TYR Tactical

2022 S&S Precision Catalog

February 7th, 2022

Available now.

True Velocity To Launch The Genesis Rifle

February 7th, 2022

True Velocity has announced their new bullpup, “The Genesis” which is the commercial version of their US Army Next Generation Squad Weapon candidate rifle in 6.8 TVCM.

To reserve your place in line sign up with your email. There will be limited production so act quickly. You will be receiving more information soon regarding the commercial version of the Next Generation platform “The Genesis”.

www.tvammo.com

Come See UF PRO at IWA & Enforce Tac 2022

February 6th, 2022

Be amongst the first to see the very latest UF PRO gear and meet our team in person.

Come visit our booth at the IWA or Enforce Tac trade shows.

ENFORCE TAC MISSION BRIEF:

     | Dates: 1. March – 2. March
     | Location: Exhibition Centre, Nuremberg, Germany
     | Hall number: 12
     | Booth number: 12-432

IWA MISSION BRIEF:

     | Dates: 3. March – 6. March
     | Location: Exhibition Centre, Nuremberg, Germany
     | Hall number: 3
     | Booth number: 3-315

SCUBAPRO Sunday – Head and Chest Protection

February 6th, 2022

As we are starting to get into fall and the water begins to get colder. You will have to start looking at, adding more to what you wear when you dive. One of the best ways to add warmth without adding a lot more rubber is to add a hood and a vest. The vest helps keep your chest warm, from the tie you enter the water. I like a vest because it helps with that first blast of cold water that always hits your chest. Since you lose about 75 percent of your body heat through your head even if the water is warm, you will lose heat thru it. Hoods and vest are usually made from neoprene and are designed for wearing in either warm or cold water. Again, as with wetsuits, the thicker the hood/vest, the better it is for colder water. One of the most significant drawbacks to diving, in general, is the thinker anything is, gloves, suit, or hood the more mobility you lose. There are two types of hoods, warm and cold water. Warm water hoods are less cumbersome and typically cover your head and neck. They can be used for warmth and to help protect your head.

Warm vs. Coldwater Hoods

When diving in cold water, a thick neoprene hood that covers your head and neck will be the most practical. The thicker the neoprene, the warmer you head will be. Coldwater dive hoods typically have a sizable bib, which can be tucked into your wetsuit at the neck opening. The bib reduces the transfer of water and keeps the diver that much warmer. The bib comes down to cover the neck and some of the chest, like a bib for kids. There is also hooded vest, and those cover the head and the chest. Cold-water hoods cover some or all of the diver’s forehead and jaw/chin areas, and it also includes a good part of the diver’s cheeks. It tries to leave as little of the diver’s face exposed to the cold water as possible — ordinary just room for the mask and the regulator.

Warm-water dive hoods are much thinner and typically do not have large bib like cold-water hoods. Warm water hoods and vests are suitable for long-duration diving in warm water. It isn’t so thick that you overheat from the start, but with a long dive, you will start to get cold. If you are warm, you can also vent the hood/ vest, and as the dive goes on, you will be warmer. You can even sometimes start the dive without the hood, and then if you are cold, you can put it on. Hooded vests are good for that as you can just pull the hood up as you are diving.

The right fitting dive hood should not be too loose; if you’re going for a cold-water hood, it should feel snug around your cheeks and jaw and should cover most of your forehead. Still, it should not feel too tight – if it is uncomfortable around the throat or facial area, then you’ll need to go up a size. Basically, if the hood creates discomfort along the face or neck/throat, it is too small. If water freely flows in and out of the hood, it is too big. Too loose a hood will not protect you from the elements at all, as water will be able to flow in and out freely. Layering is the key to warmth when diving.

SCUBAPRO’s line of Hoods, Vest and Hooded Vest can provide that extra layer to help keep you warmer longer when diving. The SCUBAPRO 2.5/0.5mm Unisex Hooded Vest is just what you need for a little extra warmth on colder water dives. When you are in warm water locations, add a hooded vest over a spring suit or under a Shorty or Fullsuit, you add warmth and will be able to stay in longer. The vest is easy to don and doff and is fast drying for days that have multiple dives. The vest is 2.mm thick in the hood chest and back and 0.5mm thick on the ultra-stretch side panels.

SCUBAPRO has also updated its popular Hybrid line, which includes a thermal long sleeve top, cargo shorts, and a sleeveless hooded vest. The line also consists of a full suit that is great for long-duration warm water dives or under cammies to help keep you warm. The Hybrid Hooded Vest‘s ultra-comfortable neoprene/nylon blend does a great job of protecting your torso and head, two critical areas for minimizing heat loss, providing comfort, warmth, and protection where you need it most. On the underside of the nylon panels, a micro-plush interior makes the vest warm and cozy.

This fleece fabric absorbs less water, which keeps heat against the body, increasing overall warmth. It also dries quickly. This hooded vest can be worn by itself or layered over a long-sleeve thermal rash guard to increase warmth and protection and built with a mix of quality 1.5mm X-Foam neoprene for warmth and durable nylon for stretch and comfort. Highly versatile ideal for divers, snorkelers, paddle boarders, swimmers, and anyone that needs more protection from the elements to include long boat rides. I have used pieces in this line for an Alcatraz swim (1.5mile), and it worked great. Unique styling keeps you warm, protected, and looking good — form-fitting for that sleek, hydrodynamic look and feel.

Savage Arms Announces Sponsorship of The Canadian Rimfire Precision Series

February 6th, 2022

WESTFIELD, Massachusetts – February 3, 2022 – Savage Arms is proud to announce its upgraded partnership with the Canadian Rimfire Precision Series (CRPS). With their upgraded partnership, Savage’s Precision Series rifles are now the exclusive Firearm of the Rimfire Competition Academy, and Savage now stands as a platinum sponsor of the more than twenty CRPS competitions.

“The Canadian Rimfire Precision Series is proud to be working with Savage Arms on an expanded sponsorship for the 2022 season,” said Rick Katigbak of CRPS. “Their support of our newly announced Rimfire Competition Academy and Rimfire Nation Discovery days, allows us to bring Savage Arms’ line of precision rimfire rifles to Canadians coast-to-coast to help them discover the joy of shooting. Savage Arms long history of producing rimfire rifles in Lakefield Ontario made them the logical choice as our primary rimfire rifle partner for the series. We look forward to the coming season and the opportunity to showcase Savage Arms at our events and competitions.”

By standardizing on the rimfire .22 long rifle cartridge for its competitions, CRPS provides fun, challenging and cost-effective events suitable for participants of all ages and experience levels.

“It’s an honor to work with CRPS for another season,” said Beth Shimanski, Director of Marketing at Savage Arms. “Our upgraded sponsorship not only allows us to showcase our rimfire rifles but gives us the opportunity to work with CRPS as they dedicate their efforts to opening up affordable shooting sports to everyone and that fits perfectly with our mission at Savage Arms.”

More information on the Canadian Rimfire Precision Series can be found at rimfireprecision.ca.

Savage press releases can be found at savagearms.com/content?p=news.

10th SFG(A) – Cold Weather Training Instructor Course

February 6th, 2022

What does it mean to be a Winter Warfighting Expert?

Currently, 10th SFG(A) Green Berets are in a frozen wilderness mastering the aptitude to train, plan and facilitate cold-weather training at the battalion level to meet our specific arctic warfare mandate.

CWT encompasses backcountry mobility, avalanche awareness and preparedness, winter survival, snowmobile operations and advanced riding techniques and special operations small unit tactics on skis or snowmobiles.

Accordingly, the Cold Weather Training Instructor Course is designed to develop professional instructors to return to their unit as skilled teachers and leaders for their unit’s CWT events.

Primary Focus – Are You Really Shooting Past 300 Yards with an AR?

February 5th, 2022

Perhaps the title of this article is a bit out of place considering many of the readers are already taking shots at three hundred yards or more with an AR. Even with an AR-15, that doesn’t lend itself as well to long range precision shooting as the AR-10 or cloned versions of the .308 AR, shooters are consistently taking shots past 300 yards with an AR.

In fact, with a simple change like a bolt-on, drop-in AR-15 conversion upper, one could even reasonably expect to get to under a minute of angle at 300 yards shooting a popular mainstream cartridge.

Perhaps a better explanation of what this article is about is how one could take any regular AR-15, or AR-10 and put it in a consistent 300 yard range for anything within the spectrum of being capable of using an AR platform to accomplish.

The concepts we want to explore at some level in this article are:

• Can you take consistent shots at three hundred yards with your run-of-the-mill AR?

• Can the AR compete broadly against other platforms shooting at more than 300 yards on a regular basis?

• Can the AR be built to be a real competitor, and can it have multivariate use cases at more than 300 yards, consistently?

• What are the limits of the current AR spectrum of rifles, out of factory?

• What are the limits of bespoke builds based on the AR spectrum of rifles when absolute attention is paid to long-range precision accuracy?

• What should you focus on when building, or buying an AR capable of taking difficult shots at longer ranges and turning them into routine, easy to take shots?

In this article we’d like to explore the concept of the AR moving past the hurdle of 300 + yards of range with any kind of capability, into a Brave new world for the AR platform. What follows is a more in-depth discussion about how you can get ultra consistent performance out of an AR platform, far beyond where most normal shooters are pushing the firearm.

Can you really make the argument that the AR platform is suitable for a consistent shot taking on targets that matter past 300 yards?

This point is pretty much settled in stone at this time, with the AR platform having been proven to be a success hunting game animals, and shooting in mainstream competitions, where the AR may not have been a factor in the previous decades. So, the answer is already existent: the AR certainly can shoot past 300 yards with accuracy and lethality in pretty much any configuration.

Where it really becomes an issue, and where there is a real world application here, that needs further discussion is when defining what are the parameters at the extreme end of the spectrum that constrain the AR platform from an accuracy or lethality perspective. And this is not just a discussion that starts and ends with the 5.56 or the .223. The AR-15 is much more than the original AR-15 that came out in the sixties.

Given the plethora of options, loads, optics and other add-on components that now is extant in the AR arena, what can the AR do in the realm past 300 yards?

From a hunting perspective:

We’ve all got a friend that has a mythical story of taking a trophy game animal across a ridge, past a Valley, that’s probably more than 850 yards, and who knows how much of the truth got stretched in that story.

From the perspective of the AR, certainly it’s capable of being built into a rifle that can shoot and reliably take large game animals at 850 yards. However, this tends to be at the outer limits of what’s capable with a multi receiver build, like the AR platform.

It is certainly not outside the realm of possibility to build an AR-15 that can shoot 650 yards or more, and dispatch a moderately sized game animal, or on the lowest end of the spectrum of the largest game animals.

Furthermore, it’s quite easy to build an AR-10, depending on the cartridge that can take a large game animal at 850 yards. Whether or not the shooter has the skill level to do so on a consistent basis, will be up to the shooter and their experience.

Certainly, these are at the limits of where the AR-15 and the component parts are currently on the market.

That isn’t to say that thousand-yard shots can be done or haven’t been taken, but to be consistent, and to be consistent with gamesmanship principles, especially when hunting an animal, it might not make sense to push the envelope past 650 yards unless you have absolute confidence that such a shot can be lethal, well-placed, and is a smart shot to take at that moment.

From a competition perspective:

For a 3-gun competition shooter, the realistic need to shoot up to 500 yards is even few and far between. Essentially, if you’ve built a gun that can handle 500 yards (which many out of the box factory rifles can handle, easily at minute of angle), you’ll be okay.

For a CMP sanctioned match, that is what most people know as “National Match Competitions” run by the Civilian Marksmanship Program with a lot of carryover into the military end of the spectrum. In these competitions, if you’ve built a gun that can handle 600 yd at a minute of angle, you’ll be more than prepared.

For the NRA’s competition “America’s Rifle Challenge”, for a level one match, anything that can shoot minute of angle at 100 yards is acceptable; and for a level two match, anything that can shoot at five hundred yards or closer at minute of angle is more than acceptable.

From a competition perspective, you’re going to be shooting at targets on average less than 350 yards away. Very rarely are you even looking at a 700 yd + shot. The sweet spot on the high end of the range spectrum is under 350 yards for the .223/5.56 – a shooter can compensate for beyond that quickly with a BDC type optic too.

From an anti-personnel or anti-materiel (or a general law enforcement) perspective:

Because a man sized target, and the threat level that a target like that might perpetuate, taking long distance shots on an AR platform, simply isn’t the best practice for law enforcement. This is especially true when the target has access to or is wielding a firearm or is in a hostage situation of any type. 

When law enforcement and military are utilizing an AR style rifle as an anti-personnel implementation, the range is reduced, and the projectile is increased in payload size.

This is to ensure a single shot kill. Most law enforcement agencies will not be shooting an AR style rifle at any distance more than 250 to 300 yards.

Even then, this is at the far end of the spectrum of where the liability concerns and difficulty in consistent shot placement become a factor. In today’s legal environment, law enforcement tried to avoid concerns like that.

Rather than trust a basic beat cop and their basic rifle in their basic Police cruiser to be able to take shots past say, two hundred yards, in a situation that may even be time-sensitive, a department would likely opt for a long-range precision marksman on staff to take that shot, and likely with a different platform of rifle.

Now, speaking in the real world, many law enforcement agencies utilize the AR-10, or even the AR-15 for moderate ranges, and even into the long-range precision marksman category. Not everything is done with Remington 700’s or Winchester 70’s, or Steyr bolt actions.

There was a period where Walther WA-2000’s and HK PSG-1’s were coveted pieces of hardware for departmental use, but those days are over.

Many intermediate-range firearms can be built out of the AR platform nowadays and offer substantially similar accuracy to these “Crown Jewel” type semi-automatic anti-personnel rifles of the past.

Larger teams and even smaller organizations generally default to bolt action highly accurate rifles to ensure they have most of the hardware equation taken care of and spend significant resources on training sharpshooters within their law enforcement agencies how to handle those rifles at longer distances.

From a depredation perspective:

Looking at the big business of killing hogs, coyotes, or other predatory animals nowadays, the AR has become a bit of a superstar in that realm. The ability to take animals at anywhere from 30 ft to 500 yd using the same cartridge, load, and hardware sets up an interesting scenario.

Looking at the landscape of the newer cartridges online in the AR realm, one can see plenty of fantastic options for depredation. We’ll explore a bit of that in the next segment regarding calibers and cartridge options.

Suffice it to say there are plenty of standout options for the AR platform that can generally achieve any goals a depredation-specific AR build has set out to accomplish.

From a multi-use perspective – specifically with regards to more versatile cartridge options:

First and foremost, the AR-15 utilizing the 223 Remington, or the 5.56 x 45 is already quite a versatile firearm.

But the argument gets much more interesting when you start talking about the available cartridges, especially those introduced in the last 5-10 years or so. When you look at the availability to the AR-15 of cartridges like the 6.5 Grendel, the .224 Valkyrie, the 6.8 SPC, the 300 Ham’r, and the .300 Blackout, you start to see a significantly versatile group of cartridges that combines well with one of the most versatile firearms in history.

Piggybacking on the success of the cartridges that fit within the ecosystem of the AR-15, one might also look at the long-range capabilities that come from using the AR-10 or .308 Winchester platform of the AR. This system allows you to get into cartridges like the .308, of course, which is here to stay, and has significant ballistic advantages over smaller cartridges, and the 6.5 Creedmoor. Some builds utilizing the 6.5 Creedmoor can push 1000 yd + capabilities on game targets, shooting sub minute of angle, easily.

What variables are most important when trying to improve consistency and ballistics past three hundred yards on a rifle like the AR-15?

From a component perspective, one of the most important parts you’ll want to emphasize to get past 300 yards routinely, will be your barrel, and how that matches from a twist rate and length perspective to the actual load you’ve settled on for the specific task you’re trying to accomplish.

You can also design this aspect from a different perspective: instead of settling on a specific load, look at the capabilities of the barrel length and the twist rate and then dial in a load to ensure that you have the maximum performance out of the barrel.

All things considered, the largest Improvement in overall capabilities is going to be the cartridge in which you will be shooting, paired with the most robust and finely tuned barrel you can find for the cartridge that you choose to use.

This does not mean that you can discount barrel mounting stability and the importance of trying to lock-in the stability and monolithic nature of the barrel connection to the firearm. These are necessary features that must be paid attention to.

A significant trigger upgrade can also do wonders in keeping you consistently on target. But an even bigger variable may be your optics and how they factor into your ability to get on and stay on target., especially when you need to compensate for bullet drop or on-the-fly windage concerns.

Additionally, mating a high tolerance upper receiver to a high tolerance lower receiver, or buying a matched set that prioritizes tight tolerances and is built to mate together for the long term, can also improve overall strategic accurizing methodologies.

Balancing the rifle can also be incredibly important, especially if you’re shooting something like a bespoke 26 inch 6.5 Creedmoor barrel, which will cause the front end of the AR to get incredibly heavy, while the back end remains considerably lighter.

Having the correct systems in place to improve balance, including things like a bipod, an improved buffer system, or a significantly adjustable buttstock and pistol grip, will be important. Matching the right forend or other furniture will also help to build a more “monolithic” rifle in general.

Did we completely overlook the AR-10 and substantially similar cloned 308 pattern semi-automatic AR rifles?

While we only spoke briefly about the 6.5 Creedmoor, it has become the poster child for modern-day AR accuracy. This goes without saying, that the larger, more robust .308 Winchester based AR-10 platform is already more suitable to a more accurate firearm build.

The inherent accuracy bonuses of using a round like the 6.5 Creedmoor, and the component parts that come along with such an inherently accurate cartridge, only improve the platform further. And as touched upon earlier, it is a proven concept, that a cartridge can have one of the biggest impacts on accuracy of all the variables within the accuracy equation.

While this discussion was initially built around the idea of pushing the limits of accuracy, and usability beyond what was a normal envelope of performance for the AR-15, it would be ridiculous not to include the AR-10, and the 6.5 Creedmoor.

That is also not to mention the .308 Winchester, which offers double or triple the long-range capabilities of the .223/5.56 cartridge.

When you look at the capabilities of such a compact and lightweight firearm as the AR-15 however, it is a little more difficult to achieve huge range capabilities, while also having ballistic superiority to comparative marketable options in the size range.

All that said, it’s important to understand how much impact the newer, more ballistically viable loads can have on pushing the AR-15 beyond its normal limits.

Before we even started discussing the topic in this article, it was probably already a foregone conclusion that anyone who didn’t understand that the AR-15 was capable of shooting on a regular basis, past three hundred yards, was being a little unfair to such a versatile rifle. But it should also not be discounted, that most shooters generally are never going to take a shot beyond 300 yards with an AR-15.

In fact, most readers of this article are maybe just now, for the first time, exploring the idea of shooting for long-range precision with an AR-15.

Again, this is not to say that the AR-15 should forever be pigeon-holed into something that only utilizes the .223 Remington or the 5.56 x 45 and must stay within the 350 to 400 yd extended range of those cartridges.

With the introduction of cartridges like the .224 Valkyrie and the 6.5 Grendel, and even the 6.8 SPC, the .300 Blackout, and the .300 Ham’r, the AR-15 has become something of a jack of all trades. A rifle that’s capable of shooting in a native capacity out of a bone stock rifle with a drop-in conversion on the upper end, out past 450 yd and significantly further – even out into the 650 yard territory without many changes to the original configuration.

The 224 Valkyrie, for instance, probably shoots well beyond 650 yards given the right wind conditions. The 6.5 Grendel would be a fine round to use when you have difficulty shooting out past six hundred yards where the Grendel is still quite comfortable. If you need to get past that point you can move into the AR-10 platform and access the .308, or the 6.5 Creedmoor.

Even without getting into the AR-10 spectrum, you could still utilize the 6.5 Grendel or the 6.8 SPC out past the usable strategic range of mainstream mil-spec 7.62 x 51mm ammunition under ideal conditions.

Considering this is available on a smaller, lighter weight and easier to wield, lower recoiling AR-15 platform, instead of utilizing the .308 Winchester, or the 7.62 x51mm on the larger platform, there are a lot of options for the AR-15 to go past 300 yards.

Let’s draw some conclusions about shooting past 300 yards with an AR

Given the plethora of rounds, and the ability to customize the AR, one is not stuck within the relatively short-range provided by the original caliber of the AR-15. Given the ability to hop up into the next class level of AR, with the AR-10, the shooter now also has access to a nearly 1,000 yd firearm, out of factory, without much accuracy-tweaking necessary.

Part of the problem with many shooters never pushing the limits of their AR, is that many ranges don’t offer sufficient long-range shooting capabilities, and public lands don’t offer the clean environment full of safety considerations for them to shoot their rifle past the 300 yard mark.

Perhaps it was a little disingenuous to peg the .223 and a 5.56 x45 into a corner that establishes a mere 300 or 350 yard range as the extended operational range of the cartridge.

But, for the purposes of this discussion we believed it opened up the concept that one need not settle for arbitrary ranges, when one can custom build or custom-tailor a factory rifle built on an AR platform, to shoot far beyond, and even double or triple the average range of mainstream loads with mainstream factory battle rifles in the AR-15 platform.

Hopefully, with a bit of research and a little bit of effort, everyone who has read this article to this point, we’ll have the impetus to push their own personal comfort zone past the 300 or 350 yd range with the AR-15.

It may help push readers to contemplate building something capable of shooting double or even triple the range, with around the same “near minute of angle accuracy” that most factory rifles are coming to market with.

Given the high customizability of the AR-15 platform, building a one-off version of a highly competent and highly accurate, moderate to long range precision rifle is within the grasp of most users reading this article.

Primary Focus is a weekly feature from Primary Arms that covers various firearms related subjects.

Blunt Force: The Underreported Threat Of The Security Professional

February 5th, 2022

What is ‘blunt force’, and what type of injuries result from blunt force impact?

Please let me answer this question in the shortest possible way, without throwing some hyper intellectual medical terminologies at you, I don’t understand myself. Let me do it in reasonable simple and understandable terms, and more importantly, within context of this article.

Severe injuries and deaths resulting from blunt force trauma are some of the most common cases encountered by forensic pathologists. For instance, almost all transportation fatalities, including those involving road traffic collisions and pedestrians being hit by vehicles result from blunt force trauma.

Blunt force trauma is also the consequence faced by homeland and private security professionals after being hit by a solid object, such as a fist, foot, knee, elbow, iron bar, extendable baton, baseball bat, crowbar, brick, bottle, can, chair, fire extinguisher, to name but a few, or indeed after being pushed hard against another solid object e.g. door, wall, floor or car or down a flight of stairs etc.

Something that remains widely underreported since shootings and stabbings seem to make more dramatic headlines in the mainstream media.

When asking a couple of law firms how they would define ‘blunt force trauma injuries’ they responded with the following answers:

“A severe traumatic episode caused to the body (or head) with the sudden introduction of a blunt instrument used with great force.”

“Blunt force trauma is when the body is hit with an object that is blunt, or not sharp, with enough force to cause significant damage”.

According to Wikipedia, blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) comprises 75% of all blunt trauma and is the most common example of this injury.

The severity of such injury is mostly determined by the speed, velocity, size and weight of the object, and can range in severity from a tiny bruise to internal haemorrhages, bone fractures, cardiac tamponade, airway obstructions/rupture, and in the worst-case scenario result in ruptured organs, rapid internal bleeding and ultimately your death.

I do believe most security professionals will be aware of the potential severity of injuries resulting from blunt force. But I don’t believe many will chose to document and report every incident of this nature. “Too much admin”, some may say, and “it’s part of the job”, others will state.

Many security professionals have a reasonable understanding of the most realistic risks and threats they face, and subsequently are either being issued, or they themselves invest in body armour.

However, it is worth noting that any type of flexible body armour made from either an aramid fibre (i.e. Kevlar®) or a polyethylene (i.e. Dyneema®) including the latest high performance body armour produced by top secret manufacturers at top secret locations for top secret agencies, do not offer anywhere near enough protection from this specific operational risk. 

On a domestic level (meaning homeland or private security, rather than military) the risk of being punched, beaten, kicked, or faced by someone throwing stuff at you is hundred times higher than being stabbed or shot.  Therefore, it is rather saddening to see that more than 99% of body armour issued to domestic homeland security professionals offer insufficient protection from this specific risk.

Again, in the context of a good body armour, the key objective must be to offer sufficient levels of protection from the most realistic threats and risks you faces whilst on duty.

I urge you to make a conscious decision when investing in such type of PPE.  Simply ask yourself the question, what is the most important criteria for YOU?  The concealability, the weight, the thickness, or the level of protection from the risks and threats you have identified?

If the concealability of a body armour is key for you (i.e. covert operations and surveillance) then you may well need to look for the thinnest body armour, and the ‘blunt force trauma’ protection may have to become of secondary importance.  

However, please understand that in general the most likely risk you face on a daily basis, is also the one you should seek protection from, and as I have stated earlier on in this article, the probability of you getting punched, hit, kicked or pushed around or have someone throwing stuff at you is far greater than the risk of being stabbed or shot.

To achieve the maximum level of protection from blunt force trauma injuries a body armour would have to be of a rigid structure, rather than a soft/flexible structure. Two diverse protective devices which highlight in a brilliantly understandable way the importance and the effectiveness of such protection are:

1. Motorbike Helmets: Never mind the fact that wearing a helmet is law when riding a motorbike. Wearing a helmet during a motorcycle crash significantly reduces the risk of damage to one’s skull, traumatic brain injury, and even death, countless studies have shown. We all know motorbike helmets are of a rigid/solid structure.  They would not offer the blunt force protection and perform to the level it is required if the structure would be soft or flexible.

2. Riot Shields:  A riot shield is a lightweight protection device, typically deployed and used by police in almost every country during riots, protests and mass disturbances. They are typically constructed from a rigid material to offer maximum levels of protection from attacks with blunt weapons and thrown projectiles.  The officers’ lives depend on the performance of this piece of equipment. Again, to offer this high level of blunt force protection, it is required for its structure to be rigid, not soft or flexible.

The most in-depth research study on ‘blunt force trauma injuries’ or in more tactical terms ‘backface signature injuries’ sustained while wearing such body armour was produced by Marianne Wilhelm back in 2008, and is titled “Injuries to law enforcement officers: The backface signature injury”. It really is worth a read.

This great piece has raised important questions regarding the protection afforded to officers wearing personal body armour, along with the current test methods used to assess the true performance of the equipment. Some test results showed that some revealed deformations exceeding the NIJ Standard’s backface signature limit. Such increased deformation can lead to serious injuries, including blunt force trauma or backface signature injuries, which have occurred in the field over and over again.

Although your body armour might be successful in containing the round fired by a weapon or the knife thrusted at you by a hostile individual, it might not protect you from the impacting energy during other types of assaults, unless it is offering you officially certified protection from this precise risk.  The most respected standard for body armour in relation to blunt force trauma protection is Germany’s VPAM (Vereinigung der Prüfstellen für Angriffshemmende Materialien und Konstruktionen) Standard, titled: “Testing of Impact Resistance against Throwing and/or Striking Objects” and its rating will be W1 (lowest) – W9 (highest).

It is also worth pointing out that our Technical Director Colin Mackinnon, a man who served 26+ years with the UK’s Police Forces, delivered an online presentation to a large audience of security professionals recently.  Following his presentation, he asked a question: “Does your armour protect against knife, spike, needle, and blunt force trauma?”

Out of those questioned 55% of people did not know what protection their vests provided.

About the Author

Robert Kaiser is the CEO and Founder of PPSS Group, a UK headquartered company specialising in design, production, and supply of high-performance body armour. Robert and his senior team all have significant level of operational frontline experience in military, law enforcement or homeland security.  His written word has been featured in several industry leading, international publications.