GORE-TEX Professional

NARCO Medication Panel by Blue Tide Innovations

June 2nd, 2025

Narco Panel by Blue Tide Innovations features elastic loops on a lightweight, yet rigid board for the organized storage, accountability, and rapid deployment of controlled medications in operational environments.

Developed in collaboration with special operations medics and tactical professionals, this panel ensures critical medications are accessible, secure, and mission-ready.

The NARCO Medication panel is sold as a pair, featuring MED panel and ADMIN panel. 

Made in Miami, Florida.  Berry & IR/IRR/NIR compliant.

bluetideinnovations.com/ols/products/narco-medication-panel

Canada Pursues NATO STANAG of 6.5 x 43mm

June 2nd, 2025

During my visit to Canada last week, I spoke with multiple people across the Army and industry and one topic dominated discussions, the 6.5 x 43 cartridge.

You probably know it by the designation of 264 USA, named when it was developed by the US Army Marksmanship Unit as an intermediate cartridge. Turns out, it’s a ballistic Goldilocks between 5.56 and 7.62 NATO and that term came up over and over in conversation. It offers additional range and lethality over both 5.56 and 7.62 NATO with a compromise in ammunition weight between the two. Additionally, it can also be used for both rifle and belt-fed applications.

Those of you familiar with the FN America Lightweight Intermediate Caliber Cartridge (LICC) Individual Weapon System (IWS) developed for the Irregular Warfare Technology Support Directorate (IWTSD), will know the caliber which at one point has also been referred to as “264 International” as a nod to the program’s co-sponsor CANSOFCOM. They are so impressed with what they’ve observed during the LICC program that they have decided to press forward.

With an eye to the future, CANSOFCOM is pursuing a NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) for 6.5 x 43 mm in partnership with at least one additional NATO member. At this point, the other party has not been disclosed. However, I know it is not the US, which has been working on the 6.8 x 51mm common case cartridge as their path forward.

STANAG 4884. Technical Performance Specifications Providing For The Interchangeability of 6.5mm x 43 Ammunition.

With this new development, it seems that the caliber wars aren’t yet over. Hopefully, with NATO standardization, likely with brass and composite case designs, we will see more manufacturers of ammunition as well as additional weapon designs.

We will update this story as we learn more.

– By Eric Graves

USMC Affirms Confidence in Modular Handgun System

June 2nd, 2025

Back in April a reader posted a link to this 2023 USMC incident report regarding a negligent discharge of an M18 Modular Handgun System pistol by a foreign national gate guard on Okinawa, to the comments section of SSD. I read it and wondered why I hadn’t heard about it. Current hysteria over the P320 aside, Modular Handgun System pistols are equipped with a manual safety. If one did indeed discharge all by itself while “safe and secure in the holster”, as alleged in this indecent report, there are significant concerns over the safety of our service members regarding the over 400,000 pistols in service.

You can download the report here.

As you can imagine, the report began to circulate as confirmation bias that the M18 pistol which is based on SIG SAUER’s popular P320, is doing this or that. Unfortunately, getting to the bottom of the issue takes awhile, particularly with a vigorous travel schedule and when going back and forth with the government. Despite this, I dug in.

Considering the pistol has a manual safety and was in a holster and claims that nothing impacting the trigger, something seemed off. I asked around about the report and heard that there was more to the story and it would be best if I made a formal inquiry. Consequently, I approached the DoD Program office for MHS, Product Manager Soldier Weapons (PdM SW), which is subordinate to Project Manager Soldier Lethality at Picatinny Arsenal. They stepped right up and looked into the issue as they weren’t familiar with the mishap despite the conclusion of the incident report which was to “recommend that an engineering review of the M18 be conducted.”

I asked for a statement from PdM SW but they informed me that, as the incident had occurred in the Marine Corps, I should pursue further inquiries with Marine Corps Installation Command Pacific. I sent them an email inquiry and finally heard back after this story was published. They offered a simple statement, standing by the report.

Next, I went to Marine Corps Systems Command. Their PAO interfaced with the command and offered this statement based on my initial inquiry regarding the incident report.

The incident was appropriately reported to the Naval Safety Command, which is where the provided pdf of the incident report was sourced from in response to a FOIA request. All factual information was released in accordance with FOIA. Deliberative portions of the safety investigations are subject to executive privilege, and they will not be released to any person or entity, except within the Department of Defense, for mishap and loss prevention purposes.

I had obviously asked the wrong command, the wrong question. They didn’t investigate it. Since my main concern was whether the weapon was safe for use, that’s what I ended up asking.

Late last week, the Marine Corps Systems Command Public Affairs Office provided this statement on behalf of the command:

The M18 was rigorously tested to DoD standards before being selected for use by our Marines, and we have not seen any evidence that indicates design or manufacturing issues are present. In addition to the initial testing, each lot of weapons produced for the U.S. Government is subject to extensive lot acceptance testing with oversight by the Defense Contract Management Agency and the Service from which the order was placed (Army/Marine Corps).

The Marine Corps has full confidence in the quality, performance, and safety of the M18 handgun. The MHS is designed, built, and tested to military standards to ensure safe and effective employment during training and combat.

At least one other website reported this incident and only used the incident report as the basis of their post. They never bothered to contact the military. While we may never know what actually happened in this instance, the reality is that the Marine Corps (and Army) stand behind the safety of the MHS program. Here we are, over two years later and the pistols remain in service.

That is the ultimate concern, that service members can maintain faith and confidence in their equipment, particularly those items that they must depend their lives on, such as PPE and weapons. It was my goal to determine whether or not this was the case and the Army and Marine Corps have asserted their position that MHS is safe.

By Eric Graves

Academic Partnership Advances Quality Assurance for the Army Personnel Parachute System

June 2nd, 2025

NATICK, MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES

NATICK, Mass. – In a strategic collaboration with the Army’s Personnel Airdrop Systems (PADS) team, a group of Northeastern University industrial engineering students culminated their senior capstone competition, delivering more than first prize.

The Parachute Quality Assurance Modernization Team, mentored by U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) aerospace engineer Tashfiq “Tash,” Salam, stood out among 40 engineering teams, each challenged to develop real-world solutions for government and industry use.

Guided by a shared mission, the team of four delivered an award-winning design: a suite of integrated digital tools, modernizing quality assurance for one of Airborne’s most critical and lifesaving capabilities – the personnel parachute systems.

Under the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology ASA(ALT) acquisition standards, every newly manufactured parachute must undergo a thorough inspection before being fielding to units. For the PADS team, this typically requires inspecting 8 to 13 parachutes at a time. According to the students’ research, that process can involve manually reviewing more than 5,000 data points, inspecting and measuring every stitch of fabric, harness and compartment encompassing a parachute system.

“It’s physically demanding,” Tash said. “You’re handling this large parachute; you have to inspect every inch of it. There’s a lot of surface area and a lot of steps.”

Over the course of the capstone project, the team studied those protocols applying direct feedback from quality assurance specialists, engineers and industry professionals. Their final prototype introduced an integrated software system complete with a set of digital measuring tools, capable of logging exact measurements up to 1/16th of an inch with a single click.

Tash shared how the students’ concept significantly improved the QA process, demonstrating the ability to reduce manual inspection time by nearly two hours without compromising quality.
“This is a zero-tolerance environment,” Salam said. “And the operating environment continues to get more complex every day. We needed to ensure the parachute capability we deliver is 100 percent what Soldiers need and in the way they want it. Because at the end of the day, once they land, they still have a follow-on mission. The parachute is just a ride to the mission.”

To support their research, students conducted site visits at the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center in Massachusetts, where Tash serves as a government civilian with Product Manager – Soldier Clothing and Individual Equipment (PdM SCIE), under the Program Executive Office – Soldier. They also met with DEVCOM engineers and Rhode Island National Guard members to gather feedback from quality assurance specialists and Soldiers who regularly perform parachute inspections
With more than 200,000 military free-fall and static line jumps conducted annually, ensuring consistent quality in each parachute is critical to Soldier safety.

“They understood the weight of that responsibility,” said Tash. This wasn’t about checking a box on an academic checklist; they were creating a real capability.”

The centralized system also enhances traceability, allowing inspectors to better assess the acquired measurements and key data points through the digital took it. The data is reported with real time feedback giving the PADS QA team the ability to run analytics on past inspections, identify error trends and performance metrics. As described by Tash, the system supports the PADS team mission of continuously delivering world class products to the airborne warfighter.

Ensuring students were immersed in PADS and SCIE operations was faculty advisor and key partner Dr. B. Kris’ Jaeger-Helton, Director of Capstone Design for Industrial Engineering at Northeastern. Jaeger-Helton celebrated the project as an important model for real-world learning.

“The experience was both challenging and open-ended, with clearly defined security constraints that had to be followed as well, making it the ideal Capstone project,” she said.

This year’s team built upon the foundation of the 2023–2024 capstone, which transitioned the Army’s inspection records from paper-based logs to an Excel-based digital tool. With Tash’s mentorship, this year’s Capstone expanded that concept collecting data from the T-11, MC-6, and RA-1 parachute systems.

Jaeger-Helton, who supported both capstone efforts, emphasized the value of the Army–academic collaboration.
“The capstone students genuinely benefitted from the support of Tash’s dedicated and highly knowledgeable team,” she said. “As clients, the Army PADS team communicated the importance, seriousness, and value of this initiative, while also expressing their trust and confidence in the Northeastern team. I’m looking forward to continuing our partnership for more great initiatives.”

Now in his second year mentoring a NU engineering capstone, Tash highlighted the importance of engaging with emerging talent in support of innovation and advancing Army capabilities.

“That kind of ingenuity and creativity has to come from somewhere, and it often comes from a sense of purpose in what you’re working on,” Salam said. “There was a lot of pride in the student team because they knew they were doing something that matters.”

Story by Khylee Woodford 
PEO Soldier

Israel Shoots Down Enemy Drone With Rafael Laser System

June 1st, 2025

Rafael Advanced Defense Systems shared the following statement late last week on X:

Screenshot

World First — Combat-Proven Laser Defense, Powered by Rafael

For the first time in history, high-power laser systems have been used to intercept aerial threats in combat.

This unprecedented breakthrough took place during the Swords of Iron War — with Rafael’s advanced technology at the heart of the operation.

Developed in close partnership with the Israel Ministry of Defense and the Israeli Air Force, Rafael’s laser interceptors were successfully deployed by the IAF’s Aerial Defense Array, neutralizing enemy threats with speed, precision, and zero cost per shot.

“Israel is the first country in the world to transform high-power laser technology into a fully operational system – and to execute actual combat interceptions.”

— Dr. Yuval Steinitz, Chairman, Rafael

“Rafael is leading the energy weapon revolution. The ingenuity of our teams and deep investment in R&D led to this monumental achievement.”

— Yoav Tourgeman, CEO, Rafael

These systems mark the beginning of a new era in warfare — one that will soon expand with the delivery of Iron Beam, Rafael’s next-generation laser weapon designed to reshape the future of air defense.

This is not theory. This is real. Combat-proven. Operational. Historic.

* Photos from video posted by Rafael to X.

Rugged Suppressors Contributes $40,000 to Support ASA

June 1st, 2025

Travelers Rest, SC – The American Suppressor Association (ASA) is proud to announce that Rugged Suppressors has renewed its support for 2025 with a $40,000 contribution, reinforcing its deep commitment to protecting and advancing suppressor rights across the country.

“At Rugged Suppressors, we believe that suppressors have no place under the National Firearms Act,” said Michael Derdziak, CEO of Rugged Suppressors. “The ASA is the only organization with the focus, strategy, and drive to get them removed. We’re proud to support their mission and stand alongside them in the fight to protect the rights of responsible gun owners nationwide.”

Rugged Suppressors has built its name on uncompromising quality and innovation, producing some of the most durable and reliable suppressors in the industry. Their continued support reflects a shared vision with the ASA: a future where suppressors are treated like the hearing protection tools they are, not burdened by outdated federal restrictions.

“Rugged Suppressors has once again stepped up in a big way,” said Knox Williams, Executive Director of the ASA. “Their $40,000 contribution directly supports our work on Capitol Hill to remove suppressors from the NFA. Michael and his team understand what’s at stake, and they continue to lead by example. With their partnership, we’re able to push harder, go further, and stay focused on real policy change.”

Department of Defense Warrior Games Announces Service Teams with Nearly 200 Athletes Set to Participate in the Annual Event

June 1st, 2025

Fifty Days Until the Return of the Games to Colorado Springs; ESPN+ to Provide Event Coverage

Colorado Springs, Colo. – May 29, 2025 – The Department of Defense (DoD) Warrior Games celebrates the resilience, determination, and triumph of wounded, ill, and injured military personnel and veterans. This year, the Games will take place in Colorado Springs, Colorado, at the main venue Colorado College from July 18-26, bringing together competitors from all over the U.S. representing all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces. Each competitor exemplifies the Warrior Games spirit of recovery and perseverance, having overcome significant physical and mental challenges to reach this national  stage.

“The Warrior Games are more than a competition,” said Mr. Dave Paschal, director of the DoD Warrior Games. “They’re a testament to the healing power of sport, camaraderie, and community and provide a platform for athletes to showcase their strength and recovery while raising awareness of the sacrifices made by military personnel and their families. We are anticipating an exciting and empowering Games from the nearly 200 competitors named to their respective service teams.”

Five teams of athletes will be representing all military services: Army, Marine Corps, Navy/Coast Guard, Air Force/Space Force, and Special Operations Command.

The complete list of the competitors for the 2025 Warrior Games can be found through these links for their respective branch:

Army 

Marine Corps

Navy/ Coast Guard

Air Force/ Space Force

Special Operations Command

The athletes will compete in 11 different adaptive sports including archery, cycling, field, indoor rowing, powerlifting, precision air sports, sitting volleyball, swimming, track, wheelchair basketball, and wheelchair rugby.

More information about the Games, including the event schedule, volunteer opportunities, and ticketing information will be available soon on the DoD Warrior Games website HERE.

Saturday Night Movie – “First Strike”

June 1st, 2025

This week we continue our focus on the Cold War nuclear enterprise with the 1979 documentary “First Strike.”

Courtesy of Lion Heart Film Works, this film was created in partnership with the United States Department of Defense and the RAND Corporation to examine the United States Armed Forces strategy for dealing with nuclear warfare. The film that starts with showing a hypothetical Soviet nuclear first strike scenario leading to a U.S. surrender, followed by a United States Air Force “sales pitch” for more defense spending. The film became far better known when various clips were edited into the 1983 TV-movie “The Day After,” and the 1983 movie “War Games”.

The film used actual Air Force personnel for actors, filming on location at various United States Air Force installations. Specifically, the film used cameras on-board Strategic Air Command command planes out of Offutt Air Force Base, and also shot footage inside the SAC Headquarters where scenes were used to depict the NORAD Cheyenne Mountain Command Post. The nuclear missile launch sequence seen in the film (and later in “The Day After”) was performed by actual Air Force officers stationed with the 742d Missile Squadron at Minot Air Force Base.