Colt

Archive for the ‘Guest Post’ Category

Buyer Beware – Fake Phokus Research Website

Sunday, July 12th, 2026

A fraudulent website is impersonating Phokus Research Group and selling fake versions of our products under our name, using our images and product listings.

It is NOT affiliated with us and is NOT an authorized seller.

Our ONLY official store is phokusresearch.com

If you see steep “discounts” or offers that seem too good to be true on any other site claiming to be Phokus, do not enter your payment information.

Please report and share to protect our community.

Questions? Contact us directly at phokusresearch.com/contact.

From Code to Combat: Celebrating the Legacy of the Army Software Engineering Center and the Dawn of the Army Software & Innovation Center

Sunday, July 12th, 2026

For more than four decades, the U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command Software Engineering Center has been a cornerstone of the Army’s technological advantage. Now marking a new era of service, the center has embarked on an exciting new chapter, adopting a new name that reflects its ongoing mission and future direction?the Army Software & Innovation Center. Building on its support?center origins, CECOM ASIC now plays a central role in giving American Soldiers a decisive edge on the digital battlefield.

The Early Days: A Foundation in a Hardware World

Throughout its history, the Army’s software offices demonstrated the ability to adapt and evolve in a constantly changing environment. The SEC’s story began in 1983 with the establishment of the Software Development and Support Center at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, created to centralize software management for the Army’s Battlefield Automated Systems. In these early years, the world ran on hardware. Software, while important, was not yet the pivotal force it is today.

The center’s creation was driven by the need to support massive, hardware-based programs that required extensive, coordinated software engineering. Early large-scale initiatives highlighted growing software demands, particularly the Tactical Fire system for automating truck-based artillery fire and the Joint Tactical Communications program for digitizing tri-service communications. These were followed by programs like?Mobile Subscriber Equipment, a multi-billion-dollar initiative that underscored the critical need for a dedicated organization to manage the complex software lifecycle.

“In the 1990s, software did not drive systems the way it does today,” Jennifer Swanson, who began her career as an SEC intern in 1992 and later served as its Director from 2017 to 2022, said. “It was a hardware-focused environment where development cycles stretched for years. Now, the only way to evolve on the battlefield is through software that can be updated daily, if needed. That is a very different need.”

Despite this, the center, under various names, quickly proved its value. It played a key role in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, earning the prestigious Association of Old Crows award for its electronic warfare support. In 1991, it became the first Army Materiel Command group to earn a Capability Maturity Model Level 3 certification, a significant achievement that underscored its advanced software capabilities at the time.

A Shifting Battlefield: Dominance Through Digital Agility

A major shift in 1996 consolidated Army software operations under CECOM SEC, boosting efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The SEC became a microcosm of CECOM from a software perspective, handling everything from research and development to project management and logistics. “They were responsible for full life-cycle efforts … they did it all, for every system, from a software perspective,” Ed Thomas, former Director from 2000-2007, said. “The SEC was such a unique organization … a rare combination of engineering, development, and operational capabilities, with the ability to go forward. Not many organizations have that lifecycle capability.” Thomas said. This comprehensive role was vital as the SEC led Y2K readiness efforts to ensure the uninterrupted operation of critical Army systems.

In 2008, the SEC relocated its headquarters to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. The move shifted its mission from Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, due to the Base Realignment and Closure Commission. The SEC provided life-cycle software products and services for a broad range of Army and Joint systems, including avionics, communications, logistics, and intelligence. The center’s work ensures warfighters have the advanced tools needed to succeed in any environment.

“The organization is not stagnant; it actively moves to where the Army is going,” Stephen Kovacs, former SEC Acting Director from 2007 to 2008, said. This ethos guided the SEC through decades of rapid modernization.

Key accomplishments during this era include:

Revolutionized Aircraft and Ground Protection: During the Gulf War, the SEC’s Army Reprogramming Analysis Team completely revamped the process for updating aircraft software that protects against surface-to-air threats. This overhaul reduced the reprogramming turnaround time from several weeks to 24-48 hours, providing a lifesaving, rapid-response capability. This process was later applied to ground-based systems, such as the Counter Remote-Controlled Improvised Explosive Device Electronic Warfare?Duke system. 

Delivered Critical Infrared Countermeasures: When Army helicopters were attacked by shoulder-fired missiles in Iraq, the SEC delivered critical software updates to enable infrared countermeasures. These software systems enabled aircraft to automatically deploy evasive countermeasures, directly protecting aircrews in combat. 

Received Commendation for Y2K Efforts: The SEC’s work on over 165 battlespace systems was so successful that it earned a Letter of Commendation from the Army Chief Information Officer/G6, Lt. Gen. William Campbell. 

Pioneered Acquisition Efficiency: In the early 2000s, the center developed a new acquisition strategy by consolidating over 50 individual software support contracts into two large omnibus contracts called Software Support and Engineering Support. This innovative approach eliminated duplication, reduced contract management overhead, and improved overall support for soldiers. 

Logistics Modernization Program:?The center was integral to the initial deployment of LMP, a massive undertaking to modernize the Army’s supply chain. Based on its foundational success and deep expertise, the SEC was then tasked with establishing the Army Shared Services Center, a new organization designed to provide permanent, dedicated software support for the LMP system and its users. 

Intelligence & Electronic Warfare Support: During Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, the SEC executed a mission-critical software overhaul of the Guardrail intelligence software. The system was originally designed for a conventional battlefield and to look across a defined front line from friendly territory. To meet the demands of asymmetric warfare, the center’s engineers re-architected the software, enabling the platform to conduct 360-degree surveillance. This fundamental transformation allowed Guardrail to continue its vital intelligence-gathering mission in a new operational environment without traditional battle lines. 

Received the Army Superior Unit Award: The SEC earned the prestigious Army Superior Unit Award for its performance of providing software sustainment and technical support to the Army during the 2007 calendar year. 

Centralized and Enhanced Field Support: The SEC fused all its forward-deployed personnel—including field support engineers, help desks, and call centers—into a single organization with a direct reporting line to its headquarters. This restructuring significantly improved operational performance and efficiency, leading to the transfer of the Digital System Engineer mission from Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications-Tactical’s Technical Support Facility to the SEC. 

The Modern Era: Forging the Army’s Tech Company

By the 2010s, the strategic importance of software in military operations had become paramount. The ability to update systems on the fly was essential for battlefield evolution, and cybersecurity had never been more critical. The organization’s focus shifted to modernization to meet these new demands.

Field Support & Continuous Delivery:?The SEC placed Software Readiness Officers with every active Army division and corps. These officers provided on-the-ground technical support. They ensured that software delivered through the modern repository is effective and user-friendly in real-world conditions. 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: The center developed and deployed AI Flow, a secure, Army-owned generative AI platform. It automates and accelerates tasks for users across the Army. Work that once took days or weeks can now be accomplished in minutes. 

Joint Service Collaboration: The center’s Army Reprogramming Analysis Team started a working group with the Navy and Air Force. This group shares threat analysis software, reduces redundant work, and enables faster responses to new and evolving enemy capabilities. 

Cybersecurity and Zero Trust Architecture:?The SEC took a leading role in policy development for the Army’s Zero Trust cybersecurity framework, a crucial initiative to protect the service’s data and networks from advanced cyber threats by adhering to a “never trust, always verify” principle. 

Army Food Management Information System: The SEC modernized the Army’s web-based food service platform, which oversees operations for more than 800 dining facilities globally. The center developed custom Application Programming Interfaces to connect the legacy system to modern platforms, successfully enabling advanced data analytics, automated supply ordering, and convenient CAC meal purchases. 

This evolution was put to the ultimate test by global events. When Russia first invaded Ukraine, the organization’s agility and readiness were paramount. The SEC deployed a team to Germany to operationalize all Joint Battle Command Platform systems, ensuring full mission support capability.

The Heart of the Mission: People, Culture, and Leadership

Throughout its history, the SEC’s greatest asset has been its people. The organization has long been recognized for a culture that fosters growth and builds leaders from within.

“It is a family-type organization where everyone tries to look out for each other,” Kovacs said, adding that a guiding principle was always, “You can do no wrong by doing the right thing.”

This environment was crucial for talent development. The Software Engineering Intern Program has been a cornerstone for decades, bringing in new engineers and providing them with hands-on experience and advanced education.

“I am grateful I had the opportunity to grow as a leader at a place like SEC,” Swanson said. “It allowed me to learn. We all make mistakes, but I never felt a mistake was something I was going to get punished for. That helps you become a more confident leader.”

This practice of “leaders building leaders” created a foundation of trust and empowerment that remains central to the organization’s success, a success recognized with the prestigious Army Superior Unit Award.

The Future is Now

Today, as CECOM ASIC, the organization is the Army’s premier tech hub. Software has never been more important to the Army and CECOM ASIC is its tech company. There are many skilled professionals at the forefront of delivering cutting-edge solutions in AI, cybersecurity, and data analytics.

“We are incredibly proud of our history, because those decades of experience serve as the launchpad for what comes next,”?Garrett Shoemaker, Director of CECOM ASIC, said.?”Software is the foundation of the modern battlefield, and CECOM ASIC is drawing on that legacy to lead this future transformation for the Army as a whole. We are paving the way forward, ensuring our Soldiers have the agile, innovative digital capabilities they need to dominate tomorrow’s fight.”

From its origins as a small support directorate to its current role as a center of innovation, CECOM ASIC’s 40-year journey is a story of evolution. Its unwavering dedication to the mission and its ability to adapt and lead in a constantly changing technological landscape will continue to shape the future of warfare.

By SCOTT HOCHENBERG

Exercises Put Army’s Newest Multi-Domain Formation to the Test

Sunday, July 12th, 2026

FORT BLISS, Texas — When it comes to defending the vast Pacific Ocean, the Army is usually going to take a back seat to the Navy, at least until the fight hits land. But in an effort to increase its advantage in the Joint fight in the Pacific, the Army has created the 7th Infantry Division Multi-Domain Command-Pacific.

Two exercises in June, Pacific Fury and Valiant Shield, in the U.S. Pacific Command area of operations has allowed the U.S. Army Futures and Concepts Command and two assessment teams from the U.S. Army Joint Modernization Command to look at the 7ID MDC-PAC and joint integration and capability improvements as they relate to the defense of Guam and other island chains in the Pacific.

The Army established 7ID MDC-PAC as a two-star operational headquarters out of Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, and reached full operational capacity in mid-June. It merges the 7th Infantry Division and the 1st Multi-Domain Task Force to synchronize space, cyber, electronic warfare and precision fires efforts across the Indo-Pacific. The new formation brings capabilities, sensors and effects that will help the joint fight in the Pacific, according to Maj. Caleb Bloom, assessment planner in JMC’s Operations Group A.

“In the Pacific, the Army is never going to be the main effort until we hit mainland on potential conflict,” Bloom said. “However, there are things the Army can do to support the joint fight, and the MDC-PAC brings a lot of sensors and effects that will allow success at an operational strategic level. The formation is really aimed at how the Army can support the Joint fight by providing kinetic and non-kinetic effects and sensors.”

The criticality of 7ID MDC-PAC’s mission and its contributions to the joint force is what drove JMC to send a robust team to JBLM to assess developing concepts and capabilities as part of Pacific Fury, said Col. Joseph Mukes, chief of JMC’s Operations Group A.

“Our partnership with 7ID MDC-PAC here in Pacific Fury and in future exercises will afford the Army a great opportunity to learn from an elite formation as they progress,” Mukes said. “We expect to glean new and innovative ways the Army will contribute to the Joint Force as they provide protection and stability to the Pacific. We also look forward to our partnership with MDC-Europe, where we also expect to learn great deal under a very different operational and strategic problem set.”

One of the benefits JMC experimentation experts bring to exercises like Pacific Fury and Valiant Shield is the ability to give units and commands an external view of their capabilities and progress, shared Maj. Kyle Shea, lead planner for JMC’s participation in Valiant Shield. JMC assessors bring the knowledge of how other units are operating and taking advantage of new capabilities, so they can provide some real comparisons beyond, “Yeah, that works well.”

“The main thing we bring that the participating units don’t have is the assessors, the subject matter experts, who can give them an external look,” Shea said. “It’s easy for units to say, ‘We participated, check the block; We did the thing.’ To get an outside perspective to look at you and say, ‘You know what, here are your strengths; But, also, here’s where we see some opportunity for improvements.’ Yes, this capability works really well, but we see other capabilities and other exercises constantly, so how does it measure up against those others? We can give the outside perspective that the units may have a tougher time seeing. We’re just looking at it from a little different perspective.”

For Valiant Shield, JMC will have teams in Guam, Hawaii and JBLM. Lt. Col. Zachary Quintana, the assessments team lead for JMC’s Operations Group A, said the teams will be looking for progress in how the joint team defends the U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility.

“We’ll be looking for improvement in the integration of the Joint kill web; the best sensor, best shooter methodology, in a defense of Guam scenario,” Quintana said. “We are looking at the Air Force, Navy, Army, how we all work together to address the same problem: closing any sensor-to-shooter gaps that USARPAC and USPACOM are trying to address in their [area of responsibility].”

Participating in exercises in the Pacific offers the chance to work naturally with our joint and coalition partners, Shea said.

“This has the advantage of being an USPACOM-driven exercise, so participation of our joint and coalition partners is inherently already there,” Shea said. “We’re not pulling people to the table to participate, they’re already there, so it makes for easier opportunities to see our Army capabilities integrated into the joint force and into that joint kill web.”

Shea noted that Project Convergence Capstone 5 started this chain of persistent experimentation that will continue through Pacific Fury and Valiant Shield and into Project Convergence-Capstone 6 in July in California.

“We gained a lot of insight into Joint integration in the defense of the Pacific during Capstone 5, and this will be a continuation of that progress,” Shea said. “What does it look like as they introduce new capabilities and continue to refine their processes? What’s awesome about it is it’s a Joint capability. They have the Aegis Combat System integrated from the Navy. The Air Force is involved because the defensive counter-air fight is part of that.

“Seeing that progress is both a material improvement, where they’re introducing new capabilities, but also a system improvement in how they integrate them, how the systems interact and overlap,” Shea said. “They all have semi-proprietary systems for how they target and what radar capabilities can be used with what effectors, so getting them to work more seamlessly together and be integrated in a continuous layered defense system is what they’re working toward. You can see that improvement happening in real time as we assess them year over year.”

As the teams return from Pacific Fury and Valiant Shield, FCC will turn its focus to PC-C6, using the insights gathered to feed into the broader framework of persistent experimentation. In that way, both experimentation and readiness work hand-in-hand to improve today’s Army as well as the future force.

By Jonathan Koester

Dressed to Survive: How an Army Decision Aid Is Improving Cold-Weather Readiness

Saturday, July 11th, 2026

NATICK SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER, Mass. – Where there is little rest, comfort, or compromise in the world’s most austere cold-weather environments, a soldier’s clothing is more than just a uniform – it is survival. For leaders, clothing decisions are tactical decisions, and the Medical Research and Development Command’s U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine’s Cold Weather Ensemble Decision Aid – CoWEDA – is giving them the information to make the right ones.

Developed by biophysical mathematical modeler Dr. Xiaojiang Xu, CoWEDA is a research-backed decision aid designed to take the guesswork out of a leader’s most critical pre-mission decisions. By accounting for environmental conditions, physical activity levels, and clothing ensembles, CoWEDA gives leaders the data they need to make informed and confident decisions about what their soldiers’ clothing needs are before stepping into the field. The Air Force recognized that need more than 10 years ago when approaching Xu and USARIEM looking for their expertise to a simple but critical question — what types of clothing do Airmen need when operating, maintaining, or jumping from aircrafts in extreme cold weather conditions?

“Ultimately, the question became, is this specific clothing suitable for minus 50 degrees Fahrenheit? We realized there was no reliable method to answer that question,” said Dr. Xiaojiang Xu, a USARIEM biophysical mathematical modeler. “The only available method was to provide a single insulation number, such as if you go to minus 50 degrees, you need a clothing value of five, but for the average user, that number means very little in terms of actual injury prevention. It was at that point we began designing a new method. With CoWEDA, the standard compares gear performance directly against the risk of hypothermia and frostbite, making it the most practical and usable decision aid to assess whether clothing will prevent cold weather injuries, and if not, when they will occur.”

At the heart of CoWEDA is Xu’s Six Cylinder Thermoregulatory Model, or SCTM, a sophisticated framework that breaks the human body into six distinct areas: the head, torso, arms, hands, legs, and feet. By combining the physics and physiology of heat transfer across each of those areas, the model can predict not just whether a soldier is at risk, but when that risk may become critical. Rather than offering a blanket assessment, CoWEDA delivers time-based outputs by telling a leader, for example, that frostbite may occur within two hours or hypothermia within twenty, based on the specific clothing being worn, the environmental conditions, and the physical demands of the mission.

Built for the leader, rather than the individual soldier, CoWEDA allows decision makers to tailor those assessments by inputting expected weather conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed, alongside the planned physical activity level and the clothing ensemble available to the unit. Critically, the aid accounts for the reality that soldiers are not static. A soldier standing still at minus-20 degrees Fahrenheit in a standard Army glove presents a very different risk profile than one moving artillery shells in the same conditions, because physical exertion generates body heat and that changes the equation entirely. CoWEDA captures that nuance.

“CoWEDA is designed for any warfighter going out into a cold weather environment,” said Dr. John Castellani, acting division chief of USARIEM’s Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division. “It is really about prevention. If a leader has an idea of the operation, mission, or training their soldiers are going into, the predicted air temperature, the intended activity, and what clothing is available — CoWEDA will tell them what the risks are.”

Xu’s research has positioned CoWEDA as a resource that extends well beyond the Army with other military branches and federal agencies increasingly turning to the decision aid to inform their own cold weather decision making. One example is the Probability of Survival Decision Aid which USARIEM first developed for the U.S. Coast Guard in 2010. Today, the PSDA has been expanded to incorporate Xu’s thermoregulatory model. It is now mandated for USCG use and runs automatically whenever a rescue swimmer enters the water during a search and rescue operation. When the Coast Guard responded to search for workers who fell into Baltimore Harbor during the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse in 2024, the model was immediately activated, informing leaders how long it was safe to sustain active search operations. Other agencies are adopting the decision aid as well to include: the United Kingdom Coast Guard and the Department of Homeland Security. The science behind CoWEDA is not theoretical, it is already saving lives.

Beyond developing CoWEDA, USARIEM is responsible for producing and maintaining the Army’s cold weather injury prevention and treatment guidance — the doctrine that shapes how leaders think, plan for, and respond to cold weather threats across the force. USARIEM’s research data with CoWEDA affirms what many experienced leaders intuitively know: that no two soldiers respond to cold in the same way.

“The Army values uniformity, but in extreme cold, a one-size-fits-all approach to cold weather dressing can put soldiers at risk. What works for one soldier, may not work for another,” said Castellani. “By allowing a leader to input factors specific to their soldiers and operating environment, CoWEDA does not replace a leader’s judgment, it gives them the ability and researched backed information to exercise it better.”

For the Army and USARIEM, the next steps are about access and integration. Currently as a desktop application, CoWEDA is in the process of being developed into a web-based platform that would make it easier for leaders to access the decision aid without specialized software. The longer-term vision is more ambitious: embedding CoWEDA into the larger operational planning systems already used by military planners, so that cold weather medical risk becomes a standard input in mission planning alongside logistics, terrain, and threat assessments.

“Oftentimes, the medical side is that last part of planning,” explained Castellani. “The hope is that CoWEDA will be embedded into the Army’s broader planning systems such as the Android Tactical Assault Kit, so that the medical side is present from the outset. Then a leader might say, ’we are going to do this mission in these conditions with this clothing, what is our cold weather injury risk’ they will get an evidence-based response and be able to decide if they are willing to accept that risk.”

Ongoing research continues to sharpen the decision aid’s precision. Current studies are examining the specific role of socks in frostbite prevention; a gap identified directly from field feedback. Mannequin and human subject testing are currently underway to generate the data needed to make footwear selection as accurate within CoWEDA.

For now, the decision aid is available, the science is sound, and the need has never been clearer. As more soldiers are called to operate in cold and austere environments, CoWEDA offers leaders something no experience alone can provide, data, certainty, and the confidence to make the right call before the cold does.

Story by Danae Johnson 

Medical Research and Development Command

Armaments Center’s Zero-Defect Culture Embraces Agile and Other Modern Software Development Approaches

Saturday, July 11th, 2026

?PICATINNY ARSENAL, N.J. – The U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Armaments Center has become the nexus for cutting-edge, safety critical software systems that deliver battlefield advantages for U.S. Soldiers.

While the Armaments Center is synonymous with developing weapons and ammunition hardware that formulate the U.S. Army’s lethal backbone, its software operates unseen in a critical juncture where Soldiers and complex systems perform battlefield coordination, advanced command & control and precision fire control that safely delivers modern firepower.

Be it operating a Handheld Mortar Ballistic Computer, generating fires through the modern Artillery Execution Suite (AXS), or entering precise fire missions using the Portable Excalibur Fire Control System, Soldiers routinely carry out complex military missions swiftly, accurately and safely, using Armaments Center-developed software.

Writing code that operates lethal systems cultivates a culture with a fundamentalist’s focus on safety and quality. This was affirmed in January when the Armaments Center earned its second Rear Admiral Grace M. Hopper Award for Software Maintenance, and in spending nearly two decades as the only Army organization appraised with a Maturity Level 5 designation in the CMMI Institute’s Capability Maturity Model Integration Development scale.

Recently, the Armaments Center Director, Chris Grassano, signed the “Armaments Center Modern Software Engineering Policy” which embraces the use of modern software development tools and techniques. This includes Agile software development and Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) architecture, as well as Continuous Integration / Continuous Development (CI/CD) and DevSecOps workflows and tools aligned with the state of the art in the field.

Agile software development has seen growing influence since 17 software practitioners published a manifesto in 2001 that highlights values such as constant collaboration, early and continuous delivery of software, working directly with customers, embracing changes in requirements and favoring software delivery over documentation. It is now widely considered the industry-standard model for the software development lifecycle.

Drawing on best practices and Agile principles employed during AXS development, the Mortars Software Development Team has led the charge on this, working to modernize legacy mortar fire control software for both mounted and dismounted units. The team developed the Common Fire Control Framework, a modular, flexible software architecture designed to adapt to evolving requirements, which enabled the creation of the Mortars App. These initiatives thrived at the Department of Defense’s Weapon Systems Software Summit.

Additionally, the Mortars Team pinpointed opportunities to modernize external processes which had historically slowed delivery to the warfighter. They created a new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to integrate Army Interoperability Certification (AIC) testing into its software development lifestyle.

Previously, an external agency had conducted AIC testing, which increased scheduling demands and costs. By leveraging integrated test teams and incorporating interoperability testing into planned test events, the new SOP reduced risks, costs, and delivery timelines.

Agile-based success can also be found in the AXS Development Team. AXS is software that helps streamline artillery operations, providing a more friendly and adaptable platform compared to its predecessor, the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System.

The AXS Team fuses government leadership and industry expertise to deliver secure, high-quality software to the Capability Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communications, and Network. Using the Scaled Agile Framework, the AXS team delivers capabilities in three-month increments while meeting the needs of the Army Capability Manager for Fires Cells and Targeting. Through continuous integration, continuous deployment automated testing and deep system knowledge, the team has supported live-fire experiments with major artillery platforms.

This government-led Agile approach allows the team to pivot on a dime in response to senior priorities, without delays caused by contract modifications. This transformative approach is occurring at an optimal time, as the Department of War has placed a tremendous focus delivering new capabilities at the speed of modernization.

The United States Ballistics Library (USBL), a modern, Agile-developed alternative to the NATO Ballistics Kernel, also stands at the forefront of the Armament Center’s software modernization efforts. Created at the direction of Army Chief Technology Officer Alex Miller, the USBL can be deployed as a standalone capability or integrated as a cloud-based microservice. It was launched in February 2025 and is well ahead of schedule, with full implementation in the cards this year.

The Armaments Center Software Factory (ACSF) was established to support the need to rapidly deliver weapons systems software such as United States Ballistics Library, Artillery Execution Suite, and the Common Fire Control Framework. The ACSF is a collection of people, tools, and processes that integrate enterprise tools into continuous integration pipelines to automate the build process, implement cybersecurity scanning early and often, and quickly produce working software that meets the needs of the Warfighter. ACSF is a unique software factory optimized for delivery of secure, high-quality weapons systems software.

ACSF integrates enterprise services such as the Army’s DevSecOps organization, with GitLab machines, project-specific tooling and custom continuous integration pipelines. It does this while maintaining compliance with Department of War and Army policies, including Army Directive 2024-02, which enables modern software development and acquisition practices.

Through initiatives such as CF2, AXS, USBL, and ACSF, the Armaments Center strives to redefine how safety-critical defense software is developed. The Armaments Center pursues a culture of improvement, embracing Agile-development and partnering with industry leaders, delivering secure, reliable and advanced software capabilities, and ensuring U.S. forces stay dominant on the modern battlefield.

By Ross Arnold, Maj. Johnathon Hardin, Marc Federico, Julia Gustafson, Christopher Fuller, David Bowlby, Picatinny Arsenal

TECOM Establishes Marine Corps Robotics Integration Group and Counter Drone Team

Friday, July 10th, 2026

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va.— The Marine Corps has established theMarine Corps Robotics Integration Groupas its service-level organization responsible for integrating, standardizing, and institutionalizing training for Group 1 and Group 2 small unmanned aircraft systems and counter-small unmanned aircraft systems across the Total Force, as announced inMARADMIN 307/26.

Assigned under Marine Air Ground Task Force Training Command, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California, MCRIG serves as the Marine Corps’ focal point for unmanned systems training integration, curriculum development, and education. The organization ensures emerging drone capabilities are transformed into standardized programs of instruction, instructor certifications, and enduring training products that can be delivered consistently throughout the Marine Corps.

“The battlefield continues to demonstrate that small unmanned aircraft systems are no longer niche capabilities; they are indispensable tools for reconnaissance, precision strike, force protection and survivability,” said Maj. Gen. Mark H. Clingan, commanding general, MAGTFTC, MCAGCC. “The Marine Corps Robotics Integration Group provides the institutional framework necessary to rapidly integrate validated capabilities into standardized training, ensuring Marines across the Total Force are prepared to employ and defeat these systems in future conflicts.”

The establishment of MCRIG reflects the Marine Corps’ continued effort to adapt to the rapidly evolving character of warfare, where inexpensive, commercially available unmanned aircraft have fundamentally changed how modern militaries detect, target, maneuver, and fight. MCRIG also establishes a deliberate process for transitioning emerging capabilities into formal Marine Corps training.

As the service-level integrator, MCRIG receives validated capability packages, including tactics, techniques and procedures, pilot courses and training requirements, from specialized organizations responsible for experimentation and operational assessment. Once validated, MCRIG develops curriculum, training support packages, and certification standards before distributing them through designated regional hubs that execute standardized instruction across the Fleet Marine Force.

Central to this process are two complementary organizations: the Marine Corps Attack Drone Team and the newly established Marine Corps Counter Drone Team.

“The Marine Corps Attack Drone Team and the Marine Corps Counter Drone Team are designed to move at the speed of technology. Through the analysis of exercises, operations, and purposely designed events we gain critical information about how systems should be employed or defeated,” said Col. Charles Anklam III, commanding officer, Weapons Training Battalion. “Our responsibility is to rigorously test ideas, validate capabilities, and rapidly transition those findings to MCRIG, where they become standardized training that benefits every Marine. This partnership allows us to remain agile to the constantly changing threat, innovate quickly, and provide the fleet with consistently reliable, credible, and operationally relevant information to increase lethality and survivability.”

The Marine Corps established MCCDT to accelerate counter-drone training development in the same way MCADT has supported and advanced attack drone capability development, experimentation, research, testing, and evaluation. Together, the two organizations provide Training Command a focused capability to study both sides of the unmanned systems fight: employment and defeat.

As an organic element of Weapons Training Battalion at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, MCCDT serves as Training Command’s dedicated counter-drone training development cell. Not designed to deploy as an operational force provider, MCCDT’s role is to identify the threat, test emerging solutions, validate practical tactics, and transition those findings to MCRIG for service-wide implementation.

MCCDT integrates lessons from MCWL, MAGTFTC, MCRIG, government partners, industry, and the Fleet Marine Force to ensure counter-drone tactics and training remain operationally relevant. This approach allows the Marine Corps to rapidly assess emerging threats, evaluate available technologies, and convert battlefield lessons into practical training requirements.

Using established Marine Corps guidance and approved training standards as its baseline, MCCDT conducts operational assessments and force-on-force evaluations to refine C-sUAS best practices. Once validated, those recommendations are provided to MCRIG for incorporation into institutional doctrine, curriculum, instructor certifications, and standardized training products.

This relationship creates a disciplined innovation pathway. MCADT and MCCDT move quickly to support the experimentation, assessment, and validation of tactics against emerging unmanned systems challenges, while MCRIG ensures those lessons become consistent, repeatable, and enduring training across the Marine Corps.

Together, these organizations create a continuous cycle of innovation and institutional learning, rapidly identifying and validating lessons through operational assessment, and incorporating them into formal Marine Corps training.

Designated TECOM regional hubs will execute MCRIG-approved courses throughout the Marine Corps, providing geographically distributed training while also returning operational observations and lessons learned to support continuous improvement of curriculum and tactics. The integrated training enterprise provides the Marine Corps with a sustainable framework capable of rapidly adapting as unmanned technologies evolve, ensuring Marines receive standardized, current, and operationally relevant instruction regardless of where they train.

The Marine Corps is also seeking motivated, technically proficient, and innovative Marines to help build this emerging capability. Marines interested in serving in select C-sUAS billets within MCRIG are encouraged to review MARADMIN 307/26 for eligibility requirements and application procedures.

The establishment of MCRIG and MCCDT represents another significant milestone in the Marine Corps’ broader modernization efforts, ensuring Marines remain prepared to employ and counter rapidly evolving unmanned systems while preserving the agility, lethality, and survivability required on tomorrow’s battlefield.

Story by Maj Hector Infante 

U.S. Marine Corps Training and Education Command

Thermal Comfort as a Tactical Advantage

Friday, July 10th, 2026

Expert interview with Martin Bentz, CEO of Outlast Technologies

Modern soldier systems are becoming more advanced, more protective and more complex. But with every additional layer of equipment, the microclimate close to the body becomes more critical. Heat build-up, perspiration, cold bridges and loss of comfort can all affect endurance, concentration and operational readiness.

Outlast Technologies addresses this challenge with textile technologies designed to support thermal balance, comfort and performance in demanding environments: Outlast® Temperature Regulation and Aersulate® high-performance insulation. In this interview, Martin Bentz, CEO of Outlast Technologies, explains why thermal comfort is becoming an increasingly important factor in military and protective textile systems.

Mr. Bentz, why is thermal management becoming such an important topic in modern soldier systems?

Modern protective clothing has to do many things at once. It must protect, support mobility, be durable, and often integrate with additional equipment such as body armor, backpacks, communication systems or load-bearing gear. This creates highly complex clothing systems.

The challenge is that every additional layer also influences the microclimate close to the body. Heat can build up, moisture can accumulate, and the wearer may start to sweat even before the physical workload becomes extreme. In military environments, this is not just a comfort issue. Thermal stress can increase physical strain and may make it harder to stay focused over long periods.

That is why we believe thermal comfort should be seen as part of operational performance. If the body is less distracted by overheating, sweating or chilling, the wearer has better conditions to remain comfortable, alert and ready to perform.

In many cases, textiles focus on moisture management. Why is that not always enough?

Moisture management is important, but it usually starts when perspiration is already there. The textile reacts to sweat by transporting it away from the skin. That can be useful, but it means the body has already entered a state of thermal imbalance.

Our approach with Outlast® Temperature Regulation is different. The technology is designed to act earlier. It helps absorb excess heat, store it and release it again when needed. The goal is to support a more balanced microclimate before the wearer becomes too hot or too cold.

For military and protective applications, this can be highly relevant because wearers often move between different activity levels and environments. A soldier may stand still for a period of time, then suddenly become highly active, then return to a lower activity level. Textile systems must be able to support these transitions.

How does Outlast® Temperature Regulation work in simple terms?

The technology is based on microencapsulated natural wax. These tiny capsules can absorb excess body heat when the wearer becomes too warm. When the body or the surrounding microclimate cools down again, the stored heat can be released back.

This helps reduce temperature peaks and supports a more stable microclimate. It is not about making a textile cold. It is about creating a more balanced comfort zone.

For the wearer, this can mean less overheating, less perspiration build-up and a more comfortable feeling during changing conditions. In some applications, tests have shown perspiration reduction of up to 48%, depending on product construction and use case. In demanding environments, this can contribute to reduced physical discomfort and better conditions for focus and endurance.

Where do you see the strongest potential for Outlast® Temperature Regulation in military applications?

There are many possible areas. Base layers are an obvious example, because they are worn directly next to the skin and strongly influence the body’s thermal perception. But the technology can also be relevant in linings, mid layers, gloves, socks, sleeping systems or textile components used under protective equipment.

One interesting area is clothing worn under ballistic protection or other heavy gear. These systems often limit ventilation, which can make the microclimate more challenging. A textile technology that helps manage heat and moisture build-up can provide a real comfort benefit.

We also see potential in situations with changing temperatures: moving between vehicles and outside environments, between heated indoor spaces and cold outdoor conditions, or between high activity and rest phases.

You also focus on Aersulate®. What makes this technology interesting for military and protective textiles?

Aersulate® is a high-performance insulation technology based on aerogel. Aerogel is known for its extremely low thermal conductivity. The challenge has always been to bring this performance into textile structures in a practical and wearable way.

With Aersulate®, we can enable thin, flexible and high-performing insulation concepts. This is especially interesting for military applications because volume, weight and freedom of movement are always critical. If a jacket, glove or protective textile can be thinner while still offering strong insulation performance, this opens completely new design opportunities.

The technology can also support multifunctional textile constructions. For example, it can be combined with different textile carriers, including solutions for protective or flame-resistant applications, depending on the construction and material concept.

Why is thin insulation such an important advantage?

In military clothing, bulk is a major issue. Thick insulation can restrict movement, increase pack volume and make layering more difficult. It can also interfere with equipment such as body armor, harnesses or backpacks.

A thinner insulation concept can help designers create garments that are easier to wear, easier to pack and better suited to complex equipment systems. It can also support better fit and mobility.

Another important point is performance under pressure. In real use, insulation is often compressed – for example at the shoulders under backpack straps, at the elbows, knees or seat areas. Many conventional insulation materials lose performance when compressed. Aersulate® can help address this challenge by enabling insulation concepts that perform even in demanding constructions.

How does this connect to RCT values and measurable performance?

In technical textiles, performance must be measurable. RCT values are a key indicator for thermal resistance, showing how effectively a material slows down heat flow.

With Aersulate®, strong insulation performance can be achieved in very thin textile constructions. Depending on the article, Aersulate® fabrics with a thickness of only 1.1 reach RCT values of 0.08, combined with low thermal conductivity values down to 0.028 W/mK. This gives product developers more freedom to reduce bulk, work with slimmer constructions or design advanced multilayer systems while still targeting measurable thermal performance.

Aersulate® also shows its strength under pressure. In a test with a 100 °C heating plate and a 5 kg weight applied to the fabric, the Aersulate® felt reached only around 60 °C after 12 minutes, while a comparable felt without Aersulate® reached around 75 °C. This makes Aersulate® especially relevant for applications where insulation has to perform in limited space, under load or close to heat sources.

For military and protective markets, measurable performance is essential. It is not enough for a material to feel good in a showroom. It has to deliver reliable benefits in demanding real-world conditions.

You mentioned flame-resistant constructions. How important is that for this target group?

It can be very important, depending on the application. Military and protective textiles often have to meet multiple requirements at once. Thermal comfort alone is not enough. A fabric may also need durability, flame resistance, abrasion resistance, breathability, low bulk or compatibility with other equipment.

This is where textile engineering becomes interesting. Aersulate® is not just an insulation material; it can be part of a broader construction concept. Depending on the textile carrier and system design, it can contribute to multifunctional fabrics that combine insulation with other protective properties.

The future of military textiles is not one single function. It is the intelligent combination of functions in one system.

What is the biggest misconception about thermal comfort in protective clothing?

Many people still think of comfort as something secondary – something nice to have after protection and durability have been solved. But in demanding applications, comfort has a direct impact on the wearer.

If a person overheats, sweats heavily or feels cold during low-activity phases, this creates additional stress. The body has to work harder to maintain balance. Over time, this can affect endurance, concentration and the overall ability to perform.

Thermal comfort should therefore not be seen as a luxury. It is part of functional performance.

What message would you like to give to military equipment developers and textile engineers?

Do not look at thermal comfort as an afterthought. Consider it from the very beginning of product development.

A garment or textile system can meet all formal requirements and still be uncomfortable in real use if the microclimate is not managed properly. Especially in military and protective applications, where equipment is worn for long periods and under high physical stress, this can make a major difference.

Our message is simple: advanced thermal management can help create better conditions for the wearer. Less thermal stress, better comfort and more design freedom are not separate goals. They are part of the same performance story.

About Outlast Technologies

Outlast Technologies is the Temperature Specialist in Textile and develops solutions for apparel, bedding, footwear, protective clothing, military and technical textile applications. Its portfolio includes Outlast® Temperature Regulation, based on microencapsulated natural wax, and Aersulate® high-performance insulation, designed to enable thin, efficient and multifunctional textile constructions.

For more information, visit www.outlast.com.

FirstSpear Friday Focus: Shadow Pack

Friday, July 10th, 2026

Not every mission looks like one. The FirstSpear SHADOW PACK was designed to offer a low-profile solution for carrying short rifles, sub-guns, or shotguns without advertising the fact. Its soft, non-tactical exterior blends into urban environments and plain-clothes operations where discretion isn’t a preference; it’s a requirement. Fully adjustable shoulder straps and a quick-release sternum strap keep the pack secure and allow for rapid removal when speed matters. 

Feature Call-Outs:

  • DISCREET, NON-TACTICAL EXTERIOR
  • LIGHTWEIGHT, DURABLE CONSTRUCTION 
  • QUICK-RELEASE STERNUM STRAP
  • CARRIES SHORT RIFLES, SUB-GUNS, AND SHOTGUNS

At its core, the SHADOW PACK combines lightweight, durable construction with a purpose-built interior designed around the mission. Multiple interior and exterior pockets provide organized storage for magazines, tools, and mission-specific gear, while a rear zippered compartment keeps small essentials accessible and out of sight. Available in Black, Multicam Black, and Stone/Manatee Grey/Rust, the SHADOW PACK delivers covert capability without unnecessary bulk or compromise.

Built for military personnel, law enforcement officers, and prepared professionals who demand reliable equipment, the SHADOW PACK delivers low-visibility carry without sacrificing organization or access. Purpose-driven, covert, and comfortable; it brings discreet capability to those who need it most. FirstSpear is the premier source for cutting-edge tactical gear for military, law enforcement, and those who train. For more information, visit First-Spear.com.