—such as the M7/M8 rifle and Next Generation Squad Weapon systems—are integrated effectively.

• Leaders at every level understand how to coach, evaluate and sustain marksmanship programs.

As small-arms proficiency becomes increasingly decisive in close combat, the ITG’s role is more vital than ever.

Contact The U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit’s Instructor Training Group can be reached at AMU-ITG@army.mil.

Story by LTC Michelle Lunato 

U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit

FirstSpear Friday Focus: General Purpose Pockets

Friday, August 21st, 2026

Every loadout has gear that doesn’t fit neatly into a magazine pocket or a radio pouch. The FirstSpear GENERAL PURPOSE POCKET family is built to handle exactly that, providing durable, modular storage solutions that mount cleanly to any 6/9™ or 6/12™ compatible platform and adapt to whatever the mission requires. Whether you are organizing medical supplies, tools, admin essentials, or mission-specific gear, the GP Pocket family gives you a purpose-built solution in three distinct configurations, each designed around a different capacity and use case.

Features

  • 6/9™ AND 6/12™ ATTACHMENT — MOLLE COMPATIBLE
  • THREE SIZE-SPECIFIC CONFIGURATIONS
  • DUAL ZIPPER AND G HOOK CLOSURE SYSTEMS
  • CORDURA MATERIAL CONSTRUCTION — LIGHTWEIGHT AND DURABLE

The Structured GP Pocket, Small is a compact, streamlined solution built for smaller items, featuring a dual zipper closure and a low-profile footprint that minimizes bulk on a tight loadout. The General Purpose Pocket, Medium is constructed from 500D Cordura material and features an elastic daisy chain on both interior sides, with an additional belt attachment option. The General Purpose Pocket, Large is a flat pocket measuring 7″ x 7″ x 2″ with a zippered mesh internal compartment, dual zipper and G Hook closure, and a button hole at the top for routing a hydration tube or communication wire. The General Purpose Pocket, Large is available in Black, Coyote, MultiCam, Foliage Green, and Ranger Green. The General Purpose Pocket, Medium is available in Black, Coyote, MultiCam, and Ranger Green. The General Purpose Pocket, Small is available in Black, Coyote, MultiCam, and Ranger Green.

Built for military personnel, law enforcement officers, and prepared professionals who demand reliable equipment, the FirstSpear General Purpose Pocket family delivers modular, mission-ready storage across three configurations to fit any loadout. FirstSpear is the premier source for cutting-edge tactical gear for military, law enforcement, and those who train. To request an estimate, visit First-Spear.com/Request-For-Estimate. For more information, visit First-Spear.com.

Department of War Confirms Modular Handgun System (MHS) is Safe and Reliable

Friday, August 21st, 2026

PICATINNY ARSENAL, NJ  –

Despite public speculation and online misinformation regarding the pistol’s safety, Project Manager Soldier Lethality (PM SL), the Department of War’s official lead for the Modular Handgun System (MHS), confirms that there has never been a mechanically-caused accidental discharge. All investigated incidents of alleged “uncommanded discharges” have been traced back to the trigger being pulled.

Rigorous Testing and Safety by Design

The MHS, comprised of the M17 (full-size) and M18 (compact) 9mm striker-fired pistols, is a thoroughly tested, safe, and reliable weapon system for the modern Warfighter. Since the first systems were fielded to the 101st Airborne Division in 2017, the MHS has replaced the legacy M9 and M11 pistols and is now in service with over 400,000 pistols across the U.S. Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy.

The MHS was designed with four internal safety mechanisms (primary sear notch, secondary sear notch, striker safety lock, and a disconnector safety mechanism) and features an external ambidextrous manual safety, bringing the total number of safety mechanisms to five.

Before fielding, the MHS underwent extensive Production Verification Testing, where over 200 pistols fired more than 1.5 million rounds. This testing regimen included evaluations for reliability, durability, accuracy, rough handling, drop safety, and performance in extreme environmental conditions. Early in this process, engineering changes were implemented to address and rectify all initial drop-test concerns, and these updates were applied to every  MHS pistol before it was fielded.

To ensure quality and safety during production, the government performs Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT) for each production lot. During LAT, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Quality Assurance Representatives (QARs) randomly selects a statistically significant number of samples from each production lot to undergo LAT. If any weapon fails LAT, the entire lot is rejected. All lots of weapons produced to date have passed LAT prior to being fielded to warfighters.

Investigating Field Incidents

When a potential uncommanded discharge is reported in the field, the Army follows a stringent investigation protocol to determine the cause. According to the Army Safety Management Information System 2.0 (ASMIS 2.0), reported firearms mishaps account for less than 0.006% of all MHS pistols issued.

When a report is filed within ASMIS, the weapon is promptly shipped to the contractor in the same configuration as it was when the incident occurred. Once the weapon arrives at the contractor’s facility, the Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Small/Medium Caliber Weapons Branch Chief is notified. DCMA will have the contractor open the box to verify the serial number.  After the serial number is verified, the weapon is escorted and secured under U.S. Government property control pending the investigator’s arrival. Once the investigator is present, the weapon is brought out of the property cage and the investigation begins.

The investigation process is meticulous:

  1. Visual inspection of the weapon in its current state
  2. Examination of the weapon to check all safeties, internal and external, are functioning correctly
  3. The weapon is taken into the range where it is functionally tested with live ammunition.  At least 1 (One) 21 round magazine is used to verify proper function of all safeties.
  4. After the range, the weapon is moved back to the armorer’s bench where the striker operation is thoroughly tested
  5. Finally, the weapon is broken down to each individual part to ensure all the parts look normal.
  6. After this, the weapon is cleaned and returned to the original unit.

To date, all investigated incidents of alleged “uncommanded discharges” have been traced back to the trigger being pulled, and not due to an issue with the firearm. Investigators have been unable to induce a discharge without disengaging the manual safety and pulling the trigger.

Joint Service Confidence

Most recently, a review of the MHS was initiated after the Air Force reported a potential “uncommanded discharge” involving the tragic loss of an Airman. As the lead for the MHS program, PM SL immediately engaged with our Air Force partners to assist in developing and implementing a Supplemental Inspection Criteria (SIC) as a precautionary action to investigate the incident and validate the weapon’s integrity.

The USAF’s SIC effort mandated a 100% inspection of the DAF’s “in-use” M18 inventory. It is confirmed that of the nearly 114,000 pistols inspected to date, none exhibited any conditions that could have led to an uncommanded discharge. 

PM SL is confident that the MHS pistol continues to meet and exceed that standard for the entire Joint Force. The DAF’s Director of Security Forces, Brig. Gen. Brian Filler, affirmed this, stating, “It can now be stated that the M18 is safe and reliable for DAF missions.”

By CPE Ground Army

The Army Azimuth

Thursday, August 20th, 2026

Since 1775, the United States Army has defended our republic and carried the torch of liberty through suffering and sacrifice. From the frozen Delaware at Trenton to the bluffs of Normandy, the jungles of Guadalcanal, and the winter hills of Chosin, American Soldiers faced enemies in brutal conditions and held the line. They answered the Nation’s call. One hundred and ninety campaign streamers fly from our Army flag, each testifying to the valor of our forebearers. Their legacy is ours to uphold.

Answering the Nation’s Call

The Army serves the Nation. We preserve peace and security, support our national objectives, and overcome any force whose aggression imperils us. Our strategic direction is clear:

  • Defend the Homeland. We secure our Nation’s borders, protect the American people against attack, and respond to domestic crises — these are our most sacred duties. A secure Western Hemisphere is a prerequisite for joint power projection.
  • Warfighting. America’s Army applies violence decisively on battlefields marked by unrelenting speed, precision lethality, and persistent observation. We dominate from the outset to control escalation, prevent prolonged war and counter enemies who employ stand-off weapons, including unmanned systems and WMD.
  • Project Power On and From the Land. The Army projects land power by generating combat credible formations, prepositioning capabilities where they matter most, and strengthening the capacity of our Allies and partners. The Army maintains units postured to respond immediately to crises and contingencies regionally and worldwide.

The Army is the Foundation of the Joint Force

The Army has aggressively pursued change to prepare for large scale combat operations. We shifted from brigade modularity to a force organized for multidomain operations at all echelons. We fielded long range precision fires that strike deep and sink ships at sea, evolved air defenses for skies saturated with unmanned systems, upgraded theater logistics, expanded terrestrial intelligence, and established new units integrating space, cyber, electronic warfare, and artificial intelligence into command and control.

The work of change continues. Today we emphasize the fundamentals of Soldiering, ensuring a strong grounding in warrior ethos, individual Soldier readiness, and small unit tactical skills. As the Army campaigns around the world, we turn our focus to operational readiness to achieve our central task: To be ready to fight and win the battles and wars of the Nation.

A ready Army is the foundation of the Joint Force, providing a range of capabilities that underpin joint operations and give our leaders immediate options. We employ four operational warfighting elements — convergence, strike, close battle, and endurance — to deliver joint all domain maneuver. We bind the regional land power networks of Allies and partners, offering distinct advantages for access and interoperability.

What Land Dominance Demands

U.S. Army forces must be prepared to overcome the most complex challenges our adversaries can impose and master an operational environment that looks fundamentally different from the battlefields of yesterday. To prepare for modern war, the Army will:

  • Embrace a Warrior Mindset. We possess the grit to endure hardship and the courage to act honorably. Our Soldiers and Civilians uphold high standards and seek continuous development. Leaders at all echelons see Soldiers as the decisive advantage and prioritize training mission essential tasks.
  • Outpace our Adversaries. We learn, innovate, and adapt faster by pairing our human ingenuity and judgment with advanced technologies like autonomy and artificial intelligence. Our professional military educational institutions teach the essence of warfighting, and our combat training centers validate readiness through crucibles designed to replicate the challenge of combat. Experience, reflection, and accountability propel our force to excellence.
  • Gain Positional Advantage. We gain positional advantage through posture that comes in many forms: from forward basing to campaigning to stockpiling supplies. We continually reinforce forward areas, harden lines of communication, and exploit opportunities.

The next war will not look like our last. Yet there are timeless truths in war. The battlefield does not forgive weakness. Land combat in the modern era will demand every ounce of rigor, endurance, and courage we possess. Every shortcut in training and lapse in discipline will be paid for in blood.

This is the Army we must be: disciplined, lethal, and relentless — an Army that closes with and destroys the enemy, leaving no doubt about the will and power of the United States. As it has for more than 251 years, our Army will stand ready to fight, and win — whenever and wherever the Nation calls.

This We’ll Defend!

Christopher C. LaNeve
40th Vice Chief of Staff
General, United States Army

KATUSA: 76 Years of “We Go Together”

Thursday, August 20th, 2026

August 15 is recognized as the birthday of the Korean Augmentation to the United States Army Soldier program, or KATUSA. The program was created only weeks after the Korean War ignited, and to this day KATUSAs continue to serve side-by-side with Eighth Army Soldiers providing priceless support and friendship.

The Korean War began June 25, 1950. Roughly three weeks later the KATUSA program was initiated July 15 by an informal agreement between the Honorable Syngman Rhee, president of the Republic of Korea, and General of the Army Douglas MacArthur, commander in chief, United Nations Command.

During the first two months of the war, the Republic of Korea Army had been destroyed as a fighting force and the U.S. Army was significantly understrength and had been “compressed” into the Pusan perimeter by North Korean forces, as described in an official Army report. Replacements and fighting men were in desperate need.

The concept of the KATUSA program was to augment the U.S. forces. In the beginning most KATUSAs were recruited directly off the streets of Pusan, now spelled Busan. After a basic training period, KATUSA Soldiers were sent to combat units serving as infantrymen. The first KATUSAs reached U.S. Army units by mid-August 1950.

They were issued U.S. supplies, but were paid by and remained administered under the Republic of Korea Army. Throughout the Korean War, up to a maximum of 23,000 KATUSAs served at any one time, according to the Army.

After the 1953 armistice, KATUSA Soldiers remained with U.S. Army units to receive training not readily available in the ROKA and to enhance U.S. Army in Korea’s mission capability.

Since 1950, the KATUSA Soldier Program has been ongoing with only periodic strength adjustments dictated by requirements. Originally, KATUSA Soldiers were returned to the ROKA after serving with the U.S. Army. Since 1968, however, KATUSA Soldiers remain with Eighth Army until their service commitments are completed. The ROKA Support Group was established May 11, 1965 at the request of the Eighth Army commander to administer the KATUSA Soldier program.

Today, young South Korean men planning to conduct their mandatory military service obligation can apply to become a KATUSA if they have a command of the English language and if positions are available.

Eighth Army has stated the KATUSA program increases the ROK-U.S. combined defense capability on the Korean peninsula. The program is also significant not only because of the military manpower and monetary savings that it provides to the U.S. Army, but also because it puts a face on the ROK-U.S. alliance and the combined commitment to deter war.

The KATUSA program is the very essence of one of Eighth Army’s favorite phrases, “katchi kapshida,” — “we go together.”

Information for this article provided by Eighth Army and these sources:

“Integration of ROK Soldiers into US Army Units (KATUSA)” (U.S. Army)

“The KATUSA Experiment” by David Curtis Skaggs (excerpt)

By Kenji Thuloweit

Why Bodi.Me’s Continuous R&D Is Critical to Your Business

Wednesday, August 19th, 2026

Recent blog post as seen on Bodi.Me

Continuous innovation is the heart and engine of Bodi.Me.

Fashion fit technology cannot stand still because bodies, garments, workforce demographics, regulations and business systems are constantly evolving. Continuous research and development keeps sizing technology relevant, accurate, scalable and commercially valuable.

When a business partners with Bodi.Me, it does not simply adopt Size-Me as a sizing solution. It gains a long-term technology and operational partner—and access to a specialist digital team with deep knowledge of body data, garment construction, fit, size demand and apparel supply chains.

More than a sizing solution

Successful innovation is not about adding technology for its own sake. It is about identifying the right technical solution for a real operational problem.

Bodi.Me listens closely to its customers’ challenges, including:

Excess stock in some sizes and shortages in others

High volumes of size-related returns and exchanges

Expensive emergency uniform re-orders

Limited visibility of future size demand

Complex international uniform programmes

Technology that is difficult to integrate or use

?We translate these challenges into cost-effective technical tools that can be implemented within existing e-commerce, ordering and uniform-management workflows.

Our Size-Me fashion fit technology works with only a few simple, non-intrusive wearer inputs. It does not require photographs or body scans during standard use.

Behind that simple experience lies more than a decade of extensive research. Bodi.Me continuously analyses, validates and enriches its proprietary body-data resources, with a growing knowledge base now representing nearly one million body profiles.

These expanding datasets are used to continually retrain, test and refine our machine-learning models. In parallel, we constantly improve and personalise the wearer journey while advancing our proprietary algorithms to address the specific fit requirements of different garments—including particularly complex, gender-neutral or non-standard garment collections.

The objective is clear: make advanced technology simple for the wearer, easy for the customer to implement and capable of generating measurable value through better production planning, stock allocation and size distribution.

Read the full installment here.