TYR Tactical

Archive for the ‘Guest Post’ Category

US Army Selects Four Contractors for Engineer Autonomous Breaching Capability to Automate Battlefield Breaching Operations

Friday, July 10th, 2026

DETROIT ARSENAL, Mich. – The Capability Program Executive Mission Autonomy announced today the selection of four companies for the Engineer Autonomous Breaching Capability (EABC) initiative, a key effort to modernize engineer support for Soldiers on the battlefield.

This project will develop and prototype autonomous systems capable of rapidly breaching complex obstacles and minefields under direct observation and fire, minimizing personnel exposure and ensuring the safe passage of follow-on forces. The selected contractors will provide advanced robotic systems designed for beyond-line-of-sight autonomous control, directly enhancing the Army’s ability to conduct multi-domain operations.

The four selected companies – Caterpillar (Irving, Texas), Forterra (Clarksburg, Md.), IDV USA (York, Pa.) and Overland AI (Seattle) — were chosen for their innovative approaches to autonomous breaching. Their proposed technologies range from autonomous commercial equipment to purpose-built robotic platforms, both featuring modular payloads to support varied breaching requirements.

Formal contract awards for the EABC initiative are expected to be finalized in the coming weeks. Once awarded, the project will advance into a series of demonstrations and assessments, culminating in a Transformation in Contact unit assessment in early 2027. This rotation will allow the Army to collect direct, unit-level feedback to inform the production decision for the next generation of autonomous engineer systems.

By Ashley John

Warfighter Milestone: Soldiers Successfully Remote Fire Next Generation Obstacle Emplacement Capability Autonomous Volcano

Thursday, July 9th, 2026

PICATINNY ARSENAL, N.J. – Marking the latest milestone in its history, the Army has expanded the capabilities of the M139 Volcano System with the first remote firing of the Autonomous Volcano next generation obstacle emplacement capability.

The demonstration took place at Camp Grayling, MI on May 19 during three days of hands-on training and included distinguished visitors from the United Kingdom’s Assistant Head Ground Maneuver Directorate – Col. James Fern, the Engineer Commandant, Col. Tim Hudson, and Future Capabilities Director, Col. Hector Montemayor.

The Autonomous Volcano system uses the reliable M139 Volcano mine dispenser, which can lay up to 960 mines to create a barrier about 120 meters wide and 1,100 meters long. It is mounted on the Palletized Load System (PLS) A1 truck and operates with an autonomous By-Wire/Active Safety Kit.

Autonomous delivery of obstacles is a massive force multiplier that shapes the battlespace at tempo. The Autonomous Volcano systems preserves combat power by removing engineers from the danger zone and forward line of troops while simultaneously allowing multi-vehicle remote firings that enable friendly forces to disrupt the enemy before they can react. This new technology also provides digital precision by automatically logging and injecting exact obstacle coordinates directly into the Common Operating Picture for seamless joint coordination.

In the first live-fire scenario, four Soldiers from the 576th Combat Engineer Company – Armored, 4th Engineering Battalion remotely fired M88 cannisters from a M139 Volcano for the first time marking a major milestone in advanced autonomous mobility for battlefield shaping.

The second scenario highlighted the robotic autonomy of the system and consisted of emplacing two distinct fix/disrupt minefields autonomously in two separate areas simultaneously. Autonomous Volcano achieved its objective with no human interference necessary.

The M139 Volcano was developed in the 1980s during the latter years of the Cold War and consists of a Volcano dispensing system mounted on the Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT). The move to an autonomous variant involved integrating the system into a PLS with the Forterra autonomy stack. “Autonomous Volcano leverages low-cost modernization to turn a legacy platform into a high-yield autonomous asset – securing asymmetric overmatch and closing a critical area-denial gap,” said Col. Vinson Morris, Project Manager Close Combat Systems (PM CCS). “It’s an example of how the Army is embracing the ‘fight tonight’ concept where readiness is not a static goal but a continuous process of adaptation and improvement.”

A joint program between the Army and the UK, Autonomous Volcano exemplifies collaboration both with international partners and within the Army. Both the CPE & AE and CPE AS worked together, within PAE AS&A, to support the project by combining their expertise and bringing together vehicles managed by CPE Combat Logistics and munitions developed under the Product Manager Terrain Shaping Obstacles (PdM TSO) team within the PM CCS office.

PdM TSO worked together with U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command’s (DEVCOM) Armaments Center and Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC), and industry partner Forterra to ensure seamless interoperability between platforms and munitions enabling enhanced operational effectiveness and streamlined logistics.

“This joint effort aligns directly with integrated deterrence. Our partnership with the UK on this development ensures seamless allied interoperability and shared Research and Development, strengthening our combined coalition posture,” said Bernie Theisen, Chief Technology Officer, DEVCOM GVSC.

By leveraging the expertise of the PAE AS&A team, the Volcano system demonstrates the Army’s ability to deliver integrated solutions that address complex battlefield requirements. This collaboration exemplifies the power of the Army Transformation Initiative.

After the successful proof-of-concept demonstration at Camp Grayling, the Autonomous Volcano program will demonstrate its capabilities at Project Convergence Capstone 6 at Fort Irwin, CA to transition from prototyping to operational testing. On July 13, Soldiers will operate the system in multiple realistic scenarios; then on 29 July it will be part of the “Best of Breed” demonstration to the Secretary of the Army.

By Michael Chambers

Prometheus Design Werx Releases the Apex Boonie Hat

Wednesday, July 8th, 2026

A modern refinement of the Vietnam-era RECCE boonie. Custom-milled 2-way stretch NYCO+ Ripstop. Bug-proof NoSeeUm mesh liner. Made in Vietnam, the country where the boonie hat was born.

San Francisco, CA — July 8, 2026 — Prometheus Design Werx announces the Apex Boonie Hat, a modern interpretation of a Vietnam-era field classic built on the RECCE short brim, a custom-milled 2-way stretch NYCO+ Ripstop shell, a bug-proof NoSeeUm mesh liner, and a cinching crown fit system. It’s available now for $59.00 USD, available in three colorways: Universal Field Gray, All Terrain Brown, and Ranger Green.

FROM THE JUNGLES OF VIETNAM TO THE RECCE BRIM

The boonie hat is one of those rare pieces of equipment that transcended its origins so completely that most people wearing one today have no idea where it came from. It started as improvised headwear sewn by Vietnamese tailors from salvaged parachute fabric, made its way into the field with American troops in the early 1960s, and within a decade became standard issue across all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces. For over half a century the design held. That kind of longevity does not happen by accident, it happens when a piece of equipment solves a problem so well that no one can improve on the core concept.

The Apex Boonie is built on the RECCE cut, a field modification born with Vietnam-era reconnaissance teams who trimmed their brim widths to improve peripheral vision during close-quarters jungle movement. It is a refinement, not a reinvention: identify what works, understand why it works, then apply contemporary materials science without losing the functional DNA that made the original essential.

THE HAT

The shell is a custom-milled 6.8oz NYCO+ Ripstop – 55% cotton, 42% high-tenacity N6 nylon, 3% spandex. The nylon delivers durability, quick-dry performance, and resistance to rot and mildew. The cotton contributes breathability and a natural hand feel. The 2-way stretch, a feature no standard boonie offers, lets the hat conform to the wearer’s head, pack flat without permanent creasing, and return to shape after being rolled into a pack or stuffed into a cargo pocket.

Ventilation runs through soft, low-profile slit vents rather than the stamped, corrosion-prone metal eyelets of the original, each backed by NoSeeUm mesh, the same fine-weave netting used in high-performance backpacking tents, to block insects while allowing airflow through the crown. The interior is finished with a synthetic micro-suede sweatband that wicks moisture and resists odor over all-day wear. A cinching crown system with custom nylon toggle locks dials in fit, and a cinching chin strap secures the hat during active movement and high wind. Classic foliage and accessory loops run the crown, with a rear loop panel for cat eyes, insignia, or reflective tape, and an interior map pocket rounds out the build.

MADE IN VIETNAM

The Apex Boonie Hat is made in Vietnam, the country where the modern boonie hat was born. The sewing workshops that produced the first locally made boonies in the 1960s established a garment manufacturing tradition that today serves the world’s leading technical outdoor and premium apparel brands. Making the Apex Boonie in Vietnam is a direct acknowledgment of that lineage; a homecoming.

SPECIFICATIONS

Materials:

– 6.8oz, 55% Cotton / 42% High Tenacity N6 Nylon / 3% Spandex NYCO+ Ripstop

– 70D Nylon Ripstop

– Poly Synthetic Micro-Suede

– Nylon NoSeeUm Mesh

– Custom Nylon Slotted Buttons and Toggle Locks

– Poly Flat Lace / T40 Nylon Thread

Features:

– Custom-Milled 2-Way Stretch Technical Ripstop Fabric

– Bug-Proof NoSeeUm Mesh Liner

– Soft, Low-Profile Slit Vents for Airflow

– Synthetic Micro-Suede Sweatband

– Cinching Crown Fit System with Chin Strap

– Interior Map Pocket

– Foliage/Accessory Loops and Rear Loop Panel for Cat Eyes, Insignia, or Reflective Tape

Sizing:

– S/M: 6.5″ – 7.375″ head circumference

– M/L: 7.375″ – 7.75″ head circumference

Get yours at prometheusdesignwerx.com/collections/instock/products/pdw-apex-boonie-hat-recce.

DAF Reassigns Advanced Intelligence Formal Training Units to ACC

Wednesday, July 8th, 2026

JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS) —  

The Department of Air Force has initiated the reassignment of combat air forces advanced intelligence formal training units from Air Education and Training Command to Air Combat Command.

This strategic move, overseen by Gen. Adrian Spain, commander of ACC, and Lt. Gen. Clark Quinn, commander of AETC, will be a streamlined process designed to align intelligence Airmen directly with combat-focused missions. The reassignment will enable the Distributed Common Ground System and Targeting IFTUs and the Contingency Intelligence Network Intelligence Initial Qualification Course to deliberately integrate operational training courses with operational units.

Air Force IFTUs specialize in developing operational proficiency for intelligence Airmen. These units provide system and mission-specific training, ensuring a seamless transition from foundational skills to combat-readiness.

Directed by Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink, the reassignment leverages ACC’s resources and expertise as the Air Force lead for the Distributed Common Ground System and Combat Air Intelligence Systems. This initiative is expected to enhance readiness, match training with combat requirements and optimize all associated training resources.

“By reassigning our intelligence formal training units to Air Combat Command, we are shrinking the gap between the classroom and the battlespace,” said Brig. Gen. Abraham Jackson, Director of Intelligence for Air Combat Command. “Our Airmen will learn the most current tactics and techniques directly from the operational force, ensuring they graduate highly capable and ready to impact the mission from day one. This reassignment allows us to rapidly inject the latest threat realities into our curriculum to meet the demands of a highly dynamic environment.”

AETC has been instrumental in managing IFTUs and producing combat-ready Airmen. Reassigning these intelligence formal training units to ACC connects the students with the operational experts who are currently executing the mission in real-time.

“AETC is the Air Force’s center of excellence for foundational training, and we are proud of the world-class intelligence professionals our instructors produce,” said Col. Andy Freeman, AETC Director of Intelligence. “This CSAF-directed realignment strengthens the training pipeline by formally linking AETC’s foundational expertise with ACC’s front-line operational focus. This partnership ensures our Airmen are more lethal and ready to confront pacing threats from day one.”

 As part of this reassignment, the DCGS IFTU, currently located at Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, will relocate to the 480th Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Wing at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia. Additionally, the Targeting IFTU, also located at Goodfellow AFB, will relocate to the 363rd Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Wing at Langley AFB. The 17th Training Wing at Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, will remain assigned to AETC.

An AETC-ACC transition task force will ensure a smooth and seamless transition for affected personnel and their families.

The conditions-based reassignment plan will occur in two phases with the DCGS IFTU and Targeting IFTU transitioning this summer, and the CIN course reassignment occurring in early 2027.

  • Distributed Common Ground System IFTU, 17th TRW, Goodfellow AFB, Texas, to 480th ISRW, Langley AFB, Virginia.
  • Targeting IFTU, 17th TRW, Goodfellow AFB, Texas, to 363rd ISRW, Langley AFB, Virginia.
  • Contingency Intelligence Network Intelligence Initial Qualification Course, 17th TRW, Goodfellow AFB, Texas

By Air Combat Command Public Affairs

US Army INSCOM Conducts Change of Command Ceremony

Tuesday, July 7th, 2026

FORT BELVOIR, Va. – On Friday, June 5, 2026, Maj. Gen. Rhett R. Cox took command of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), relieving Maj. Gen. Timothy D. Brown.

The ceremony, presided over by Lt. Gen. Michelle A. Schmidt, U.S. Army deputy chief of staff, G-2, brought together senior Army leaders and previous INSCOM commanding generals. Brown served as INSCOM’s commanding general from Dec. 10, 2023, to June 5, 2026. He retired from the U.S. Army after more than 35 years of service.

“Brown led operations that ensured that INSCOM delivered intelligence to drive decision advantage,” Schmidt said. “He optimized the force, strengthened the workforce, and delivered intelligence that protected the force and enabled targeting. You made INSCOM a more agile and responsive command.”

Brown led INSCOM’s 18,000 personnel across 40 countries and 180 locations and orchestrated a historical organizational transformation by consolidating 17 major subordinate commands into 15, significantly enhancing operational efficiency and agility across the global enterprise.

During his tenure, INSCOM and its units stationed around the globe made advancements in critical intelligence capabilities, such as the retirement of legacy aerial intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (AISR) aircraft while transitioning to modern air frames, such as the High Accuracy Detection and Exploitation System (HADES) and the Army Theater-Level High-Altitude Expeditionary Airborne (ATHENA) airframes, that allow the service to see and sense farther than any prior AISR asset.

Brown provided foundational intelligence support for National Defense Strategy priorities and major operations, including rapid surge support during crises such as Operation EPIC FURY where INSCOM enabled critical communications and multi-discipline intelligence support in contested environments. Among his other notable accomplishments, he strengthened global partnerships, enhanced intelligence production and information sharing, and developed and executed data literacy and AI training for over 10,000 Soldiers and civilians, upskilling the workforce to meet future intelligence challenges.

His vision for INSCOM has been to fight and win in contested spaces with his focus on the Soldier outside the wire and in harm’s way.

“Leadership is not about the person at the top. It’s our 18-year-olds that are guarding freedom’s frontier,” said Brown. “They are a national treasure. It’s the reason we serve at INSCOM – to give them intelligence before making contact with the enemy. Intelligence drives our strategy to fight and win, and those Soldiers are the key to defending the nation. They are the best of us, and they inspire me every day.”

Cox, INSCOM’s incoming commander, comes to INSCOM from his previous assignment as Schmidt’s senior military advisor. Before that assignment, he served at one of INSCOM’s major subordinate commands (MSC) as commanding general of U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command at Fort Meade, Maryland for three years.

“Rhett has operational, tactical, and strategic levels of service,” said Schmidt. “He understands operational challenges and INSCOM’s critical role to make sure the Army wins anytime, anywhere.”

In his final farewell to the command, Brown warmly welcomed Cox to the INSCOM team.

“The army built a weapon system in the form of Rhett Cox. There is probably no better prepared MI corps leader having the right job at right time performing the right way,” said Brown. “He’s my friend. My battle buddy. This is the moment to transition to up gun INSCOM and that’s with Rhett Cox.”

A graduate of Virginia Military Institute, Cox commissioned into the U.S. Army Military Intelligence Corps in 1993. Cox has served within INSCOM in other positions, such as the commander of the 704th Military Intelligence Brigade (MIB), deputy all-source collection element chief, 297th Military Intelligence Battalion, 513th MIB Theater (MIB-T), and INSCOM deputy commander.  His other previous assignments include deputy chief for counterintelligence integration in the Strategic Competition Group at the Defense Intelligence Agency, director of the Joint Intelligence Training Center at Fort Huachuca, Arizona, and the G-2 for NATO Allied Land Command in Turkey.

“I’m extremely honored to be the 21st commanding general of INSCOM,” said Cox. “All of us at INSCOM should never forget our duty to deliver intelligence. It’s been awesome to see this team rally around its commands to support them during recent conflicts, rapid technical change and strategic competition. We will do our best to ensure our enemies cannot operate uncontested in our area of responsibility. INSCOM has your back, and we will ensure you have what you need to meet your adversaries.”

By Erin Rohn

BFG Monday: A Med Kit Is Only Useful If You Can Actually Get to It

Monday, July 6th, 2026

Casualties rarely happen when gear is laid out neatly on a tailgate.

They happen in vehicles, in the dark, in tight spaces, during movement, under stress, and usually when nobody has extra time to sort through equipment. In that moment, the question is not whether a Soldier, law enforcement officer, or first responder has medical gear somewhere on their kit. The question is whether that gear can be found, accessed, and put to work immediately.

That difference matters.

Tourniquets, pressure dressings, chest seals, and other trauma supplies have become standard equipment across military, law enforcement, and emergency response communities. Carrying that equipment is important. But carrying medical gear is not the same as being ready to use it.

A med kit buried behind other equipment, mounted too far back on a belt, trapped under layers of load carriage, or difficult to open with one hand may technically be present. But present is not the same as ready. If the user has to fight the setup before treating the casualty, the gear is already working against the mission.


U.S. Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt. Sarah M. McClanahan

Under stress, fine motor skills deteriorate. Decision-making narrows. Tasks that seem simple during equipment layout become harder when the environment is loud, dark, confined, or chaotic. That is why medical gear placement deserves the same level of thought as the contents of the kit itself.

A tactical med kit should be positioned around real use, not just available space.

Can it be reached with either hand?

Can it be accessed while seated in a vehicle?

Can another team member find and deploy it if the casualty cannot?

Can critical items be identified quickly in limited visibility?

Can the kit be opened without dumping the contents or fighting unnecessary closures?

Those questions matter because medical readiness is not measured by how much gear is carried. It is measured by how quickly the right equipment can be employed when seconds matter.

Most warfighters and armed professionals already carry more than enough. Radios, ammunition, comms gear, breaching tools, protective equipment, sustainment items, and mission-specific equipment all compete for limited real estate on the body. As the loadout becomes more complex, medical gear can get pushed into whatever space is left.

That is where problems begin.

An IFAK or trauma kit should not be an afterthought. It should be treated as mission-essential equipment that has to be reachable, identifiable, and secure without becoming a burden. Belt-mounted medical kits, MOLLE-mounted medical pouches, and carrier-mounted trauma kits all have their place, but the location has to match the user, the mission, and the environment.

A patrol officer working from a vehicle may need a different setup than an infantryman moving under load. A member of a tactical team may need the kit accessible to others. A range instructor or prepared citizen may prioritize a smaller belt-mounted trauma kit that can be reached quickly without adding unnecessary bulk.

The right answer depends on the job.

The better way to think about it is not simply, “Do I have a med kit?” It is, “Where should I carry a med kit so it can actually be reached under stress?”


U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Jorge Borjas

Blue Force Gear® medical kits were built around that reality. The Micro Trauma Kit NOW!® and Trauma Kit NOW!® are designed to keep trauma supplies organized, protected, and accessible without adding unnecessary bulk. The removable insert keeps the contents together, while the BLIP® pull tab allows the kit to be deployed quickly when fine motor skills are compromised. Belt-mounted and MOLLE-mounted options give users the ability to place the kit where it actually makes sense for the mission, not just wherever there is leftover space.

That is especially important when the person who needs the gear may not be the person using it. In a real emergency, another member of the team may be the one reaching for the kit. If they cannot find it, open it, or identify what is inside quickly, valuable time is lost.

Emergencies do not reward preparation on paper.

They reward action.

And action starts with being able to reach the equipment that matters most.

Medical readiness is more than checking a box on an equipment list. It requires thoughtful placement, reliable access, and consistent training. Teams that evaluate trauma equipment through access, not just inventory, are better positioned to respond when seconds matter.

If the kit cannot be reached with either hand, found by another member of the team, or opened when conditions are less than ideal, the setup needs to be reconsidered.

The best medical gear in the world cannot help if it cannot be reached.

That is the reality Blue Force Gear designs for. The Micro Trauma Kit NOW! and Trauma Kit NOW! are built to cut through those critical seconds of hesitation, keeping life-saving supplies exactly where you need them, organized, visible, and ready when hands begin to shake and fine motor skills start to fade. When stress closes in and time slips away, there is no room to search or fumble. In the moment that matters most, access is not just important. It is everything.

For units seeking to increase survivability and operational performance through reduced load carriage by upgrading to Helium Whisper, contact the Blue Force Gear Military Department or visit BlueForceGear.com.

Silent Professionals Set the Conditions for Red Flag Success

Saturday, July 4th, 2026

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska — In the brisk Alaskan air, on a steep hillside overlooking the vast terrain, U.S. Army Special Forces Soldiers assigned to 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) are preparing for one of the region’s most demanding combat training exercises: Red Flag-Alaska.

For decades, Red Flag-Alaska has provided aircrews with the opportunity to train against realistic threats under contested conditions, building experience and confidence before facing real-world adversaries. Yet while fighter aircraft streak across the sky above the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex, another fight begins long before the first jet takes to the air.

Inside a nondescript room on Eielson Air Force Base, Green Berets huddled around maps, terrain imagery and mission graphics covering nearly every available table and wall space. Tactical communications equipment fills the corners of the room while planners refine timelines and routes. A briefing slide advances across a wall-mounted television, detailing the next day’s mission.

The ground force commander spoke with precision, pointing to a route displayed on the screen. It was a surprising shift. Moments earlier, the team had been smiling, joking and laughing with each other. Now, they were all business, shifted into attentive and deliberate professionals. Routes, contingencies and communications plans were discussed with the matter-of-fact tone of a team who had rehearsed the process countless times before. The mission is part of Operation Close Shave, the ground component executed by the Green Berets in support of the large scale combat operations exercise scenario.

While fighter aircraft may be the most visible element of Red Flag, they are rarely the spearhead of the operation, Green Berets shaping the battlefield before they leave the runway.

Before aircraft can operate freely in contested airspace, special operations forces work deep within contested or enemy territory to identify threats, gather intelligence and create conditions that allow the joint force to maneuver. An ODA, or Operational Detachment-Alpha, the foundational unit of action for U.S. Army Special Forces, provides commanders with the information required to help clear a path for the aircraft and paratroopers that follow.

A two-hour trip south, near Delta Junction, brings the ODA to a pothole-filled side road, Denali’s peak reaching out of the horizon like someone painted it onto the sky. Alaska’s natural beauty served as a somewhat dangerous distraction while in the opposing force’s territory; the simulated country borders indicated that the team was well behind “enemy” lines.

A group of individuals on the roadside approached the lead vehicle, the driver became cautious before realizing these were allied counterparts, operators and paratroopers from the Belgian 3 PARA (Regiment). From wary to relieved, all are smiling as introductions were exchanged and the Belgians offered to show the way to the “safe house.” Safe houses act as bases of operations for Special Forces operators; while not necessarily a house in many cases, they act as both a command center, shelter, cover, and concealment from enemy forces and civilian populations, respectively.

This particular safe house, The Alaska Flour Company is a real-world business and working farm that would function as the team’s base of operations for the next week, playing into their scenario simulated cover story as seasonal farm workers in the area; an effort to blend in with the local populace. Equipped with fake IDs and cover stories, the option to fight was only ever considered as a last course of action.

The wooden structure housing the teams was not much more than a long, wide, dark, open corridor used for grain processing, the structure being colder inside than it was out. The Belgians had set up a barrel fire outside to warm their extremities from the frigid interior of the flour plant. One of them said something in Dutch as the others around the fire laughed, stoking the flames. It was a moment of relaxation and comfort before the long days ahead.

Hours later, vivid colors painted the Alaskan sky as the multinational team of special operators moved quietly along a riverbank, carrying the equipment they would need for days of reconnaissance.

The absence of darkness during the far north’s summer nights increased the risk of detection during their no-fail reconnaissance mission. Heavy animal activity in the form of large predator’s leftover meals served as constant reminders of the dangers posed by the wildlife surrounding them. With the high-risk environment in mind, the operators set up fallback positions, established communications with rear command elements and edged toward their objectives.

Using a mix of fieldcraft and technology, the teams split into two-man elements and traversed through thick woods toward the scenario’s air defense objectives.

Through the brush, a fenced-off compound emerged ahead, revealing large mockup integrated air defense systems depicting surface-to-air missile launchers, radars and other mobile air defense equipment. The mock missile launchers hidden among the trees represented exactly the type of threat Red Flag planners wanted the ODA, and their allied counterparts, to confront.

In the exercise scenario, a network of integrated air defense systems, radar sites and command-and-control nodes formed layered barriers, designated to deny access and maneuvering capability to coalition aircraft. These systems force pilots to contend with threats capable of detecting and engaging their aircraft long before they reach critical objectives.

Finding those threats is where special operations provide a critical advantage. Small teams, specializing in operating in hostile, denied and contested environments, infiltrate challenge areas to observe targets, evaluate and/or confirm intelligence and develop a comprehensive picture of the operational environment. The information they collect helps commanders distinguish between suspected targets and verified threats, reducing uncertainty before air assets are committed.

In an era increasingly defined by technological advantages such as satellites, drones and electronic sensors, it may be tempting to assume technology alone can provide every answer. However, modern battlefields remain environments of constant adaptation, where adversaries actively employ camouflage, deception, electronic warfare measures/countermeasures and other techniques designed to obscure themselves and their operations. A target detected by one sensor may prove to be a decoy when observed from the ground. Even the most advanced collection platforms can produce incomplete or conflicting information when confronted by a determined adversary. In the end, commanders often still rely on someone physically confirming at the target site and reporting accurate and timely information.

“The problem with satellite sensors is they have a harder time maintaining eyes on,” said one of the Special Forces Soldier. “If we are able to get behind enemy lines and conduct an operation like this, there’s a constant ground sensor.”

For ODAs, fieldcraft, observation and direct confirmation remain indispensable tools. The ability to physically verify with eyes on a target provide joint forces commanders a level of certainty that technology alone cannot always deliver. In a contested environment, that assurance can mean the difference between a successful air campaign and aircraft flying into unknown threats.

“We are deep behind enemy territory trying to open the air corridor and allow conventional forces to parachute in and gain control of this area,” the Soldier said. “We’re here in support of the main effort, which is the joint force entry of the 11th Airborne Division, so they can jump in, get boots on the ground and begin taking control of key terrain or infrastructure.”

The ODAs remained concealed among moss-covered logs and dense vegetation bordering the clearing, quietly observing and transmitting information while remaining mindful of OPFOR operating in the area.

“No troop transport planes, C-17s or anything like that, can gain access to this airspace to conduct an air operation until these are taken out,” the Soldier declared. For the next several days, reconnaissance and observation remained the primary mission. Operators relied on their advanced knowledge of wilderness survival skills, keeping fire going, supplementing field rations with food gathering and demonstrating basic shelter construction. Despite the constant sunlight, temperatures plunged into the low 30s overnight. Frigid hours bundled in waterproof clothing without a heat source were but a glimpse into the conditions special operations personnel endure during real-world operations.

Although they had not yet encountered OPFOR, the implications of doing so remained top of mind.

“… The risk is detection and compromise,” the Soldier explained. “A mission like this in real life is extremely dangerous.” The Soldier emphasized, in no uncertain terms, just how perilous a task this can be. It was a sobering assessment. But how do operators mitigate that risk? “That’s why we do training like this,” he continued. “To figure out where our gaps are. Figure out where we need to improve. The only way you can infiltrate this deep, in my opinion, is by blending in, maintaining a very low signature and a very low pattern of life.”

During a quiet moment of the perpetual daylight, around 3 a.m., coffee simmered in a portable carafe one operator had carried into the field. A reminder that even among highly trained professionals, caffeine remains less a luxury than a necessity.

It was much the same for the next few days — observing and reporting — though it was hardly monotonous in the beautiful Alaskan wilds, especially when broken up by the appearance of wandering wildlife in the distance.

The day of the culminating event arrived, having moved to a mountainside near Fort Greely. Another Special Forces Soldier sat at an observation post overlooking an FLS, or field landing strip. Although runway-sized, was more or less a stretch of dirt that had been flattened and cleared of the pervasive brush that blanketed the rolling terrain.

The Soldier could see the opposing forces’ vehicles moving along the strip, ant sized from the nestled vantage point amongst the thick shrubbery adorning the mountainside. Crouched still while waiting for word on a strike mission, he discussed the role of the Belgian counterparts.

“So they’re going to be at the north end of the [drop zone]. Their leadership right now is co-located with [ground force commander] out here at the MSS,” the other ODA team member said, referring to the mission support site. “But they’re going to be at the north end of the DZ and they’re going to try to take a sniper shot to take out a guy with a man-portable air defense. He’s carrying an SA14. Going to try to find him… and then that way we can bring in [combat air support] and we can facilitate close air support, and help enable the joint forcible entry by the 11th Airborne Division.”

Put simply, the mission was to remove the threat preventing joint force aircraft from entering the area of operations — a task that was certainly easier said than done. Less than an hour later, the answer arrived with the roar of an F-16 Fighting Falcon overhead as it rolled in on its targets.

With the air defense systems neutralized, the spread-out teams gathered on the sloping overlook to watch the dozens of transport aircraft — American C-130s and Belgian A400Ms — begin to drop paratroopers by the score along the FLS. The ground forces’ mission was complete. Fighter jets and transports successfully reached the objective, and as the crack of the infantry’s weapons rang out over the peaks, the hasty exfiltration back to the vehicles began.

But the TACP, or tactical air control party, had one last surprise in store for the rest of the ODA. Confirming the transport craft had cleared the airspace, they radioed yet again, this time to the F-16s still circling the area and requested a “show of force.” While discussing what grid coordinates to give, one of the ODA members grinned and pointed. The unsuspecting range control contractors had been parked in their pickup trucks nearby for quite a while, breaking the illusion of the war game with their necessary presence. Still smiling, the TACP suggested, “How about them?”

Moments later, the F-16s screamed directly overhead, buzzing by the unsuspecting 4x4s, the frames of the trucks rattling as the contractors within suddenly jolted from their seats.

Descending toward the mountain pond vehicles were parked next to, Alaska revealed one last pleasant surprise. Grazing across the small body of water, a herd of caribou had come into the open, looking up and regarding the team with vague interest.

In the distance, the roar of jet engines was still audible, and as the ground forces’ role in Red Flag came to a concluded, the forces in the air were now free to dominate the battlefield, the conditions for success already set by the operators on the ground.

By SGT Nicholas Riccio

Freedom Atlantic Introduces FPV Training Drones

Friday, July 3rd, 2026

Freedom Atlantic now offers three 5″ FPV drone packages designed to meet you your mission.

1. Build it yourself. Receive the kit, follow the training path, and learn every component along the way.

2. Ready-to-fly. We assemble and configure the system so it’s ready to fly right out of the case.

3. Full immersion. Choose the location and our team will train you to build, program, train, and fly your FPV platform.

Ready to fly.

Ready to build.

Ready to become an operator.

Learn more at www.freedom-atlantic.com

#FreedomAtlantic #FPV #DroneTraining #UAS #MilitaryTechnology