XC3 Weaponlight

Archive for the ‘Guest Post’ Category

Marine Corps Initiates Drone Task Force Summits to Accelerate UAS Lethality

Wednesday, September 24th, 2025

QUANTICO, Va. —

In August, the Marine Corps began hosting drone task force summits to chart a way forward for operational units across the Marine Corps to effectively employ small drones.

The drone task force leverages work done over the last several years by various units, including Marine Corps Special Operations Command, the infantry battalion experiment (IBX), and the Marine Corps Attack Drone Team (MCADT) to hone techniques for using small surveillance and lethal attack drones.

The purpose of the task force is to organize, train, and equip Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) elements to achieve proficiency in employing both lethal and non-lethal unmanned aerial systems at scale. Supporting this effort is the years-long development, testing, and fielding of existing organic precision fires systems to Marine infantry units.

The near-term goal is to enable the Marine infantry squad to achieve concentrated effects at operationally relevant distances, providing a decisive advantage in distributed operational environments. The Secretary of Defense’s “Unleashing U.S. Military Drone Dominance” memo will accelerate these efforts by paving the way for faster procurement pipelines to provide units the equipment and training they need to remain at the forefront of drone adaptation into the MAGTF.  

The drone task force is incorporating best practices and lessons learned from the Fleet Marine Forces with cost-effective solutions for operating first-person-view (FPV) drones. These solutions include advanced manufacturing techniques to build and repair drone components in austere, contested environments. The task force will allow the service to quickly address challenges the Fleet Marine Force faces and facilitate timely, cost-efficient solutions to enhance the lethality of all elements of the MAGTF.

Some efforts to accelerate the use of surveillance and weaponized drones to Marines are:

UAS/C-UAS integration handbook for best practices

Mature training programs to expand the number of experienced operators in the Fleet Marine Force

Updated Blue List systems for the service to purchase

Signature management training

Establishment of communities of interest across the Marine Corps

Integration of SUAS in future marksmanship competitions

Collaboration with the Defense Innovation Unit to purchase and distribute FPV and one-way attack drones.

Establishment of the Marine Corps Attack Drone Team to standardize tactics, techniques and procedures

Continued infrastructure improvements and maturation of training areas to accommodate the incorporation of drones into combined arms training and exercises.

Continued efforts to develop a common ecosystem and command and control architecture.

The Marine Corps Attack Drone Team, established in January 2025, by Training Command and the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, has driven greater understanding of lethal UAS opportunities and challenges for the Marine Corps. Based at Weapons Training Battalion, Quantico, the MCADT builds on the Marine Corps’ legacy of precision weapons expertise to advance another layer of lethality for infantry battalions and littoral combat teams. It addresses the rapid progression and proliferation of armed FPV drone technologies and aims to translate lessons from modern drone warfare into doctrine, training, and fleet integration.

Through agile experimentation, MCADT has made significant progress in accelerating the service’s adoption of armed FPV drones. The first kinetic live-fire FPV drone strike was conducted at Quantico on April 24, 2025, demonstrating real-world lethality at a fraction of traditional costs: less than $5,000 per strike compared to over $80,000 for current infantry battalion organic missiles. With effective ranges of up to 20 kilometers, these drones dramatically expand the reach of small-unit formations, far surpassing the 1–2 kilometer range of current systems available to rifle squads and platoons.

In parallel, MCADT partnered with the Marine Corps Tactics and Operations Group to draft the Corps’ first Armed Drone Employment Tactics Techniques and Procedures pamphlet, which will serve as the baseline training resource for squad certification beginning this fall. To further refine employment techniques and accelerate proficiency, the team also initiated the Service’s first Armed FPV Drone Employment Competitions, formalized in Marine Corps guidance earlier this year. These competitions will evolve into intermediate and advanced training venues modeled after the Competition-in-Arms Program, leveraging the same proven approach long used by the Marine Corps Shooting Team to refine tactics and weapon system design. The inaugural competition is scheduled for October 2025 at MCB Quantico, followed by events in INDOPACOM at Camp Hansen, Okinawa, in December, and MCB Hawaii in January 2026.

Under the drone task force’s governance, these ongoing experimental initiatives will continuously inform the concurrent service effort to fully field lethal drones at scale to a force that is organized, trained, and equipped for the modern battlefield.

By Lt. Col. Eric Flanagan | Marine Corps Combat Development Command

Drones 101: Welcome to DOW’s Joint Counter-Small UAS University

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2025

FORT SILL, Okla. — In the subtropical landscape of Fort Sill, those who are up early can often hear a constant buzzing coming from part of the installation. But it’s not their tinnitus acting up, or a swarm of killer bees. That low droning sound is likely coming from the Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems University.

The school is the War Department’s only joint training center aimed at countering the growing number of aerial threats against U.S. troops and coalition forces. It teaches Soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines how to operate drone equipment, plan counter-small UAS strategies and train others to defend their comrades from harm.

“Coming out of a long period of counterterrorism … we’ve really seen the proliferation of drones [that] we call small-UAS … at low altitudes that have speed and accuracy that we’ve never seen before,” explained Army Lt. Col. John Peterson, JCU director. “That alone has changed the landscape.”

The urgent need to understand how to counter these threats is obvious from the conflicts unfolding in Ukraine, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific region. Enemy drone tactics, techniques and procedures change almost daily, JCU officials said, leaving experts to constantly search for ways to update their defenses.

“Just understanding how easily these drones can be converted for malicious intent — that was something that was very surprising [to] me,” said Marine Corps 1st Lt. Jacob Ceglenski, JCU student.

Joint Counter-small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS) University Director U.S. Army Lt. Col. John Peterson and JCU Student U.S. Marine Corps 1st Lt. Jacob Ceglenski speak about the JCU at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, Aug. 20-21, 2025. DoW video by U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Madelyn Keech.

However, air defense is nothing new to the U.S. military. American short-range air defense has been dominant for decades, so despite the new threats that are persistently cropping up, it’s nothing the U.S. can’t handle.

“For our [counter-small] UAS battle drills, they’re really not any different than anything our air defenders have already been doing,” said Army Sgt. 1st Class Alan Buhl, JCU instructor. “Everyone else is just now learning entry-level air defense doctrine.”

“[We are] making sure that we’re sustaining the training for joint partners,” Peterson said. “That they have the understanding and they’re comfortable using the equipment that they’re being provided.”

Courses Cover Operation, Planning and Protection

The JCU couples lessons learned in the field with intelligence assessments and other capabilities to give deploying service members the knowledge they need to mitigate ever-changing threats. About 30 experts run the school, which offers three courses that can last from one to three weeks.

The operator’s course goes in-depth to teach service members, most of whom are enlisted, how to use counter-small UAS equipment and understand the technicalities. The planner’s course teaches officers and staff how to place and employ those assets. Those students gain an understanding of U.S. systems and enemy tactics, then develop defensive plans to protect critical capabilities and assets. The installation protection course teaches post leaders how to sharpen their defenses, including how to tell the difference between potential threats and benign hobbyists’ drones.

Each course starts in a joint classroom environment where students from all career fields learn the basics: the types of aircraft they may see downrange, where they come from, how to identify them, and how to employ passive air defense measures, such as aircraft shelters, camouflage to hide assets and dispersion to spread them out.

“Looking up in the air — the third dimension — is not a requirement for most jobs in the military. But now everyone — the infantrymen, the artillerymen, the logistician — all have to look up,” explained Army Maj. Dennis “Chip” Stanford, JCU executive officer and a career air defender. “People [have to] adopt the mindset that everything is being observed from multiple angles, and it’s realistically a transparent battlespace.”

After a few days, the classes are split into service-specific tracks. At the JCU’s training range, they’re taught how to operate and maintain various systems and pieces of equipment, depending on what their service uses downrange.

Students also gain an understanding of 24 types of commercial off-the-shelf UASs. Many are known as “blue air” drones, which are used by DOW during operations. Others, known as “red air” aircraft, are used by countries perceived as our enemies.

Air Force Capt. Sarah Dahlke, assigned to Air Forces Central Command Force Protection at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, took the planner’s course in August. Approaching the UAS problem from the intel side, Dahlke often monitors aerial threats from a desk, so it’s good for her to see all the various aircraft up close.

“It looks a lot different when you’re out here on the ground, especially when you’re talking about visually identifying things,” she said. “Working in intel, you see all the red [adversary threats], but you don’t really get into the intricacies of the blue side. So, for me, that’s been the most valuable thing.”

All of the students know how important the curriculum is to the current global environment.

“We need to learn, and we need to be able to train people, as well as have knowledgeable planners,” said Army Chief Warrant Officer 2 Jilliene Huffman, air and missile defense systems tactician assigned to the 82nd Airborne Division. “[The 82nd] did just stand up the 3rd Battalion, 4th Air Defense Regiment. They’re going to be one of the first air battalions under a division that has actual counter-UAS systems … which is why it’s important that I came here.”

The Threat Detection Systems

When it comes to students in the operator’s course, there are 15 fixed-site systems they may learn, each of which identifies, tracks and mitigates drone threats using a combination of components.

One of the main fixed-site systems students train on is the Fixed-Site Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aircraft Integrated Defeat System. It includes components to counter electromagnetic attacks, as well as ground-based radar and an electro-optical/infrared camera that can identify potential threats. The FS-LIDS can detect and even shoot down missiles, school officials said — a scenario students practice during simulations.

The simulations operate from trailers on the compound that mimic forward operating base command and control centers. Students learn the roles of each player in the room so they can understand the capabilities and limitations of every portion of the process, from the camera systems to the radar and the Forward Area Air Defense System.

“[FAADS] controls everything that’s supposed to happen … from shooting a rocket to electronic warfare,” explained Fred Hill, manager of the JCU operator’s course. “Everything the service member does — how he would do it downrange — he’s going to do it that exact way right here.”

While Army students heavily focus on FS-LIDS, the Navy and Air Force both use a fixed-site system known as a Counter-Remote Control Model Aircraft Integrated Air Defense Network. Other systems taught include the Negation of Improvised Non-State Joint Aerial system, used to counter small UASs; the Drone Restricted Access Using Known Electromagnetic Warfare system; and the Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node, a next-generation intelligence ground system.

The culmination of the classes is a joint exercise, during which all the students work together to counter a simulated threat.

JCU Staff: Going Above and Beyond

Before any students can be taught, the JCU staff has to get spun up on each piece of equipment, and commercial partners help with that. To repay the favor, instructors keep manufacturers in the loop on new technology they see on the battlefield so those drone builders can adapt, too.

Many of the staff go above and beyond their daily roles by doing all the flying, maintenance and aircraft development. For example, one staff member has created intricate manuals for each aircraft, while another works with 3D printers to create drones and replacement parts.

“The cost of [having] drones to shoot is unrealistic — at least $1,000 a pop. And when we’re talking 36 students a class, we can’t keep up with that cost,” explained JCU staff member Richard Stairs, who runs the compound’s 3D printing lab. “By using 3D printing, we minimalize that cost and basically cut it in half, based on what components we’re using.”

Peterson said it’s not a big team, but they are all passionate, adding, “The adaptation and innovation that they’ve been able to do on their own time … it’s remarkable what this team at the JCU is doing and will continue to do to help support the joint force.”

The JCU shares a lot of its products with DOW drone forces so they can develop their own capabilities in the future. The school also partners with federal agencies and academia and even trains foreign service members of partner militaries.

“Each country has a little bit of a different environment and theories behind [counter-small UAS strategy], so it helps give us a more well-rounded experience,” Peterson explained.

While drone warfare is perpetually changing, the school is determined to keep pace.

“We are constantly evolving — that’s with the new equipment, new threats and new student input that comes through,” said Jacob Cameron, JCU air boss. “No matter what the threat is, the JCU is adapting.”

The JCU, which became operational in 2023, falls under the Army’s 30th Air Defense Artillery Brigade. Fort Sill is home to the Army Field Artillery School, the Army Air Defense Artillery School, the 75th Fires Brigade and the 31st Air Defense Artillery Brigade, all of which have nurtured counter-small UAS strategies since the threat first surfaced.

By Katie Lange, Pentagon News

Army’s Principal Cyber Advisor Says Cyber Key to Preparing for Future Fight

Monday, September 22nd, 2025

WASHINGTON — Cyber is central to the Army’s once-in-a-generation transformation and to defending the homeland’s critical infrastructure, said Principal Cyber Advisor to the Secretary of the Army Brandon Pugh to attendees at the Billington CyberSecurity Summit, Sept. 11.

Pugh said the Army’s Continuous Transformation aims to put the right technology in Soldiers’ hands faster while strengthening readiness for the future battlefield — where cybersecurity underpins everything from base operations to mobilization.

“This is our effort to make sure the Army is adapting to the future battlefield,” Pugh said. “Cyber is a key component of Army Continuous Transformation.”

Pugh participated in “The Future of Cyber Threat” panel, moderated by Chris Townsend, an Elastic vice president. Alongside Pugh were Col. Ivan Kalabashkin, Deputy Head of Ukraine’s Security Services Cyber Division; Vikram Thakur, Technical Director at Broadcom; and Josh Salmanson, Vice President for the Defense Cyber Practice at Leidos. Panelists discussed a range of cyber-related issues.

People first

“People are the core of the Army,” Pugh said, noting that modernization efforts revolve around Soldiers and Army civilians who defend the nation every day. He highlighted opportunities to better harness the skills of Army National Guard and Army Reserve cyber professionals — many of whom work in cybersecurity in their civilian careers. “Who is better positioned to defend a critical infrastructure threat than the people who live there?” he asked.

Protecting critical infrastructure at home

Pugh emphasized that defending the homeland is a top priority, and that the Army has a direct stake because vulnerabilities in privately owned critical infrastructure — from power grids to transportation networks — can affect Army installations and unit mobilization. He pointed to assessments by the Army Cyber Institute at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point that examine how infrastructure weaknesses could disrupt the Army’s ability to project forces in crisis or conflict. “We need to be able to mobilize forces and equipment at a moment’s notice,” he said.

When asked how to address critical infrastructure vulnerabilities, Salmanson urged organizations to “get back to the basics” — patching systems, reducing vulnerabilities and avoiding shared passwords — to cut noise in networks and improve response to new threats. “We’re seeing higher volumes and better quality [attacks] consistently,” he said.

AI for cyber — at scale

Panelists agreed adversaries are already using artificial intelligence to increase the speed and quality of attacks. Kalabashkin said Ukraine has faced more than 13,000 cyberattacks on government and critical infrastructure systems since the start of the full-scale war, with Russia using AI in recent months to scan for network vulnerabilities.

Pugh said the Army is leaning into AI where it can provide a decisive edge. “How can AI be used more effectively and at scale for defensive cyber operations and perhaps even offensive cyber operations?” he asked, noting strong work already underway across Army Cyber Command and U.S. Cyber Command. “We should leverage AI to gain the upper hand — a force multiplier for our Soldiers.”

Speed to capability

Pugh said the Army is working to shorten timelines to field cyber capabilities, particularly from innovative companies with niche solutions. “If you have a unique capability that can add value to the military, there should be an ability to get that in the hands of a warfighter and test it in weeks,” he said. That effort, he added, aligns with the Army’s broader push to transform how it acquires, tests and fields technology.

By MAJ Sean M. Minton

Beyond the Strategic Corporal: 9th Communication Battalion Extends Gen Krulak’s Vision to Information Domain

Sunday, September 21st, 2025

“Attention in the COC!”

The gentle ripple of hushed conversation and rustling papers in the expeditionary command operation center completely subsided in response to the watch chief’s baritone voice. Heads snapped from computer monitors to the sound of his voice, and pens scrawled shorthand notes, recording his description of enemy signal interference.

After receiving the report, corporals and sergeants of the 9th Communication Battalion’s newly established intelligence department swiftly analyzed it and initiated an assessment that would be routed to the operations officer. The report indicated interference from an adversary’s nearby electronic warfare training exercise. The Marines sprang into action and applied pre-coordinated frequency protocols, maintaining the integrity of their communications and preventing their location from being revealed, thus preserving the mission.

This fictional scenario highlights a different kind of challenge Marines face today: not one of firepower or physical maneuver, but of connectivity and communication in a contested information environment, which is increasingly characterized by jamming, malware, and cyberattacks. These attacks, which have become a growing concern of military planners throughout the world, threaten communications and can lead to the isolation of forward elements. Marine tacticians say the potentially high tempo and wide range of simultaneous attacks in the information environment require decentralization of information operations.

As part of this transition to decentralization, the battalion, based at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, stood up an intelligence staff section in July 2025. The creation of the intelligence section makes the battalion more tactically responsive to threats in the information environment. The intelligence section now proactively monitors the electromagnetic spectrum for potential interference, analyzes adversary abilities related to electronic warfare and cyberattacks, develops threat assessments tailored to communication assets, and provides real-time intelligence updates to commanders and subordinate units. This is a significant shift from the past, when Marine Corps communication battalions relied upon Marine Corps Forces Cyberspace Command (MARFORCYBER) to fulfill these functions.

“Historically it was very reactive,” stated Capt. Brock Turner, the company commander of 9th Communication Battalion. “A malicious actor would attempt to gain access to our networks, and we would then receive feedback from MARFORCYBER. Now we are putting in measures to ensure that we strengthen posture based upon examination of adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures.”

2nd Lieutenant Aaron Hern, an intelligence officer with 9th Communication Battalion, I Marine Expeditionary Force Information Group, explained the reason for the change.

“Our integration into the battalion is crucial in supporting the Battalion Commander’s decision-making in support of all domain operations, with impacts on communication units of action,” he said. “My signal intelligence capabilities of signature management and electronic warfare aid the planning process and employment of communications capabilities.”

The decentralization of information warfare follows a precedent set by U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Charles C. Krulak, the 31st commandant of the Marine Corps, who emphasized the importance of small unit leadership through his conceptualization of the “Strategic Corporal,” a noncommissioned officer whose tactical decisions on a three-block battlefield could have strategic, international consequences. Krulak understood and embraced the possibility of junior leaders being isolated in geographically dispersed locations and having to make important, time-sensitive decisions on the spot. His philosophy placed confidence in junior leaders to do so and emphasized tough training to prepare them for the task.

Krulak articulated his vision in “The Strategic Corporal: Leadership in the Three-Block War”, which appeared in the January 1999 edition of Marines Magazine. Although his article, which was written while the internet was still emerging, focuses on war on land and in the air rather than in the information environment, the information warriors of 9th Communication Battalion say it’s just as applicable to information operations today.

“We are directly supporting leadership decision making cycles by providing intelligence reporting,” said Sgt. Gabriel Tuazon, an intelligence specialist with 9th Communication Battalion.

During a training exercise at Camp Pendleton in August 2025, 9th Communication Battalion incorporated its new intelligence capability into the task of establishing and maintaining communications while dealing with a variety of notional threats to their networks. The training exercise provided a realistic environment for Marines to hone the skills necessary to identify threats and develop innovative solutions to overcome adversary actions.

Cpl. Tobias Laskowski, a transmission system operator with 9th Communication Battalion, provided a general description of the battalion’s activity during the exercise. He explained that this exercise provided an opportunity for the Marines to train on less familiar radio waveforms, which allows for communication to continue in the event of enemy disruption to primary channels.

“When the enemy uses their electronic warfare assets to jam us and disrupt our communication, we can keep communicating with whatever echelon we need to talk to,” Laskowski said.

Tuazon said the battalion 9th Communication Battalion is adapting to the new challenges of a rapidly changing battlespace by embracing a decentralized approach and empowering Marines to operate as strategic corporals. He envisions broad application of the information warfare tactics now being employed at the battalion.

“I definitely see this integration model being a standard across the Marine Corps as other communication battalion S-2s (intelligence sections) can support their operations,” said Tuazon.

Story by Sgt Sean Potter    

I MEF Information Group

Lethality, Innovation, and Transformation Through AI Education at the U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies

Sunday, September 21st, 2025

THE ARMY UNIVERSITY, FORT LEAVENWORTH, Kansas – In late July 2025, the Advanced Military Studies Program at the School of Advanced Military Studies, known as SAMS, launched its first-ever experimental, three-day, Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence module.

The mission was simple: transform the program with an innovative, hands-on AI learning experience for students and faculty. The purpose was to enable warfighter lethality through AI education and training.

“AI is changing the character of warfare. Our graduates have got to be ready to lead formations powered by AI—and that’s why we did something about it,” Col. Dwight Domengeaux, Director, SAMS said.

Dr. Bruce Stanley, Director, AMSP, envisioned a module that pushed institutional norms about how mid-career officers learn about AI and learn with AI.

“Did we accept risk? Yes. We did—to create a critical learning opportunity for our students,” Stanley remarked. “We knew what was at stake, and we trusted our faculty and students to make it work.”

And make it work they did.

According to AMSP faculty, the module’s experimental instructional design was key, consisting of ten-and-a-half hours of total classroom contact time divided over three lessons.

“We covered a lot of ground with our students in three days,” Dr. Jacob Mauslein, associate professor, AMSP, said. “Subjects ranged from AI theory and ethical considerations of AI, to applying AI tools, and leading AI-enabled organizations.”

A novel feature of the module was that it was developed by AMSP students. As a task in their Future Operational Environment course, six students from the Class of 2025, mentored by two faculty, developed the AI module that would be taught to the Class of 2026. The students’ final draft was adopted almost without change by the faculty.

“Incorporating students as full participants in the process allowed us to co-develop lesson objectives and materials that deeply mattered to them,” Dr. Luke Herrington, one of the faculty leads for the module shared.

Meeting students where they were in terms of their AI skills and then taking them to the next level was part of the academic approach for the AI module, Herrington explained.

Maj. Justin Webb, PhD, an AY 2025 AMSP student, and one of the module’s developers explained it this way: “SAMS is a warfighting school—so we chose learning activities that would help us become more lethal warfighters with AI. Using AI tools like CamoGPT, Ask Sage, and others for several hours over three days helped us get there.”

Some students in the AY 2026 class were initially skeptical of using AI.

“At first, I didn’t know what I didn’t know,” Army Maj. Stuart Allgood, an Armor officer SAMS student said. “But by the end of the first day my thinking about AI had changed. After the second day, I could use AI tools I had never even heard of.”

Maj. Callum Knight, an intelligence officer from the United Kingdom summed up his experience.

“Before this course I viewed AI as just a data point,” Knight said. “Now that I’ve experienced what’s possible with AI, I realize it’s an imperative that is going to impact everything I do going forward.”

So, what’s next for AI at SAMS?

“Based on what our students got out of this, we intend to add more AI learning moments across the program,” Stanley said. “The priority now is to integrate AI into our upcoming operational warfare practical exercise.”

AMSP is one of the three distinct academic programs within SAMS.

The other two SAMS programs are the Advanced Strategic Leadership Studies Program or ASLSP – a Senior Service College equivalent, and, the Advanced Strategic Planning and Policy Program or ASP3 also known as the Goodpaster Scholars—a post-graduate degree program.

Matthew Yandura is an AMSP assistant professor, and retired Army colonel.

By Matt Yandura, Assistant Professor, School of Advanced Military Studies

US Army Retires Two Most Distinguished Aerial Intelligence Platforms

Saturday, September 20th, 2025

CAMP HUMPHREYS, Korea — The 501st Military Intelligence Brigade-Theater (MIB-T) observed the closure of the U.S. Army’s two most distinguished aerial intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) legacies, GUARDRAIL and Airborne Reconnaissance Low (ARL) during events, July 30-31, 2025.

In an event designated Operation PACIFIC SUNSET, the 501st MIB-T hosted a commemorative ceremony at the Desidario Army Airfield that featured a final flight of the aerial platforms, exhibition flights, and a runway display of aircraft. Soldiers of the Republic of Korea concluded the ceremony with a dedication honoring the contributions of the 3rd Military Intelligence (MI) Battalion, ARL, and GUARDRAIL Common Sensor (GRCS).

Since 1975, GUARDRAIL has provided indications and warnings to United States Forces Korea. Throughout its operational history, GUARDRAIL monitored the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) through a series of diplomatic crises on the peninsula. In 1988, under the 3rd MI Battalion, the first version of GRCS entered service, ensuring foreknowledge of any aggressive actions across the DMZ for many years to come.

“[GUARDRAIL] is our longest serving U.S. Army ISR asset in the [Korean Theater of Operations], and our only true [program of record] aircraft,” said Lt. Col. Derrick J. Zantt, commander of the 3rd MI Battalion.

At the program’s high point, GUARDRAIL aircraft and ground stations became standard, serving in six aerial MI battalions. Each iteration, at its debut, was on the cutting edge of technology.

By the 1990s, the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) had gained considerable experience in the development and fielding of special electronic mission aircraft. ARL emerged out of a shift in national priorities toward counterdrug smuggling, primarily out of the Andean Ridge region of South America. Originally a quick reaction capability, ARL was developed to satisfy low intensity multi-intelligence requirements in U.S. Southern Command and quickly proved its worth.

When the Army decided to retire the OV-1D Mohawks, the service looked to DoD and Congress for a solution.

“JSTARS couldn’t do it. The Air Force U-2 couldn’t do it. Even satellites couldn’t do it,” said Dr. Thomas Hauser, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security (INSCOM) historian and author of the INSCOM aviation book series. “INSCOM came through at the last minute with a solution: the versatile ARL. Their ever-watchful eyes stayed open all these years. It was always on the flightline or in the air, ready to serve the Army.”

During five decades of service, GUARDRAIL and ARL flew over 120,000 hours of support, over 30,000 sorties, and were flown by more than 800 military pilots through the 3rd MI Battalion over the life of the systems.

The final flights of these aerial intelligence platforms come as the Army transitions to more modern and lethal assets.

“Through the end of [its] life, the aircraft continued [its] operational collection mission until the last day and were able to effect a seamless handoff to the ATHENA program, which is serving as our bridge,” said Col. Brian Tinklepaugh, 501st MI Brigade-Theater commander.

The Army Theater-level High-altitude Expeditionary Next Airborne (ATHENA) platform combines multiple intelligence disciplines into a singular platform, enabling the Army to have a multi-intelligence approach to targets where the Army can use geospatial intelligence, signals intelligence, and electronic intelligence to look at a single target and better define that target for operational commanders.

“These bridge aircraft will continue to inform HADES programmatic requirements, facilitate early implementation of new training concepts and fielding strategies, and ultimately ensure “No Cold Starts” for the HADES program,” said Jordan Rubin, chief, INSCOM G3 ISR Operations.

The Army’s shift to the High Accuracy Detection and Exploitation System (HADES) marks a pivotal step in the future of aerial intelligence. HADES is a crewed aerial multi-intelligence collection system optimized for active campaigning in areas where range, speed, and data convergence are critical to rapidly gain and maintain situational understanding, freedom of maneuver, overmatch, and decision advantage in multi-domain operations. The system will employ on-board data processing using artificial intelligence and machine learning and will provide sensor-to-shooter links to shorten the kill chain to operate at the tempo and volume of high-intensity conflict.

HADES replaces legacy platforms such as GUARDRAIL and ARL and gives commanders the ability to see deeper, decide faster, and strike more effectively across multiple domains. As large-scale combat operations grow more complex, HADES and other strategic aerial assets will be central to ensuring U.S. forces maintain overmatch and decision advantage on the battlefield.

“As we move forward to the Army’s aerial future with HADES, I’m incredibly proud of not just the [legacy] aircraft, but the men and women who have flown the aircraft, maintained the aircraft, and who have provided that intelligence watch over more than five decades,” said Tinklepaugh.

By Erin Rohn

Wired for War: Drones, Real-World Lessons, and Future Frontiers

Friday, September 19th, 2025

Oak Grove Technologies is pleased to announce an exclusive event, Wired for War: Drones, Real-World Lessons, and Future Frontiers hosted at our Test & Training Center (T&TC) near Fort Bragg, NC. This symposium brings together active-duty military personnel and select invited vendors to explore cutting-edge drone technologies, real-world battlefield lessons, and the future of unmanned systems.

Date: Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Tome: 1230 – 1700

Location: OGT Test & Training Center

158 Rushing Rd.

Hoffman, NC 28347

Details:

• Live and simulated demonstrations showcasing innovative unmanned systems technologies

• A dial-in briefing from the front lines in Ukraine

• Industry and government panel discussion

• Networking opportunities with government, military, and industry leaders

Please Note: Attendance is limited to Government personnel and invited vendors only.

More details and registration information to follow, but for now please mark your calendars!

The Agilite Rear Hanger Pouch is LIVE

Friday, September 19th, 2025

Agilite has just released the patent-pending Rear Hanger Pouch that unlocks the rear of a plate carrier for accessible storage.

The space below a plate carrier has never really been utilized because it was both hard to access and impossible to return gear to without assistance. The Rear Hanger solves this issue making it a great solution for medical gear, warm clothing, extra ammunition or other gear. 

See how it works at agilitegear.com/products/rear-hanger

It is also available in a Berry Compliant version, for Government sales contact govsales@agilitegear.com.